Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Jan 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tim Bristow

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Tim Bristow

  • Postcode verified

    NG4 3LE

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+68Positivemore positive than 66% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedclearimproving
Criticismnot precise

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings263w+61
  • What needs to improve309w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
572
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 46%What needs to improve 54%

Full report text

Mr Lee Shilton Acting Headteacher Priory Junior School Priory Road Gedling NG4 3LE

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Priory Junior School

Following my visit to your school on 13 December 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Priory Junior School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Priory Junior School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Priory Junior School

 sharpen up some of the activities and targets in the school improvement plan so that it is clear to those monitoring the development that outcomes for pupils are strengthening where they most need to.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, members of the governing body, a representative from the local authority and a National Leader of Education (NLE) who is working with the school to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated. Assessment information, marking and the school’s records of teachers’ performance were scrutinised. I briefly visited all the classes in the school where teaching was taking place to observe the teaching and learning. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9153 Direct email : naik.sandhu@serco.com

p.1

Context

The acting headteacher remains responsible for the school while the headteacher is away. One teacher will be leaving the school at the end of this year. The school is currently recruiting a replacement for this teacher.

p.2

Main findings

The school action plan covers all the necessary areas that need improving to get to good. Leaders and teachers have already strengthened the level of challenge in lessons and improved the quality of marking. There is a growing proportion of good teaching. One reason for this is that the acting headteacher is carrying out regular and effective checks on pupils’ work, their progress and teaching. Staff are benefiting from training that is becoming better tailored to strengthen their teaching. Some of the targets and actions in the plan are not as precise as they need to be so that the leaders and governors will know when they have achieved success.

p.2

Main findings

Governors have embarked on training to strengthen their knowledge and regular visits by some of them mean that they know the school well. They are becoming increasingly effective at questioning school leaders and have volunteered to have an external review of governance so that they can be better custodians of the school.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The local authority has helped the school by brokering the support of a NLE and checking the improvements being made by the school. The NLE has been particularly helpful in strengthening the leadership skills of the acting headteacher who is proving to be increasingly effective.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Nottinghamshire.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion