Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Dalton School
Summary
John Ashley (lead), David Halford, Elaine Maloney
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
4 Dec 2013
- Inspectors verified
David Halford, Elaine Maloney, John Ashley
- Leadership and management AI-checked
Requires improvement
- Overall effectiveness verified
Requires improvement
- Previous overall verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
HD5 9HN
- Name on report verified
Dalton Junior, Infant and Nursery School
- URN verified
131849
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.
- OverallRequires improvement
- Leadership and managementRequires improvement
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Pupils with a visual impairment make good progress in their learning because they are well supported by skilled staff and appropriate resources. p.1
- Pupils enjoy reading and make good progress in this area. p.1
- This provision, alongside the breakfast club, which is very well attended, especially by pupils eligible for pupil p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The achievement of different groups of pupils, including those with lower ability or with complex needs, in reading, writing and mathematics has been too uneven over time. p.1
- The proportion of teaching that is good or better has not been sufficiently high over time to ensure pupils make good progress. p.1
- This is because planning has not always taken full account of the needs of different groups of pupils. p.1
- Not all teachers adapt their teaching, available support and resources during lessons to ensure that pupils of all abilities reach or exceed expected levels. p.1
- Not all staff have the required knowledge and understanding to cater for the small number of pupils with more complex needs, so that they make similar progress to their peers. p.1
- Leaders have not yet succeeded in ensuring that all teachers plan more precisely to meet pupils’ varying needs, so all can make good progress. p.1
- Not all groups of pupils, including those with complex special educational needs, have reached or exceeded expected levels, particularly in writing and mathematics, although pupils who attend the visually impaired provision make consistently good progress, sometimes exceeding expected levels, for example, in reading. p.4
- Children make good progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage but for some pupils in Key Stages 1 and 2, progress has been uneven over the past three years. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Reading & phonics13
“Pupils enjoy reading and make good progress in this area.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,386
- shorter than usual (typical 3064)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 17%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Dalton Junior, Infant and Nursery School Mayfield Avenue, Dalton, Huddersfield, HD5 9HN
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3
p.1
This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because
The achievement of different groups of pupils, including those with lower ability or with complex needs, in reading, writing and mathematics has been too uneven over time. The proportion of teaching that is good or better has not been sufficiently high over time to ensure pupils make good progress. This is because planning has not always taken full account of the needs of different groups of pupils. Not all teachers adapt their teaching, available support and resources during lessons to ensure that pupils of all abilities reach or exceed expected levels. Not all staff have the required knowledge and understanding to cater for the small number of pupils with more complex needs, so that they make similar progress to their peers. Leaders have not yet succeeded in ensuring that all teachers plan more precisely to meet pupils’ varying needs, so all can make good progress.
p.1
The school has the following strengths
The headteacher, supported by a newly formed senior and middle leadership team and governing body, has now set a clear direction for the school. There is high staff morale. Pupils with a visual impairment make good progress in their learning because they are well supported by skilled staff and appropriate resources. Children make good progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage. Pupils enjoy reading and make good progress in this area. The spiritual, moral, social and cultural development of pupils and the partnership with parents are strengths of the school. Pupils feel safe.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed a total of 24 part lessons during the inspection and saw 20 teachers and one visiting sports coach. Three lessons were jointly observed with members of the senior leadership team. Two learning walks were conducted. Meetings were held with the headteacher and the senior leadership team, middle leaders, pupils and two members of the governing body. A telephone conversation was held with the local authority representative who monitors the school’s work. Inspectors listened to individual pupils read both in and out of lessons. Two groups of pupils discussed their lesson experiences with an inspector. Inspectors observed pupils on the corridors, in assemblies, in the dining room, sports hall and out on the playground at break times. Inspectors took account of 41 responses to the staff questionnaire and 42 responses to the on- line questionnaire for parents (Parent View). An inspector attended and observed a meeting held
p.2
Information about this inspection
by a group of 12 parents in school. Inspectors observed the school’s work and considered a range of documents, including the school development plan, and its report on how the school is performing, governing body documents, curriculum policy documents and policies relating to safeguarding, child protection, attendance and behaviour.
p.2
Inspection team
John Ashley, Lead inspector Additional Inspector David Halford Additional Inspector Elaine Maloney Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
This is a larger than average-sized junior, infant and nursery school. The majority of pupils are of White British heritage and the proportion from minority ethnic backgrounds is below the national average. There are a few pupils learning English as an additional language. The school provides for eight pupils with a statement of special educational needs who attend the school’s specially resourced provision for pupils with special educational needs, who have a visual impairment. The proportion of pupils supported at school action is above average, while the proportion supported by school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is below average. The proportion of pupils eligible for the pupil premium is above average. The pupil premium is additional funding for those pupils who are known to be eligible for free school meals, children from service families and those children who are looked after by the local authority.
p.3
Information about this school
The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress. There have been recent changes to the school’s leadership structure to include a recently appointed assistant headteacher as part of the senior leadership team. The school holds a breakfast club each morning. The school is part of the Almondbury School Partnership group. This consists of one local high school and six local primary schools.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Increase the proportion of teaching that is good or better, so that all groups of pupils make better progress in reading, writing and mathematics, by: - making sure teachers use assessment information about pupils’ abilities in literacy and numeracy to plan activities, resources and staff to support and meet the needs of all groups of pupils - ensuring that pupils know the levels they have achieved and their targets in each subject - making sure that precise marking tells them how well they are doing and what they need to do to make further improvements.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Ensure leaders improve staff knowledge and understanding about how best to meet the needs of pupils with more complex needs, so that they are fully included and make good progress by: - making sure that information about this group of pupils is fully shared with all staff - making sure that appropriate training in meeting the needs of these pupils is provided for all staff - regularly checking that teachers plan more precisely to meet all pupils' varying needs.
p.3
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Not all groups of pupils, including those with complex special educational needs, have reached or exceeded expected levels, particularly in writing and mathematics, although pupils who attend the visually impaired provision make consistently good progress, sometimes exceeding expected levels, for example, in reading. Children make good progress in the Early Years Foundation Stage but for some pupils in Key Stages 1 and 2, progress has been uneven over the past three years. Children enter the Nursery class with skills that are below the expected levels for their age, sometimes well below expectations. They quickly make progress and respond well to the routines. They enjoy taking part in musical rhythm sessions where they learn taking turns and making letter sounds together. In the Reception class, all pupils, including those with special educational needs learn letters and the sounds they make when put together, because of carefully pitched teaching and support.
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Good progress in reading is made in Key Stage 1 with pupils exceeding the national average for the end of Year 1 check on their knowledge of letters and the sounds they make (phonics). While pupils in Key Stage 1 enjoy practising and improving their skills and knowledge, for example, in sequencing the days of the week, some do not make the progress they might because tasks are either too difficult for some or not challenging enough for others. In a Key Stage 2 literacy lesson, pupils enjoyed working together when planning the writing of a section of a story, which promoted strong spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Progress was seen when the most able pupils suggested corrections to each other. While lower- ability pupils enjoyed the activity and were involved in the lesson, it was not certain what progress they were making because their precise targets were not made clear to them.
p.4
The achievement of pupils requires improvement
Progress for disabled pupils, those with special educational and more complex needs has varied over time but is now showing signs of improvement in reading, writing and mathematics, but there are still wide gaps in levels of attainment compared to their peers. The most able pupils are beginning to achieve at the higher levels, for example, in mathematics in Year 6, but not yet in line with national expectations. The small number of pupils from minority ethnic groups and those learning English as an additional language make similar progress to their peers. Pupils who are supported through the pupil premium funding, including those known to be eligible for free school meals remain about one term behind their peers in reading and two terms in writing and mathematics by the end of Year 6 which is an improvement on last year’s outcomes.
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
Inspectors agree with the school that teaching is showing clear signs of improvement but that the proportion of good or better lessons has not been high enough over time. Not enough attention has been given to meeting the precise learning needs of pupils with different levels of ability, for example, in developing their reading and writing skills, or in supporting those with more complex needs in how best to learn. As a result, some lesson plans lack learning objectives for this group of pupils with details about the right level of support, resources and activities needed. Some teachers are not using assessment information about pupils’ abilities in literacy and numeracy well enough in planning to meet the varying needs of groups of pupils. Comments in some teachers' marking does not always refer to the specific targets set for each pupil. This means that they do not always know what they have achieved or what they need to
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
achieve next. Interventions for pupils with complex and challenging needs have not been as successful because work and support provided to improve their literacy skills, for example, has not led to them making better progress in the classroom. In a mathematics lesson, which pupils enjoyed, the learning objective was too broad and did not include precise enough targets for the less able and most able pupils. When all pupils were asked to record their answers on mini whiteboards following a teacher's question, it was difficult to assess whether some pupils had understood the question or not, or whether the task was too easy for some. Teaching in the Early Years Foundation Stage is good because staff work well together to assess children’s needs. They use this information well to plan activities that include all children, for example, in order to develop their independence. Good teaching in Key Stage 1 was observed when pupils were given opportunities to practise
p.4
The quality of teaching requires improvement
their joined-up writing, or to try out new words when constructing sentences that included the verbs, ‘was’ or ’were’. Information about what they already knew was used well to help them make further progress. Learning was particularly good in a Year 5 mathematics lesson because the teacher’s plans built effectively upon pupils current skills, knowledge and understanding. Questioning was used skilfully to ensure each pupil understood the terms describing different angles and how to use a protractor to measure them. Marking informed pupils about what they had achieved and what each needed to do next to improve. Following the lesson, the most able pupils spoke knowledgably about their work and knew their targets. Interventions for pupils who have a visual impairment are well planned and focused on their specific needs. For example, precise teaching in their use of Braille and related technology engenders pupils’ great self-confidence and trust in the adults who support them. Pupils make
p.5
The quality of teaching requires improvement
good progress as a result, through the small steps taken in their learning.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils is good
Inspectors agree with the school’s leaders that behaviour is good, especially more recently with improving teaching and better use of methods to manage pupils’ behaviour in lessons. All staff manage behaviour consistently well and deal calmly with any issues. They feel that further support and training would be helpful in order to better meet the needs of those pupils with more complex needs. Pupils have good attitudes in class and enjoy their lessons. They are keen to talk about their work and pupils respond well by making better progress when marking is clear and helpful to them. Occasionally, they are unclear about their learning targets. This is because teachers’ comment in marking do not always explain to them how to improve. Pupils move around the large site responsibly. They are keen to demonstrate ‘safe walking’ to staff on duty. Younger pupils are well supported by older peers if there are any upsets on the
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils is good
playground. Pupils are friendly and polite to visitors. There were very few concerns expressed about poor behaviour by parents or by pupils. The overwhelming majority of parents are positive about what the school does to manage pupils’ behaviour. A group of parents meets regularly at the school and provide strong support for each other as well as the school. There is little if any bullying. There have been only a few fixed-term exclusions over time and incidents are recorded and followed up carefully, with parents if required. Pupils state that they feel safe in school, including those who attend the visually impaired provision. Pupils can attend a regular indoor club in the morning before school and at lunchtime, run by the learning mentor if they find it difficult to manage outdoor playtimes. This provision, alongside the breakfast club, which is very well attended, especially by pupils eligible for pupil
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils is good
premium funding, adds to the community feel of the school, promoting strong spiritual, moral, social and cultural development.
p.5
The leadership and management requires improvement
Although senior leaders have a strong system for checking on pupils' progress, they have not ensured that over time, class teachers have regularly taken account of the assessment information on pupils' different ability levels, so that precise targets can be set and activities are pitched to match their different needs. The situation is improving now because senior and middle leaders have set a clear direction for the school which is shared by all. This has led to high staff morale and an increased capacity to bring about improvements. The restructured governing body and close monitoring by the local authority have provided good support for leaders in moving the school forward. Involvement in the Almondbury Partnership of Schools has led to a sharing of good practice. Senior and middle leaders check the quality of teaching regularly, providing feedback that results in the provision of further training. Support for newly qualified teachers has led to the improved
p.6
The leadership and management requires improvement
teaching of literacy. However, further improvements are needed to ensure that all teachers make better use of the assessment information available to inform their planning and to set targets. Although the school’s specially resourced provision for pupils with special educational needs who have a visual impairment is well led, leaders know that they need to share information about pupils with complex needs more fully and to ensure that staff are better equipped to meet these pupils’ needs. The school’s review of its work is based upon clear evidence, recognising strengths and areas to improve and is linked to the school's improvement plan. The school’s curriculum provides equal opportunities for most pupils to develop their reading, writing and number skills in other subjects, for example, in science, where pupils record their findings about the effects of exercise on the heart. The school provides good experiences in sport and physical education, both in and out of school
p.6
The leadership and management requires improvement
hours and pupils benefit from enriching educational visits, residential holidays and after-school clubs, such as the knitting club. The additional Primary School Sport funding for physical education and sport is well used to improve provision both in and out of school and for external coaches. As a result, an increasing number of pupils take part in and enjoy team sports, such as football and rugby. The partnership with parents is a strength of the school. Safeguarding policies and practice at the school meet requirements and staff receive updated training in safeguarding. The governance of the school: Following a review of governance overseen by the local authority, the governing body has made the necessary changes in its membership and structures since the last inspection, to better support and challenge the school to bring about improvements. It has formed a committee to check on pupils’ standards and achievement so that governors are well
p.6
The leadership and management requires improvement
informed, holding leaders to account for the school's performance. Systems for the appraisal of teachers are closely linked to teachers’ performance in the classroom and rewards for good teaching. There has been a review of the allocation and spending of the pupil premium funding so that it is now targeted more precisely to meet the needs of those eligible pupils.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 131849 Local authority Kirklees Inspection number 430886
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 500 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Michelle Malik Headteacher Gillian Lindop Date of previous school inspection 14 June 2012 Telephone number 01484 226577 Fax number 01484 226578 Email address office.dalton@edukirklees.net guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion