Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Sparkle Daycare

Inspected — · published 30 Jan 2014 · URN EY435689

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Susan Gregory

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Susan Gregory

  • Postcode verified

    NG9 8DJ

  • URN verified

    EY435689

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+16Mostly positivemore positive than 33% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivegood progresssafe
Criticisminadequate

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings312w−14
  • What needs to improve295w+56

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
606
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 51%What needs to improve 49%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD Telephone: 0300 123 1231 Fax: 0300 123 3159 Minicom: 0161 618 8524 Email: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk Web: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Sparkle Daycare 34 Church Street Stapleford NOTTINGHAM NG9 8DJ Our Reference EY435689

p.1

Outcome of monitoring visit for provision judged as inadequate

An Ofsted inspector, Diane Stone, carried out a monitoring visit of your provision on 11/12/2013. This visit follows on from your inspection where the provision was judged to be inadequate.

p.1

Outcome of the visit

As a result of our inspection on 15/10/2013, we sent you a welfare requirements notice.

p.1

Outcome of the visit

The notices required you to: ensure a Disclosure and Barring Service check is carried out for all staff working directly with the children; ensure effective recording of information about vetting processes. For example, record the Disclosure and Barring Service check reference number, date obtained and details of who obtained it; ensure that risk assessments and the nursery's policies and procedures are followed to ensure the safety of children at all times. This particularly relates to the risk assessment for outings and the use of appropriate seat restraints for all children in the vehicles used to transport them.

p.1

Outcome of the visit

You were also issued with a notice of actions to improve that required you to: ensure that at least one person with a current paediatric first aid certificate accompanies children on outings; undertake an effective risk assessment of the premises, equipment and outings and ensure that all necessary measures are taken to minimise any identified risks (compulsory and voluntary parts of the Childcare Register); ensure a Disclosure and Barring Service check is carried out for all staff working directly with the children (compulsory and voluntary parts of the Childcare Register).

p.1

Outcome of the visit

At the monitoring visit on 12 December 2013 the inspector concluded that the welfare requirement notices and notice of actions to improve had been met. Having considered all the evidence, the inspector is of the opinion that at this time the setting is making good improvement overall.

p.1

Overall effectiveness of the improvement and outcomes for children

Through documentation used at the setting and through discussion and observation at the monitoring visit the inspector concludes that the setting has demonstrated good progress in making improvements in the areas identified in the welfare requirement notice and notice of actions to improve.

p.2

Overall effectiveness of the improvement and outcomes for children

The provider has worked hard to ensure that all the areas identified at inspection as needing improvement have been met. A system is in place to ensure that appropriate checks are completed to determine adults suitability to work with children. A record of all Disclosure and Barring Service check reference numbers, the dates they were obtained and details of who obtained them is maintained for all staff and volunteers who work at the setting. As a result children are appropriately safeguarded as any adult in regular contact with children have been checked and deemed suitable.

p.2

Overall effectiveness of the improvement and outcomes for children

The provider has updated the risk assessment for outings. The provider and staff are aware of the need to consider all risks associated with an outing prior to it taking place. Vehicles are only used in case of emergencies however, there are sufficient appropriate restraints for staff to use to ensure that children remain safe while being transported in a vehicle. All staff now have a current paediatric first aid qualification this enables the provide to ensure that children remain safe on school runs or any outings.

p.2

Next steps

Having considered all the evidence the inspector is of the opinion that at this time:

p.2

Next steps

 The setting has made good improvement. The next visit will be a full inspection.

p.2

Next steps

I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your setting. If you have any further queries please contact us on the number at the top of this letter.

p.2

Next steps

Susan Gregory HMI National Director, Inspection Delivery

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion