Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 Jan 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Christina McIntosh

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Christina McIntosh

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+5Mixedmore positive than 27% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingrapid progresseffectiveeffectivelypositiveclearsecureimproving
Criticismfailedweaklacksinconsistentgapsnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
895
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566863 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: jbennett@cfbt.com

p.1

Mr Timothy Glendinning Headteacher Beaconside CofE Primary School Hutton Hill Penrith Cumbria CA11 8EN

p.1

School, Cumbria

Following my visit to your school on 17 December 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School, Cumbria

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School, Cumbria

Senior leaders and governors are not taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection and plans are not sharply focused on rapidly bringing about improvement. The school should take immediate action to:

p.1

School, Cumbria

 increase the pace of improvement by better use of the action plan  ensure actions taken have maximum benefit on pupils’ progress  ensure leadership responsibilities are delegated to have maximum effect  make links with good and outstanding schools.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I met with you, other senior leaders, the Chair and nine other members of the Governing Body, and a representative from the local authority, to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated the school action plan made since the previous inspection. I met with six pupils from Years 4, 5 and 6 to talk about recent changes in the school and look at examples of their work. You and I visited each classroom to meet pupils and staff and look at the improvements to teaching and the school environment put in place since the last inspection .

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection you have employed a temporary special educational needs co- ordinator for two terms to cover maternity leave.

p.2

Main findings

Although you, the governors and the staff are determined to make Beaconside a good school the action plan lacks a sense of urgency to improve the quality of teaching and leadership. The plan has no short-term targets to measure progress and the tasks identified are too vague. Leaders were given a very clear focus on where specific help is needed but have failed to translate this into an effective plan.

p.2

Main findings

Although work has been done to improve the teaching of mathematics, the impact of this has not been assessed by leaders. All teachers have a mathematics target as part of their performance management process so that they are accountable for its development within their classes. A new programme for teaching mathematics is becoming more firmly embedded. Work has been done to ensure that levels of pupils’ ability are secure and shared with staff so they can address any gaps in knowledge or skills. Key stage meetings are helping spread good practice and get greater continuity across each key stage. You have scrutinised the pupils’ mathematics books and given feedback to teachers about what is working well and areas to develop so they can adapt teaching to meet the differing needs of the pupils. However, some more able pupils say that they sometimes have to wait for help in class which prevents them from making rapid progress or being challenged to

p.2

Main findings

achieve at a higher level. The level of support that pupils receive is inconsistent.

p.2

Main findings

Vocabulary banks and class displays have been created to help pupils use a richer variety of language in their written work and teachers have continued to use a wide range of reading materials to develop pupils’ vocabulary. Work has been done on developing literacy skills through topic work and some staff have been coached on guided reading and improving the assessment of reading. However, there is much more to be done on ensuring consistency in writing for purpose, style and neatness of handwriting. The marking system is weak and pupils are not given dedicated time to correct and improve their work independently. As a result they do not learn from their mistakes. Middle leaders should be used more effectively to monitor and develop their subjects across all the key stages.

p.2

Main findings

The headteacher, deputy and governors need to accelerate improvement through celebrating the positive and giving better guidance on areas that still require improvement. The governing body is keen to move forward and increase its understanding of the school, but currently is over-reliant on the headteacher to inform their views and is not challenging enough.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The local authority knows the school well and is aware of the performance and the standards your pupils achieve but has been unable to provide sufficient support to move the school forward at the required pace. The local authority has tried to support your governors and offered links other schools to develop leadership and improve the quality of teaching. So far you have had too little contact with this link school.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Cumbria and the Diocese.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion