Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Quality Protects Children Ltd in Sheffield
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
11 Dec 2013
- Inspectors verified
Stella Henderson
- URN verified
SC066010
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection. p.3
- Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making inadequate progress . p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ensure that staff working within the home know and implement the local authority and home's policy in relation to children going missing and their role in implementing that policy (NMS 5.2) p.4
- improve the recording of significant events relating to children accommodated in the home. p.4
- This is with specific reference to the recording of notifications. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment3
“Risk assessments are not updated to reflect emerging risks.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 778
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC066010 Inspection date 11/12/2013 Inspector Stella Henderson Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 12/06/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
This privately run children's home provides care for up to four long-term placements for children.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making inadequate progress .
p.3
Progress
The last full inspection of the home was undertaken in June 2013 where the overall effectiveness of the home was judged to be good.
p.3
Progress
The home has met one recommendation raised at the last inspection which was to ensure young people's views on their care are better documented. This enables young people to be confident that their opinions are heard. A second recommendation to improve the home's development plan is largely met. Significant changes have occurred within the home, however, and this is therefore still work in progress.
p.3
Progress
A requirement to include consultation with young people, their parents and placing social workers as part of the Regulation 34 monitoring has not been met. This means a valuable contribution to improving the quality of care in the home and driving forward further improvement is lost. This requirement is raised again.
p.3
Progress
Young people continue to feel safe at the home. One young person said they feel wanted, valued and happy to be there. Another young person commented that they feel relaxed living at the home. Staff have achieved some improvements for young people in a short period of time, such as reducing the risk of child sexual exploitation, involvement in criminal activity and better overall health.
p.3
Progress
However, the home has been unable to sustain good practice. Important documents such as the home's own placement plan are not always signed and dated. Risk assessments are not updated to reflect emerging risks. In one instance, the home's risk assessment and action plan referred to a different young person. This impacts on young people being able to enjoy good quality care and have their needs fully identified and met.
p.4
Progress
Young people generally choose not to go missing from the home. The guidance for staff is confusing, however, giving different times for when the police should be contacted. This means that young people may not get the assistance they need to be returned home quickly and safely.
p.4
Progress
There are few notifiable incidents. Where these occur the provider ensures that Ofsted is notified in a timely fashion. However, the quality of the recording in notifications does not provide the regulator with sufficient information with regard to background details and plans of action. This makes it difficult to assess whether young people have been fully protected and supported.
p.4
Progress
The home's Registered Manager is currently absent. Deputising arrangements are in place, however, and are found to be suitable.
p.4
Statutory Requirements
This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.
p.4
Reg. Requirement Due date
(2001) maintain in respect of each child who is accommodated in a children's home a record in permanent form which is kept up to date and signed and dated by the author of each written entry (Regulation 28)(1)(b)(c) 10/01/2014
p.4
Reg. Requirement Due date
(2001) ensure the system referred to in paragraph (1) shall provide for consultation with children accommodated in the home, their parents and placing authorities. (Regulation 34)(2)(3) 10/01/2014
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s): ensure that staff working within the home know and implement the local authority and home's policy in relation to children going missing and their role in implementing that policy (NMS 5.2) improve the recording of significant events relating to children accommodated in the home. This is with specific reference to the recording of notifications. (NMS 24)
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.6
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion