Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 6 Jan 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sue Frater

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sue Frater

  • Postcode verified

    TQ1 3PE

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+5Mixedmore positive than 27% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingeffectivegood progressrobustconsistentlyenjoyfeel safeclear
Criticismnot yetabsencedeclinelackdisruptionbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings217w−20
  • Leadership1031w+7

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,248
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 17%Leadership 81%About the inspection 2%

Full report text

Mrs Lyndsey Kane Deputy Headteacher Westlands School Westlands Lane Torquay TQ1 3PE

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Westlands School

Following my visit to your school on 5 December 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills, to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of Westlands School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in June 2013.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with the deputy headteacher in the absence of the headteacher, the Chair of the Governing Body and another governor, a representative from the local authority, senior and subject leaders, and students, including sixth form students. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s action plans were evaluated. In addition, short visits were carried out with the deputy headteacher to a number of lessons, mainly in English, mathematics and science.

p.1

Context

Since the section 5 inspection the school has met with a representative from the Department for Education to discuss arrangements for becoming a sponsored academy. The headteacher has been on compassionate leave for the past few weeks. Tribal 1–4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Governors and senior leaders are now monitoring and evaluating the progress of all students rigorously across the school in order to address the decline in standards in recent years. They are being supported in this work by a National Leader of Education and staff from his outstanding teaching school. The new system for monitoring students’ progress is too recent, however, to have prevented a further decline in the GCSE results for 2013 which fell below the government’s floor standards.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Appropriate targets are now being set to raise the aspirations of students and expectations of staff. Students’ progress towards end-of-year targets is monitored each half term and suitable intervention is provided to tackle any underachievement. The school is carrying out joint moderation of the marking of students’ work with staff from the teaching school. Consequently, teachers’ assessments, which were previously overgenerous, are becoming increasingly accurate.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Students, including those in the grammar stream of this bilateral school, are set according to ability across subjects. Prior to the section 5 inspection, and in the absence of robust progress data and targets, teachers did not adjust their lessons sufficiently to meet the differing learning needs within the set. In the most effective lessons, teachers are now using the targets and their assessments to plan lessons that more closely meet the students’ needs. For example, in a Year 11 top set English lesson involving analysis of the language used in poetry, the teacher set expectations at three different levels according to the students’ target grades. In a Year 12 mathematics lesson, the teacher discussed the different outcomes expected of different students.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

In a Year 7 English lesson, the teacher asked the students to record questions about the author’s techniques that they did not understand. She adjusted her lesson to make sure that all the questions were answered. Not all teachers are checking students’ understanding enough during lessons and adapting the activities, pace and their questions to promote consistently good progress for all students.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Most teachers are marking students’ work more frequently than previously and they are now writing comments to help students to know what to do to improve it. Some of the comments, however, are not linked specifically to the criteria for the next level or grade to help the student to reach it.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Students enjoy practical activities such as science investigations, role-play and discussing pertinent topics in personal, social and health education. Across subjects, however, they are not encouraged to develop the necessary skills to work on their own, for example through investigating, researching and presenting. Sixth form students say more could be done to prepare them for their A-level courses by developing their independence in the main school, and this was seen to be the case.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Students report that, in some lessons, the lack of active learning strategies results in some students, especially boys, not being engaged in their learning and causing disruption through off-task talking. Students continue to feel safe in school and safeguarding procedures meet requirements.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The leadership skills of senior and middle leaders are being developed appropriately to promote and sustain improvement across the school. Subject leaders in English, mathematics and science, for example, are monitoring and evaluating information on students’ progress, students’ workbooks, the quality of teaching and teachers’ planning. However, they are not yet involving students in providing feedback on the quality of their learning. They are beginning to hold teachers to account for the progress their students are making and to identify and provide for the teachers’ professional development needs.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The subject leaders have recently observed good practice in other schools and share this information with their departments. This is helping to raise teachers’ expectations of students, for example more students are being entered for higher grade examination papers. The school has not yet identified the features of good or better practice that it expects to see in all lessons.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Governors are beginning to hold the school to account more rigorously for the standards students reach, and the progress of different groups including those supported by the pupil premium. This is made easier because of improvements in the monitoring and evaluation of students’ progress. Governors are not yet monitoring and evaluating systematically the school’s progress in addressing the areas identified in the section 5 inspection through an action plan. This is proving difficult because the areas are included in separate plans and the plans do not contain measurable outcomes for each half term to check the school is on track to reach its targets. Due to the absence of the headteacher, the action plans have not been shared with the staff to provide clear expectations for them. This uncertainty is not helping to raise staff morale.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

As a result of their external review, governors are aware of the need to review roles and responsibilities within the governing body to support its monitoring role. They are also aware of the need to review roles and responsibilities within the senior leadership team in order to focus on improving the quality of teaching and learning to bring about more rapid improvement in raising attainment.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made: The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose. The local authority has negotiated effective support from the National Leader of Education, the local teaching school and support for staffing issues from its human resources department. During the absence of the headteacher, more time is required from the National Leader of Education to help provide clear direction for the staff.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s action plans are not fit for purpose. There is no overall plan with measurable outcomes by which governors can monitor the school’s progress each half term and make sure the identified areas for improvement are addressed before the school’s next section 5 inspection. There is no mention of how parents and carers will be consulted or how they will be informed about the improvements.

p.4

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school may not appoint newly qualified teachers before the next monitoring inspection.

p.4

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Education Funding Agency, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Torbay. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion