Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 8 Jan 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Daniell

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Daniell

  • Postcode verified

    CB24 8UA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+18Mostly positivemore positive than 34% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveconsistentlystrongconfidentsecureclearlyaccurate
Criticisminconsistentnot alwaysconcernnot yetnot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
702
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
24 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Stephen Ellison Headteacher Cottenham Village College High Street Cottenham CB24 8UA

p.1

College

Following my visit to your college on 5 December 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the college since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

College

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the college was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in September 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

College

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The college should take further action to:

p.1

College

 ensure that members of the governing body are fully confident in using information on students’ progress to challenge senior leaders  evaluate the progress made against the college action plan and the impact of these actions  ensure that teachers’ planning meets the needs of all groups of students, and the quality of their marking is consistently effective in helping students move up to the next level of attainment.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I held meetings with you and other senior leaders, ten students from Key Stages 3 and 4, eight members of the Governing Body and an external Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 6799169 Direct email : mathew.mitchell@serco.com

p.1

PROTECT-INSPECTION

consultant to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated the college improvement plan. We also visited a number of lessons briefly to look at the quality of teaching and teachers’ planning, and the marking of students’ work.

p.2

Main findings

During our visits to lessons, I observed the majority of students engaged in their learning. My scrutiny of teachers’ planning shows that teachers who you judge to require improvement are not planning in sufficient detail to ensure that their teaching meets the needs of all students in the class. The quality of marking is inconsistent and students told me that teachers’ marking does not always detail clearly enough how they can improve their work.

p.2

Main findings

You college action plan meets requirements and covers key areas which aim to drive improvement. However, you have not yet evaluated progress against the plan and the impact of the actions taken thus far.

p.2

Main findings

You have started to increase the proportion of good and better teaching, and encourage discussions about effective practice through your teaching and learning community sessions. You acknowledge the need to improve students’ outcomes, particularly in English, mathematics and modern foreign languages, which is reflected through your detailed raising achievement plans for these subjects. You also acknowledge the need to secure consistently strong leadership at middle leadership level.

p.2

Main findings

Recently published information on students’ progress shows that girls, middle attaining students and those students entitled to pupil premium funding make less progress than they should. Your own information gathered from recent practice GCSE examinations for students in Year 11 shows that you continue to face challenges in raising standards so that they compare favourably with those nationally.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body clearly wants students to achieve their best, and acknowledges its key role in holding senior leaders to account in order to raise standards further. They have started to monitor more closely subjects which are the cause of concern, and recognise the need to analyse more thoroughly the performance of different groups of students in the college.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

You have drawn on the support of external consultants to support you in producing a more accurate self-evaluation document, and they have worked productively with

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

your heads of faculty, particularly with the heads of English and mathematics. The local authority is providing much-needed support to the governing body to strengthen their understanding of information of students’ attainment and progress.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Cambridgeshire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion