Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

–

Inspected 13 Nov 2013 · published 9 Jan 2014 · URN SC370956

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Amanda Ellis

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    13 Nov 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Amanda Ellis

  • URN verified

    SC370956

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−74Very criticalmore positive than 4% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progressrobusteffectivelyaccurate
Criticisminadequatefailsfailednot metcompromisedfailuredeclinedincomplete

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings679w−73
  • What needs to improve191w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
867
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 50
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 70%What needs to improve 20%About the inspection 10%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC370956 Inspection date 13/11/2013 Inspector Amanda Ellis Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 23/07/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

The home is privately owned and is registered to provide care for a maximum of four young people with emotional and behavioural difficulties.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making inadequate progress .

p.3

Progress

At the last inspection in July 2013 the overall rating for the home was judged as good, with one requirement and two recommendations set within the inspection report.

p.3

Progress

Since this time the manager has implemented systematic monitoring to ensure that health care records reflect accurate records of medical treatment and first aid and actions taken by staff. Such monitoring ensures young people receive good quality of care in relation to the meeting of their health needs.

p.3

Progress

The manager has initiated measures to improve the maintenance and decoration of the home. However, this fails to address the recommendation set at the last inspection with several areas of the home in need of maintenance. For example, the patio door remains broken and the removal of bars to some windows on the ground the floor has not been undertaken, therefore leading to the home having an institutionalised appearance. Internally, further areas of improvement were identified, such as floors throughout the home are worn and dirty, walls and doorframes remain unrepaired after damage and the kitchen units were in need of replacement. Additionally, the exterior of the home is in need of attention, with unkempt gardens and an un-surfaced driveway.

p.3

Progress

Records of allegations against staff remain incomplete. They do not provide a clear and comprehensive account of how the allegations are followed up, or contain details of actions taken or decision-making. This means monitoring the progression and quality of investigations is unclear and fails to demonstrate robust safeguarding practice.

p.4

Progress

Staff training is available on general topics such as safeguarding, restraint, fire safety awareness, health and safety, medication and restraint, although not all staff have completed these courses. In addition, training is not provided on specific issues such as self-harm, to ensure that staff are able to meet specific needs of some young people. Because of the shortfalls in staff training, the welfare and protection of young people is inadequately safeguarded.

p.4

Progress

Care planning, risk assessments and behaviour management plans are individualised. However, risk assessments in relation to self-harming behaviours are not reviewed in a robust or comprehensible way. This means staff do not have the necessary clarity to effectively support young people. Consequently, young people’s welfare and safety is potentially compromised.

p.4

Progress

Since the last inspection, there have been changes with the staff team. New team members have been transferred from the provider’s other homes. Additionally, the home uses agency staff to provide additional staff support. Young people say that sometimes they don't know which staff will be working in the home. This means young people may not receive consistency in care.

p.4

Progress

The home has made inadequate progress since the last inspection based on the failure to address the recommendations set at the last inspection. Additional shortfalls have been identified which have the potential to have a negative impact on young people’s safety and welfare.

p.4

Statutory Requirements

This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.

p.4

Reg. Requirement Due date

(2001) ensure that the children's home is conducted so as to promote and make proper provision for the welfare of children accommodated there. This specifically relates to staff training in relation to self-harm and ensuring sufficient permanent staff (Regulation 11 (1) (a)) * 03/01/2014 (2001) ensure that all parts of the children's home used by children are kept clean and reasonably decorated and maintained (Regulation 31 (2) (e) ) * 03/01/2014

p.4

Reg. Requirement Due date

(2001) ensure the registered person maintains written records of any allegation of abuse or neglect, and of the action taken in response. (Regulation 16 (2) (d)) * 03/01/2014

p.5

Reg. Requirement Due date

*These requirements are subject to a compliance notice

p.5

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.5

Recommendations

 ensure staff actively promote the welfare of children living in the home, with specific regard to ensuring risk assessments are regularly reviewed and updated. (NMS 4.1)

p.5

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.6

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion