Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Feb 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Allan Torr

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Allan Torr

  • Postcode verified

    LA17 7UH

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+8Mostly positivemore positive than 28% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentimprovingsuccessfulaccurate
Criticismweaknessestoo lownot yetnot effectivebelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,059
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs Sarah Powell Headteacher Burlington CofE School School Road Kirkby-in-Furness Cumbria LA17 7UH

p.1

School, Cumbria

Following my visit to the school on 14 January 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report my findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School, Cumbria

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in November 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School, Cumbria

Senior leaders and governors are not taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection. The school should take immediate action to:

p.1

School, Cumbria

 Restructure the committees of the governing body so there is more rapid and more frequent evaluation of:  pupils’ achievement and progress  progress against the key issues raised in the inspection report.  Begin the process of an external review of governance.  Reduce the headteacher’s teaching commitment so that more of her time can be spent leading the school.  Increase staff accountability by ensuring they play a full part in improving pupils’ achievement and leading improvements in the subjects they lead.  Amend the school improvement plan to add in milestones to help governors and the local authority to measure how successful the actions have been. Increase the level of expectation in the plan so that every pupil is expected to make progress and achieve well. CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

School, Cumbria

www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566939 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: glaw@cfbt.com

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I met with half of the governing body; with a representative of Cumbria Local Authority and with you and senior staff. I evaluated the school’s action plan and some of the new policies that had been written since the inspection. I also evaluated the staffing structure.

p.2

Context

Since the inspection, the Chair of the governing body resigned which meant a new Chair and Vice Chair started in December. Two new governors have been appointed.

p.2

Main findings

The recently-elected Chair of Governors has begun work to increase governors’ involvement in the life of the school and to gather a first-hand understanding of the quality of the school’s work. He has attended training which has resulted in increasing his knowledge of how to interpret data about pupils’ standards and the progress they make.

p.2

Main findings

Although there was a recommendation for the governing body to begin the process of an external review, no arrangements have been made for the review to take place. Governors were waiting for me to visit. As a result there has been some lost time in reorganising the committees and tackling any weaknesses in governance. The committee which evaluates pupils’ achievement, the quality of teaching and pupils’ behaviour meets approximately every three months. This means that governors have not yet had the chance to measure the impact of the school’s actions to improve pupils’ achievement. Being three months apart, the meetings do not enable governors to keep a frequent check on standards. Similarly, they have not been able to frequently discuss how well the points for improvement are being tackled.

p.2

Main findings

The headteacher as well as leading the school also leads mathematics, teaches for half a week, and is the special educational needs coordinator. This means that her ability to lead the school is curtailed because her time is spread thinly across other obligations. The governing body should quickly make provision to ensure the headteacher is able to spend more time improving teaching and getting the school to good.

p.2

Main findings

The headteacher has allocated subjects to different teachers to make sure the responsibility for improving teaching and pupils’ achievement is spread across the school. The teacher in Reception and Year 1 has created an action plan for her area of the school with a view to make improvements to teaching and pupils’ achievement. However leadership in other important subjects is at an early stage.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

The improvement plan covers each of the points for improvement identified at the inspection. It needs to be sharpened so that it is easier for governors and the local authority to measure the success of the actions. This can be done by inserting measurable milestones which will plot a route for the school towards its destination of becoming good at the next inspection. Some of the expectations of pupils are too low within the plan for example to attain the level expected for their age. These are not challenging enough and expectations need to be raised.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

At the start of this year, before the inspection, the local authority increased its support from the very light touch support it had been providing previously. The school advisor has contacted an external excellent teacher who has already started work to improve the quality of teaching. As yet there is no discernible impact. Since the inspection a monitoring group has met once to measure the school’s progress. As a result, the Chair of Governors has gained a rapid understanding of what needs to be done to improve and has a better understanding of how to interpret data about pupils’ achievement. The school has also benefitted from advice from the local authority’s personnel department to help set up a system to management the performance of teachers and other staff.

p.3

External support

The local authority advisor has conducted joint observations with the headteacher in each class. As a result, the headteacher has a moderated and accurate view about the quality of teaching in the school.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Cumbria and as below.

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

The letter should be copied to the following:

p.3

Her Majesty’s Inspector

 Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body  Local authority – including where the school is an academy  Diocese – for voluntary aided and voluntary controlled schools  The person or body responsible for appointing foundation governors if the school has a foundation  DfE - Academies Advisers Unit [ colin.diamond@education.gsi.gov.uk ] – for academies

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion