Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Wath Victoria Primary SchoolOfsted inspection, 12 Dec 2013

Inspected 12 Dec 2013 · published 22 Jan 2014 · URN 106887

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Ofsted inspected Wath Victoria Primary School on 12 Dec 2013, led by John Rutherford. The overall judgement was Requires improvement. Ofsted published the report on 22 Jan 2014. Source: Ofsted (Open Government Licence v3).

Summary

Requires improvement

John Rutherford (lead), Lynne Davies

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    12 Dec 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    John Rutherford, Lynne Davies

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    S63 7AD

  • Name on report verified

    Wath Victoria Primary School

  • URN verified

    106887

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+35Mostly positivemore positive than 86% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingimprovedexceptionallystrongimprovingeffectivelywell-plannedstrength
Criticisminadequaterequires improvementweakweaknessesnot sufficientlynot yetpoorserious

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings184w+69
  • What needs to improve1984w+31

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,081
shorter than usual (typical 2803)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 6%What needs to improve 67%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

Wath Victoria Primary School Sandymount Road, Wath-upon-Dearne, Rotherham, South Yorkshire, S63 7AD

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Inadequate 4 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Requires improvement 3 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

 The majority of pupils make progress at the expected rate. Very few exceed this.  Less-able pupils, which include many supported by the pupil premium, are not achieving enough in lessons. They are not, therefore, catching up with other pupils quickly enough.  Not enough teaching is good or outstanding.  In some lessons, work is not adapted precisely enough to provide the correct level of challenge for all pupils.  In some lessons, pupils are insufficiently motivated or involved in learning activity.  Behaviour and attitudes are not consistently good. They sometimes slip when pupils are required to work independently.  Leaders and managers have only recently eradicated weak teaching and good teaching is not sufficiently established to ensure that all pupils can accelerate their progress and catch up on the standards they should be attaining.

p.1

The school has the following strengths

 The headteacher, governing body and recently established senior leadership team have successfully raised the quality of education from a very low level.  Their success in improving achievement so far shows they have the capacity to raise standards further.  Provision and children’s progress are good in the Early Years Foundation Stage.  Pupils’ behaviour and attitudes to work have improved significantly.  The learning mentor provides exceptionally good support for pupils with significant behavioural and emotional difficulties.  Attendance is improving rapidly from a very low level and is now close to the national average.  Senior leaders plan good additional support for the lowest achieving pupils and those who are disabled or have special educational needs.  A new, more interesting curriculum motivates pupils and helps them to extend their reading and writing skills.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed teaching and pupils’ achievement in 17 lessons.  Inspectors held discussions with groups of pupils, heard pupils reading in Years 2 and 3 and looked at exercise books from each class.  Inspectors held discussions with the headteacher, the deputy headteacher, four members of the senior leadership team, the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Interim Executive Board (IEB), six parents and carers and two representatives of the local authority.  Inspectors read management documents relating to school evaluation, pupils’ progress, the monitoring of teaching, improvement planning, pupils’ behaviour, attendance and safeguarding.  Staff were not required to complete questionnaires for this inspection. No parents or carers responded to the online survey, ParentView.

p.2

Inspection team

John Rutherford, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Lynne Davies Additional Inspector

p.2

Full report

In accordance with section 13 (4) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that the school no longer requires special measures.

p.3

Information about this school

 This school is similar in size to most primary schools nationally.  Almost half of the pupils are supported by pupil premium funding, which is well above average. The pupil premium is extra money provided by the government for pupils known to be eligible for free school meals, those in local authority care and those with a parent in the armed forces.  An above-average percentage of pupils receive support at school action and school action plus levels for their disability or special educational needs. A very small number are supported with a statement of special educational needs.  The previous inspection placed the school in special measures because of serious concerns about the quality of education and pupils’ achievement. The headteacher took up her position in the term following this inspection. She has established a new senior leadership team and led significant changes to staffing.  The school has been governed by an IEB since going into special measures.

p.3

Information about this school

 The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set a minimum expectation for pupils’ attainment and progress.  The school is scheduled to become a sponsored academy in spring 2014.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Enable more pupils to accelerate their progress above the expected rate by establishing more good and outstanding teaching. There should be a particular focus on:  planning lessons and group activities that have a much sharper focus on the learning of new skills  enthusing pupils with more interesting lessons  raising the levels of challenge for all groups  ensuring all pupils are involved and learning during whole-class teaching sessions.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Ensure that the less-able pupils, including those who are supported by the pupil premium, achieve more in lessons by:  setting much more focussed, short-term targets for the learning of new skills  planning activities that more precisely meet their particular learning needs  introducing more challenge into their learning activities  improving their skills in working independently.

p.3

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage make good progress because stimulating learning activities are well planned to match their needs and interests. Most activities help them to develop their language skills. Their skills and knowledge are broadly in line with national expectations by the time they go into Key Stage 1.  Between Years 1 and 6 the majority of pupils make progress at the expected rate in reading, writing and mathematics. Standards are therefore broadly average at the end of Key Stages 1 and 2. Few pupils make better than expected progress by the end of Year 6 because they do not receive a continuous provision of good and outstanding teaching and their progress dips in some classes.  Pupils supported by the pupil premium are around one term behind other pupils in reading, writing and mathematics at the end of Key Stage 2. Their progress is improving but this is at the same rate as all pupils; therefore they are not yet catching up.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 The less-able pupils are helped to accelerate their progress with well-planned programmes that meet their individual needs. This includes disabled pupils and those with special educational needs, many pupils supported by the pupil premium and other pupils in the lowest achieving 20%. Their progress, however, is slower in lessons because activities are not precisely planned to help them make the necessary short steps of progress towards their personal goals.  In general, pupils make better progress in reading than in other subjects. This is because teachers have improved their skills in teaching the basic skills of reading and how to understand text. The teaching of letters and sounds has improved considerably in the younger age groups and, for the older pupils who have missed out on this, there are effective programmes of support to help them catch up.  Pupils’ writing is improving rapidly. This is helped by teachers providing a wider and more

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

interesting range of purposes for writing in many subjects, for example protecting the rain forest and researching the impact of building developments in the locality.  Many pupils are beginning to achieve well in gymnastics because leaders use the government’s primary school sports funding effectively to buy specialist physical education teaching.  Parents are happy with the improvement in their children’s progress. They say that ‘the academic side is much more driven now; there is much more push’.

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Teaching is improving and there is no longer any inadequate teaching. While there is good and outstanding teaching, there is not enough of it to help pupils sustain good progress between Years 1 and 6. Teaching therefore requires improvement overall.  Pupils’ progress slows down in lessons that are not sufficiently focussed on the learning of a new skill. Some activities therefore repeat previous work or are no more than time-filling.  In these lessons, activities are not interesting or challenging enough to motivate pupils to work hard and accelerate their progress. They spend too long sitting listening without challenging questions or tasks to keep them focused on learning their new skills.  The less-able pupils, in particular, are often not challenged enough and are rarely required to tackle problems without support.  Pupils’ progress is much better in lessons where questions and group activities are carefully

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

planned to provide the correct level of challenge for all pupils. Pupils are taught to work independently and to apply themselves to challenging tasks.  Interesting activities linked to topic work or current affairs motivate pupils to work hard and make better progress. For example, in the week of Nelson Mandella’s funeral, pupils researched, discussed and wrote about how he created harmony in a divided society. This helped pupils to extend their reading and writing skills and their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development. Many, for example, understood the importance of tolerance and forgiveness in bringing about a cohesive community. Parents, rightly, see this work as a strength in their children’s education.  Teachers, with good support from senior leaders, use information about pupils’ progress to identify those who are falling behind and to plan additional support which helps them to achieve

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

more. Not all of the pupils sustain this improved achievement because work in many lessons does not link closely enough to their support.  Teaching is good in the Early Years Foundation Stage. The teaching of letters and sounds is a particular strength because it is supported by interesting practical activities that help the children to understand as well as to say the words. The children, therefore, make rapid progress in their early reading development.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement

 In discussion with inspectors, parents highlighted a significant improvement in behaviour since the previous inspection, but also pointed out that more work is still required. Their view matches inspection evidence.  Incidents of significant misbehaviour occur but they are much less frequent than before and are managed expertly by the learning mentor and staff.  Pupils’ attitudes to work and behaviour in lessons are mostly positive. The main exceptions are a minority of pupils who have not developed the ability to settle to work independently without direct supervision from adults.  The majority of pupils are keen to learn. They deepen their understanding by discussing their work with adults and other pupils and they persevere with challenging problems until they master them. This helps them to accelerate their progress.  The learning mentor provides very effective support, guidance and firm challenge to pupils with

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement

significant behavioural and emotional developments, and to their families. As a result the attendance of these pupils has improved considerably, their misbehaviour is greatly reduced and most of them make the same progress as all other pupils.  Other staff have learned much by working with the learning mentor, therefore there is a consistent approach to improving pupils’ behaviour across the school. The learning mentor keeps detailed records of all misbehaviour and poor attendance and his accurate analysis helps staff to target support where it is most needed.  Through well-planned work on other cultures and the use of computers, pupils have a good understanding of the detrimental effects of racism and cyber-bullying and how to avoid them. In general, they feel safe from bullying and school records support their view that it is rare and always dealt with effectively.

p.5

The leadership and management requires improvement

 Senior leaders and the governing body manage the performance of teachers well. They have removed inadequate teaching and promoted the strongest teachers into positions from which they help others to improve. Their support for teachers needing improvement is a key strength of the school.  Leaders’ evaluation of teaching and achievement is accurate. They know where weak areas remain and have sharply focused plans to tackle them.  Leaders monitor the progress of groups of pupils in detail and know precisely where to target additional support to ensure that every child has an equal opportunity to succeed.  Based on this information they have used pupil premium funding effectively to provide eligible pupils with resources, additional teaching and access to constructive out-of-school activities that they would not otherwise have. These pupils are therefore accelerating their progress. However, this is no faster than other groups because some teachers have not had the training they require

p.5

The leadership and management requires improvement

on how to build on additional support in their lessons.  Leaders have introduced a rich, interesting curriculum and they increase its positive impact through intensive week-long programmes of study in one subject. This enables pupils to extend their skills considerably in a short time and it helps teachers to deepen their knowledge of the subject and how to teach it more effectively. A recent art week, for example, has resulted in pupils demonstrating a range of new skills in very attractive and carefully produced work.  Parents are kept well informed about their children’s targets and how to support their learning at home. Written responses from parents, following target-setting meetings, show that the school has gained the support of a large number who are willing to help in this way.  The school meets safeguarding requirements.  The local authority has made a strong contribution to the school’s recovery. They have

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

monitored its progress closely and tailored additional support accurately to its priorities for improvement.  The governance of the school:  The IEB provides strong governance which has helped the school to remove its causes for concern. They monitor the progress of the school closely, often visiting to see the impact of new methods on teaching and achievement.  They give senior leaders appropriate support, especially with difficult staffing situations. They also ask searching questions when they see that some pupils are not making enough progress.  They make a strong contribution to planning for the school’s future, especially in relation to the forthcoming conversion to academy status. They have ensured that this process has not diverted school leaders away from the essential task of improving pupils’ achievement.  The IEB has been helped to fulfil its responsibilities by the headteacher who has kept them

p.6

The leadership and management requires improvement

fully up to date with clear information about the school’s strengths and weaknesses.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 106887 Local authority Rotherham Inspection number 427678

p.8

School details

This inspection was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. The inspection was also deemed a section 5 inspection under the same Act.

p.8

School details

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 272 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Alan Richards Headteacher Ruth Bessant Date of previous school inspection 22 February 2012 Telephone number 01709 760103 Fax number 01709 760576 Email address wvjirbessant@rgfl.org guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion