Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Pamela Fearnley
- Postcode verified
TW8 0BJ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 973
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ben Foley Headteacher Green Dragon Primary School North Road Brentford Middlesex TW8 0BJ
p.1
Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 12 December 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Primary School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take action to:
p.1
Primary School
sharpen the post-Ofsted action plan action by stating who will monitor actions and the success criteria at each check point so leaders, governors and the local authority can evaluate their impact increase the urgency and effectiveness of the actions being taken to improve the quality of teaching in Key Stage 1 and improve the quality of teaching mathematics across the school so it is consistently good or better in all year groups. Tribal 1–4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5307 Direct email : rachel.evans@tribalgroup.com
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you and other senior leaders, the Chair of the Governing Body and two other governors, the Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2 phase leaders and a representative of the local authority, to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I spoke informally with pupils when I joined you in making some brief visits to lessons. I evaluated your post-Ofsted action plan and reviewed other relevant documentation.
p.2
Context
There have not been any staffing changes since the last inspection.
p.2
Main findings
You have responded effectively to tackling the areas for improvement highlighted in the section 5 report and you are determined to bring about improvement as quickly as possible. The school action plan addresses the priorities identified in the last inspection and clearly outlines the steps you are taking to make improvements. However, the plan does not identify the staff responsible for monitoring actions or outline the success criteria at each check point which will support you to hold staff accountable.
p.2
Main findings
Since the last inspection you have changed the way teachers mark pupils’ work and this is helping to improve their learning. Learning goals and success criteria are shared with pupils, against which they assess their learning. Coaching by the phase leaders to support teachers’ planning has improved pupils’ engagement in lessons.
p.2
Main findings
Teachers have started using information from pupil progress checks to plan work so it is better matched to pupils’ abilities. However, work for most able pupils is not always sufficiently challenging. The school rightly intends to evaluate the use of additional adults and the quality of their work so their support of pupils with different abilities is improved.
p.2
Main findings
Teachers have developed pupils’ extended writing skills by refocusing how they use ‘writing target sheets’ in English and across subjects. Evidence from pupils’ work books shows that their extended writing is improving. You rightly recognise reading is an area the school still needs to develop further. The English coordinator has produced ‘reading target sheets to improve how teachers’ identify and tackle pupils’ weakness in reading. These will be piloted in Year 6 before being cascading across the school.
p.2
Main findings
The school has focussed on improving teachers’ use of their mathematics work scheme. Teachers are starting to adapt activities so most able pupils are beginning to be better challenged. However, mathematics teaching is not good enough in all year groups.
p.2
Main findings
Target setting has improved and the progress of individuals and pupil groups is now being tracked through a half–termly pupil progress meeting. Pupils’ targets are ambitious but realistic and teachers are more accountable for pupils’ progress.
p.3
Main findings
You have made good use of external support to improve the accuracy and reliability with which senior and phase leaders monitor teachers’ work. They have received coaching on how to judge the quality of teaching, improve the accuracy of teachers’ assessment and how to evaluate the progress pupils make when looking at work in pupils’ books. However, the impact of the action being taken to improve teaching in Key Stage 1 is not rapid or effective enough.
p.3
Main findings
An external review of governance, completed just before this visit, has identified the strengths and improvements governors need to make to challenge leaders more effectively. Governors have received data training so they can ask pertinent questions to assess pupils’ progress. A governors’ school visit policy is in place and provides them with a helpful strategy to enable them to see first-hand how well teaching is improving and the impact of leaders in bringing this about. Governors recognise the importance of having an external perspective and they are drawing on reports from the local authority to hold the school’s leaders to account.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
You are well supported by the local authority. The support from the school improvement officer is helping leaders to accurately monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of teaching and its impact on pupils’ achievement. This has been done by completing teaching and learning reviews with the local authority officer. Leaders have also been trained how to coach staff to improve their classroom practice. The local authority continues to help the school to evaluate the impact of its actions through termly Raising Achievement Plan meetings
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hounslow.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion