Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Stanfield Care Services Limited in Norfolk

Inspected 12 Dec 2013 · published 29 Jan 2014 · URN SC451152

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Clive Lucas

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    12 Dec 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Clive Lucas

  • URN verified

    SC451152

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−12Mixedmore positive than 27% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progressclearpositiveeffectivelypositivelysettled
Criticisminadequatefailednot metdeclinedlacklow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings803w−12
  • What needs to improve41w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
841
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 4
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 85%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 11%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC451152 Inspection date 12/12/2013 Inspector Clive Lucas Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 16/07/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

This home provides care and accommodation for up to four young people with emotional and behavioural difficulties. The home is owned by a private organisation.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .

p.3

Progress

At the previous inspection the home was judged to be providing an adequate standard of care for young people. Since that inspection the Registered Manager has left that post to become the Responsible Individual. The assistant manager has taken on the manager role. Her application to become Registered Manager is in progress.

p.3

Progress

At the previous inspection shortfalls were identified relating to recruitment checks, some areas of record keeping, the administration of medicines, staff training and consultation with young people, parents and social workers. All requirements and the majority of recommendations from the previous inspection have been met. There are now clear records to show that staff are subject to appropriate checks before beginning work. This helps to reduce the risk of young people being looked after by adults who may pose a risk to them. Records of the administration of medicines are now full and show that young people are given their medicines as prescribed. Staff have had recent training in this area. There are also full and clear records of incidents of restraint and young people being missing from care. These show that staff manage these incidents appropriately to help safeguard young people. There has been a significant reduction in the number of restraints and incidents of young

p.3

Progress

people going missing from care. This reflects a more settled period in the home since the Summer.

p.3

Progress

Since the previous inspection staff have had training in working with young people who self-harm so that they have more knowledge in this area. The home has been open for just over one year and there has been a number of new staff. Overall the number of staff with National Vocational Qualification at level three is low, but staff are either working towards it, or have been recently registered for it. Recently some new staff have been employed with this qualification and significant experience in residential child care. There is consultation with young people, their parents and social workers through regular surveys. This information is looked at by the Responsible Individual when he visits the home to do monthly monitoring. It is also reviewed by the manager on a regular basis. Issues are identified and acted upon. Young people say that they are listened to and that staff and the manager act on their views. They give examples of positive changes that have been made as a result

p.4

Progress

There have been changes to the way that risk assessments are kept, so that they are more readily accessible for staff. Staff have a sound awareness of the areas of risk for young people. While risk assessments are clear and are regularly reviewed and read by staff, in some areas they do not have as much information as they could. While they are a useful tool for staff to work effectively with young people, the lack of clarity does reduce this to a degree. However, this is countered by the staff's sound awareness of the individual young people.

p.4

Progress

Young people speak very positively about the changes to the home since the previous inspection. They say that they are listened to by staff and the home feels like a safer place. Staff spend more time with them and they describe this as 'quality time'. They play games with staff and have individual key worker time as well as regular residents meetings. They say that this helps them to speak to staff about how they feel. Young people also say that there is more structure in the home, they are encouraged to do homework and are learning independence skills.

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.4

Recommendations

 implement a proportionate approach to any risk assessment, this relates to ensuring that risk assessments provide clarity in all areas. (NMS 4.5)

p.4

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.5

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion