Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Forshaw, Clare Louise

Inspected — · published 9 Jan 2014 · URN EY285367

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Susan Gregory

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Susan Gregory

  • URN verified

    EY285367

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−7Mixedmore positive than 21% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseconsistentlyeffectivelyclear
Criticisminadequate

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings330w−23
  • What needs to improve221w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
550
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 45
Average sentence
24 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%What needs to improve 40%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD Telephone: 0300 123 1231 Fax: 0300 123 3159 Minicom: 0161 618 8524 Email: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk Web: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Outcome of monitoring visit for provision judged as inadequate

An Ofsted inspector, Nikki Whinton, carried out a monitoring visit of your provision on 11/12/2013. This visit follows on from your inspection where the provision was judged to be inadequate.

p.1

Outcome of the visit

As a result of our inspection on 05/11/2013, we sent you a welfare requirements notice.

p.1

Outcome of the visit

We also sent you four notices to improve. The welfare requirements notice required you to: demonstrate records are easily accessible and available, with particular reference to records of children’s personal information, records of children’s attendance and records of public liability insurance. The welfare requirements notice had a completion date of 10 December 2013.

p.1

Outcome of the visit

The notices to improve with a completion date of 10 December 2013 required you to: keep records of the following and retain them for a period of two years: the name, home address and date of birth of each child who is looked after on the premises, the name, home address and telephone number of a parent/guardian/carer of each child who is looked after on the premises and a daily record of the names of the children looked after on the premises and their hours of attendance; ensure there is a clear and well-understood policy and procedures for assessing any risks to children’s safety, and review risk assessments regularly, with particular reference to the family dog; undertake a risk assessment of the premises and equipment at least once in each calendar year, and immediately, where the need for an assessment arises; ensure that all necessary measures are taken to minimise any identified risks.

p.1

Outcome of the visit

The notices to improve with a completion date of 5 February 2014 required you to: improve the use of observations and assessment and quality of teaching to consistently provide a challenging and enjoyable experience for each child. Having considered all the evidence, the inspector is of the opinion that at this time you are making satisfactory improvement overall.

p.1

Overall effectiveness of the improvement and outcomes for children

An inspector visited you on 18 December 2013 to monitor your progress. The inspector discussed with you the steps you had taken to address the action raised in the welfare requirements notice and notice to improve. The inspector checked the revised layout of your provision, observed interactions between yourself and the children and scrutinised your documentation.

p.2

Overall effectiveness of the improvement and outcomes for children

The inspector found that you had reviewed and updated your risk assessments, including with reference to your dog, in order to effectively promote children's safety and well-being. Safety gates had been installed to separate your dog from the minded children. In addition, you informed the inspector that your dog is no longer permitted off the lead when on outings, if minded children were present. Legally required documentation, including records of children’s personal information, children’s attendance and records of public liability insurance were available and accessible for inspection.

p.2

Next steps

Having considered all the evidence the inspector is of the opinion that at this time:

p.2

Next steps

 The childminder has made satisfactory progress in addressing the points for improvement. The next visit will be a further monitoring visit.

p.2

Next steps

I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your childminding service. If you have any further queries please contact us on the number at the top of this letter.

p.2

Next steps

Susan Gregory HMI National Director, Inspection Delivery

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion