Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 3 Feb 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Lesley Cox

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Lesley Cox

  • Postcode verified

    E9 6HB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+58Positivemore positive than 56% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehigh qualityeffectiveimprovedenthusiasticimproving
Criticismnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
904
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Steve Gleason Headteacher Berger Primary School Anderson Road Hackney London E9 6HB

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 13 January 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School

 fully embed new senior and middle leadership roles to ensure that improvements in teaching standards and pupil outcomes are sustained

p.1

School

 ensure that the school action plan identifies specific monitoring roles and timescales, to allow leaders and governors to check that improvements are raising standards.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you and other senior leaders, a group of middle leaders, the Vice-Chair of the Governing Body and one other governor, and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last Tribal 1–4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5323 Direct email :suzy.smith@tribalgroup.com inspection. The school action plans were evaluated. I looked at other school improvement documents and joined you on a short tour of the school.

p.1

Context

Since the inspection you have extended the school day to provide more time to teach reading. You have introduced a new system for measuring how well pupils behave throughout the day. You have made changes to the management of Early Years and Foundation Stage and Year 1, as part of a wider review of school leadership roles. Two new teachers joined the school in January to lead specific areas of the wider curriculum and further increase your leadership capacity.

p.2

Main findings

The school action plan correctly identifies the improvements that need to be made and demonstrates that leaders have a good understanding of the necessary priorities. However, monitoring roles and timescales are not always closely linked to specific actions. This makes it difficult for leaders and governors to know how effective any actions have been or check that improvements are happening quickly enough.

p.2

Main findings

However, the actions you have taken are starting to take effect across the school. Pupil achievement and rates of progress improved last year. You have now analysed these results to identify where further interventions are still needed. Careful tracking of individuals and groups has allowed you to target where additional support is needed. As a result, you report that more pupils are making accelerated rates of progress.

p.2

Main findings

You have started to restructure your senior and middle leadership teams so that they are empowered to make a stronger contribution to raising standards. They are working together to realign themselves with new areas of responsibility and are enthusiastic about the changes you have made. When completed, additional capacity will be created to allow all leaders to make a contribution to monitoring and supporting teaching and learning throughout the school. Additional time has been provided for them to work with each other and with their teams so that high quality lessons can be planned and taught. Training and support is carefully matched to the needs of all staff, including teaching assistants, so that the amount of good or better teaching across the school can increase.

p.2

Main findings

The extension of the school day has provided more opportunities for pupils to read with teachers, each other and their parents. You report that standards in reading are starting to improve, and further initiatives are planned to escalate the rate of improvement in this area. You have introduced a new behaviour management system throughout the school and you believe that this has already had a significant impact on improving attitudes to learning. Governors have reviewed their own skills and have participated in further training. They have aligned their own action plan with the areas for improvement identified at the last inspection. This is helping them to provide increasingly high levels of challenge and support to school leaders, and ensure that necessary improvements are happening more quickly.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The school is part of a Trust Action Group (TAG) that meets half termly to measure the impact your actions have had. You consider that the support provided by the school improvement partner, provided through Hackney Learning Trust, has been of a high quality. She visits regularly to review the progress you are making. The school improvement partner has also assisted you in arranging other external support. This has included coaching for improving teachers, training for teachers within the Early Years Foundation Stage and developing more opportunities for teachers to network and work with staff from other schools. You are currently linking with three other primary schools on an initiative to raise reading standards in Key Stage 2 and are developing teaching links with the neighbouring secondary school.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hackney.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion