Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Giles Junior School

Inspected 13 Dec 2013 · published 22 Jan 2014 · URN 117306

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

Tusha Chakraborti (lead), John Ubsdell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Dec 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    John Ubsdell, Tusha Chakraborti

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    SG1 4JQ

  • Name on report verified

    Giles Junior School

  • URN verified

    117306

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+39Positivemore positive than 90% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectiveimprovedsuccessfullyoutstandingmake good progressconfidentstrong
Criticismnot alwaysinadequateweaknessesnot consistentlyrequires improvementseriousnot high expectationsinsufficient

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings416w+88
  • Leadership833w+38
  • What needs to improve1025w+13

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,197
shorter than usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 14%Leadership 27%What needs to improve 34%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

Giles Junior School Durham Road, Stevenage, SG1 4JQ

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

 Teaching is not consistently good enough to ensure that pupils make good progress year on year in reading, writing and mathematics.  Pupils’ achievement has not been consistently good over time, although it is currently improving.  Teachers do not always set tasks that are demanding enough for pupils of all abilities, especially the more able.  Marking does not consistently help pupils to improve their work and pupils are not given time to practice and learn from their mistakes.  Pupils have insufficient opportunities to improve their writing skills in different subjects.  Teachers are not doing enough to help pupils to develop good handwriting and presentation skills.  Subject leaders, particularly those new to the role, are not sufficiently involved in the drive to improve teaching and raise standards.

p.1

The school has the following strengths

 The school has improved after a period of instability. Improvement has been sustained in the current school year.  The headteacher, supported by the governing body, checks teaching rigorously. Their action has improved progress, achievement and the quality of teaching.  Pupils behave well. They develop a good understanding of the cultural diversity within the school and value others’ beliefs and ways of life.  Governors have an accurate view of the school’s effectiveness. They are confident in holding leaders to account for the school’s performance.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 The inspectors observed 14 lessons, one of which was a joint observation with the headteacher. The inspectors also heard pupils in Years 3 and 6 read.  Meetings were held with groups of pupils, members of the school’s staff, the Chair of the Governing Body, two other governors and a representative of the local authority.  The inspectors took account of 47 responses to the online questionnaire (Parent View), results of a parental survey carried out by the school and 20 responses to the staff questionnaire. They also sought the views of parents through informal discussions at the start of the school day.  The inspectors looked at a range of documents including: the school’s own data on pupils’ current attainment and progress, the school’s evaluation of its performance, school improvement planning, documentation relating to teachers’ performance over time and records relating to safeguarding and pupils’ behaviour.

p.2

Inspection team

Tusha Chakraborti, Lead inspector Additional Inspector John Ubsdell Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 The school is smaller than the average-sized primary school.  The large majority of pupils are of White British heritage. An average proportion of pupils come from a wide range of minority ethnic backgrounds but very few are at an early stage of speaking English as an additional language.  The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium, which provides additional funding for children in local authority care and pupils known to be eligible for free school meals and others, is above average.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs supported through school action is above average, and the proportion supported through school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is average.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.  Many pupils join or leave the school part way through the academic year.

p.3

Information about this school

 The school has experienced significant changes in staffing over the past two years.  The school is a member of the local schools’ consortium, which includes many primary and secondary schools and an outreach base.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching to good or better and raise achievement further by ensuring that:  all teachers use assessment information effectively to ensure that work is not too easy or too hard, particularly for the more able pupils  when teachers mark pupils’ work they make it clear what the pupils need to do to improve, and that they are given time to act upon the advice given  greater emphasis is placed on the development of pupils’ presentation and handwriting skills  pupils are given more opportunities to write at length for a range of purposes and audiences in all subjects.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Strengthen the capacity of leadership by involving new subject leaders more fully in the drive to improve teaching and pupils’ achievement.

p.3

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Attainment and rates of progress have fluctuated too much over the past three years. This is partly the result of many staff changes, as well as considerable variation in the quality of teaching. This has lead to inconsistent progress made by all groups of pupils, particularly the more able. Furthermore, there have been a significant number of pupils joining the school, who sometimes do not have sufficient time to achieve what they were capable of by the time they take the Year 6 tests, despite the help they received at the school.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Pupils’ attainment at the end of Key Stage 2 in 2011 and 2012 dipped to below national averages. The school responded rapidly to resolve the problem by improving the quality of teaching through an effective teacher-training programme. Consequently, attainment rose in 2013 to average in reading, writing and mathematics.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 These improvements are being sustained. Lesson observations, the school’s own data on pupils’ progress and targets for 2014 and the work seen in pupils’ books show that progress in all subjects has accelerated over the past two years. Pupils are currently, on track to reach at least similar standards to those of 2013 at the end of Year 6.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Pupils enjoy guided reading sessions and learn to read successfully. They are gaining an increasing understanding of different styles of writing. They read from an extensive range of texts, including newspapers and stories. They are becoming increasingly confident in analysing how effectively the authors use language to make stories interesting.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Progress in writing is not as rapid as in reading. This is because pupils do not get enough opportunities to write at sufficient length or in sufficient depth in different subjects. Pupils do not develop their handwriting and presentation skills to a consistently good standard.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs make similar progress to that of others. This is because they are supported increasingly well in one-to-one and small-group sessions which effectively help them to learn.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 There are no significant differences in the achievement of different ethnic groups. Pupils who speak English as an additional language make similar progress and achieve standards comparable to those of their classmates.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 The support for pupils eligible for the pupil premium has improved over the past year. A range of effective support helps pupils on an individual basis. Consequently, most of the eligible pupils have made faster progress in reading, writing and mathematics than previously, narrowing the gap in attainment rapidly between them and their classmates. In 2013, the gap in attainment between those eligible for the pupil premium and others has narrowed to less than one term from two terms in 2012.

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Although rates of progress are improving, teaching overtime has not ensured that pupils’ make good progress or that they acquire key skills in literacy and numeracy rapidly enough.  Teachers do not always plan or check regularly enough to make sure that work is not too easy or too hard for pupils. There are some missed opportunities to challenge pupils in order to extend their skills, knowledge and understanding. Consequently, pupils do not achieve as well as they could, especially the more able.

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Teachers often do not have sufficiently high expectations of how much progress pupils can make in lessons. They do not promote pupils’ handwriting and presentation skills to ensure that the work pupils complete in their books is always the best they can do. Nor do they not ensure that pupils extend their writing skills sufficiently through writing for different purposes in different subjects.

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Although marking is regular, the comments teachers write in pupils’ work books do not always provide clear pointers for improvement. Furthermore, teachers do not ensure that pupils are given time to act upon the guidance. As a result, pupils often repeat the same mistakes.

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Where teaching is good, pupils learn rapidly. In the more successful lessons, teachers display good subject knowledge. They provide a range of interesting activities and use effective questioning to check on pupils’ understanding and build on what pupils’ already know. For example, in a successful science lesson in Year 3, the teacher used demanding questioning to make sure that pupils gained good understanding of different types and properties of soil.

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 There is a positive climate for learning in lessons and pupils respond readily to tasks, showing interest and enthusiasm. Relationships are good and behaviour is managed well in all classes. In most lessons, the teaching assistants are used effectively to give pupils the help they need to improve their work.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils are well mannered and friendly. They are courteous to and respectful of each other and adults. They try hard and usually concentrate well, although, very occasionally, they lose focus when lesson activities are not demanding enough.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 There are good procedures for adults to manage pupils’ behaviour. These are applied consistently well and pupils respond positively to them. Pupils are proud of the training they receive in ‘The Leader in Me’ programme and the work they do as leaders. This helps them to grow up as confident learners and to develop mature attitudes to learning and high self-esteem.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils feel safe at school and most parents who responded to the questionnaire agree with their children’s views. Pupils have a good understanding of how to stay safe, including when using the internet, or on the road, or in case of fire. They are considerate and concerned about the safety of others because these issues are often included in lessons and in the school’s work with parents.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils show good understanding of different forms of bullying including name-calling, racism and cyber-bullying. They say that there is very little bullying in their school. They added that, should it occur, they were certain that the staff would deal with it quickly and fairly.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils have a strong sense of responsibility. Older pupils successfully fulfil their role as play leaders and peer mediators. The leaders from each class, supported by other pupils, recently organised the ‘Leadership Day’ in school, which was attended by delegates from different parts of the United Kingdom, Europe, Middle East and Africa. Pupils led the day, explaining their work as leaders to the delegates. This action demonstrates clearly their increasing leadership and social skills.

p.5

The leadership and management are good

 The headteacher, together with governors and staff, communicates high expectations and is successfully driving improvement in teaching and achievement. Leaders manage the difficulties arising from the many pupils who join the school throughout Key Stage 2 through rigorous monitoring of progress. During their short time in school, their progress improves, although these pupils do not always achieve what they are capable of. Nevertheless, there is a clear trajectory of improvement across the school for all groups of learners.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The school has an accurate view of its successes and what still needs to be improved. The positive impact of the actions that leaders have already taken to improve teaching and achievement demonstrates the school’s capacity for further improvement.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The headteacher has successfully established effective systems which are helping the school to operate efficiently. Subject leaders are determined to improve the quality of teaching and to speed up pupils’ progress. Nevertheless, newly appointed subject leaders are at an early stage of developing their current roles to further improve the quality of teaching and learning and it is too soon to evaluate the impact of their current actions. The headteacher is supporting the middle leaders effectively in developing their leadership skills.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The headteacher checks regularly on the quality of teaching and pupils’ progress and sets teachers on-going, demanding targets for improvement, which are always linked closely to the attainment and progress of pupils in the class that they teach. Teachers receive good opportunities for professional development. Their improvement targets are linked closely to national teaching standards and staff at all levels are always held to account for the progress that pupils make.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Pupils’ enjoyment of learning is enhanced by a range of clubs and visits to places of interest. Their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is promoted well through assemblies, religious studies and topic work. The programme ‘The Leader in Me’ helps pupils to develop their thinking and independent learning. This makes a strong contribution to their behaviour and attitudes to learning.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The school leaders have ensured that there is no discrimination of any kind within the school. They have made good progress in ensuring equality of opportunity, but are aware that there are still a few questionable areas, including ensuring that work is equally challenging for all pupils.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The additional primary school sports funding had been used to appoint a sports apprentice from Stevenage Sporting Futures Team. This initiative has provided an increased number of sporting activities at lunchtime and after school and is enhancing pupils’ sporting skills, fitness and well- being.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The local authority has provided effective support for the school, which has helped it to improve. Leaders and governors have worked well with the local authority to achieve this.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The governance of the school:  The governors have an accurate understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the school. They have received appropriate training and play an active role in the school’s development. Governors support leaders in the monitoring of teaching and learning; they observe lessons themselves and share scrutiny of pupils’ work with leaders. They ask challenging questions during meetings and ensure senior leaders are held to account for all aspects of the school’s performance. They ensure that teachers are rewarded for good performance and underperformance is tackled effectively to raise achievement. They are aware of the results pupils attain in national tests and how they compare nationally. The governing body is very effective in managing the school’s budget. The finance committee’s work is a model of best practice, which is shared with other schools within the local authority.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

Governors monitor the impact of pupil premium funds, ensuring that they are correctly focused on raising the attainment of these particular pupils. Governors ensure that the procedures for safeguarding pupils meet the national requirements.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 117306 Local authority Hertfordshire Inspection number 425254

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Junior School category Community Age range of pupils 7–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 222 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Karen Wheatland Headteacher Heather Davies Date of previous school inspection 27 September 2011 Telephone number 01438 353374 Fax number 01438 359115 Email address admin@gilesjm.herts.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion