Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Jan 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mark Williams

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mark Williams

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−9Mixedmore positive than 20% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivestrengthsaccuratelyaccurate
Criticismweaknessesnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
680
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566855 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: gail.hill@cfbt.com

p.1

Mr Richard Sanderson Headteacher St Wulstan's and St Edmund's Catholic Primary School and Nursery Poulton Road Fleetwood Lancashire FY7 7JY

p.1

Edmund's Catholic Primary School and Nursery, Lancashire

Following my visit to your school on 10 December 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Edmund's Catholic Primary School and Nursery, Lancashire

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Edmund's Catholic Primary School and Nursery, Lancashire

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. Leaders should take further action to:

p.1

Edmund's Catholic Primary School and Nursery, Lancashire

 revise the school improvement plan so that intended successes in terms of outcomes for pupils are quantified  ensure checks on the success of actions occur at more regular points during each term  ensure observations of teaching and learning undertaken by senior leaders always articulate how teaching has made a difference to the learning of pupils.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I held meetings with you, your newly formed senior leadership team, the Chair of the Governing Body, and representatives of the local authority and the diocese. The school improvement plans were evaluated and a number of lesson observation records scrutinised. I also toured the school.

p.1

Main findings

The outcome of the October section 5 inspection came as no surprise to you as headteacher or to the Chair of the Governing Body. This is because, since your arrival at the school in September 2012, you have identified the school’s strengths and weaknesses accurately. The improvement plans you have put into place are rightly seen by senior leaders, governors, diocese and local authority as the correct ones for the school. However, as we discussed, the plans do not always quantify the successes you intend for pupils.

p.2

Main findings

Your new senior leadership team is taking increased responsibility for implementing the improvement plans. Some successes are evident already. For example, all pupils bar one in Year 6 have made at least expected progress in mathematics from their starting points in September 2013. However, as we agreed, the checking of the success of actions taken is not as regular as it should be. Some senior leaders have left the checking of signs of success or otherwise until now. This is too late in the day should issues arise that could have been addressed earlier in the term.

p.2

Main findings

As you are acting with urgency, so too is the governing body. Already, more probing questions are being asked about the gap between pupils for whom the pupil premium is intended and other pupils. The first stage of the review of governance – as recommended by the October 2013 inspection - is scheduled for mid-December 2013.

p.2

External support

To support the school in raising standards the local authority has provided additional funding. Governors, the local authority and the diocese are keenly aware that, because of the newness of the senior leadership team, much is falling on your shoulders as headteacher. To this end, the local authority is to provide training for the senior leadership team in order to equip them to make wholly accurate judgements about the quality of teaching and learning so that observation records always articulate how teaching has made a difference to the learning of pupils. This training has the potential of increasing leadership capacity within the school further.

p.2

External support

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children's Services for Lancashire and to the Catholic Diocese of Lancaster.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion