Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 19 Dec 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Nada Trikic

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Nada Trikic

  • Postcode verified

    NN5 7DE

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+87Very positivemore positive than 90% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingrobusteffectivelyeffectiverigorouswell supportedknowledgeablepositively
Criticismlowyet to

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
820
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mr Mark Rapps Headteacher Earl Spencer Primary School Streatfield Road Spencer Estate Northampton NN5 7DE

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 9 December 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in September 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Primary School

 gather robust evidence to show how pupils’ progress is accelerating for all cohorts and groups of pupils to tackle the trend of low standards  explore options that will provide an external perspective on the school’s work to support rigorous self-evaluation and sustainable improvement  ensure that implementation of the governing body’s monitoring plan provides evidence that governors are contributing to school self- evaluation and improvement.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders, the Local Authority Advisor, the Chair of the Governing Body and a parent governor to discuss Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9161 Direct email : ann.morris@serco.com the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated. A range of documentation was reviewed including a Key Stage 2 monitoring report and the report arising from the external review of governance. A ‘learning walk’ was conducted with the headteacher.

p.1

Context

There have not been any significant changes in the school’s context since the inspection.

p.2

Main findings

School leaders and governors have taken immediate action in response to the inspection. The school’s improvement plan has been effectively updated to provide a sharp focus on areas identified for improvement. Actions are clearly linked to attainment and accelerated progress to tackle the trend of low standards in recent years. The plan is supported by clear milestones to check progress. Leaders recognise the importance of compiling robust evidence of pupils’ progress over time. Systems to track, monitor and analyse progress are used increasingly to refine provision, and to check on the impact of intervention strategies.

p.2

Main findings

A high priority is placed on improving teaching quality. Inspection findings have been used to personalise the training and support of identified teachers. Joint planning, team teaching and book scrutiny are used systematically to improve teaching quality. Plans are well advanced for working with a partner school to increase the proportion of ‘outstanding’ teaching. Steps have been taken to strengthen the role of teaching assistants in pupils’ achievement. The performance management process is developing well supported by appropriate training. Work has commenced to strengthen the consistency and quality of marking.

p.2

Main findings

School leaders are knowledgeable about the complex needs of pupils across the school. This work is supported by two assistant headteachers who are completing a national qualification on senior leadership. This has strengthened the focus on the progress of different groups of pupils. Work to improve the attendance of pupils shows some success. The level of attendance is higher than at a similar point last year. The importance of regular attendance is reinforced through the rewards system and communication with parents.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body has responded positively to the external review of governance. The governing body’s monitoring plan has become formalised with links to identified priorities. This work is yet to be embedded to demonstrate that governors are contributing effectively to self-evaluation and improvement. Governors have attended one training session on performance data. They have correctly identified that this aspects requires further input if they are to provide an appropriate level of challenge and support to the school. Leaders and governors acknowledge that external validation of the school’s work is an important aspect for consideration to sustain improvement.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The headteacher works with a local cluster of schools to share and develop good practice. A programme is agreed for joint working with one school to increase the proportion of outstanding teaching at the school. The local authority advisor is in discussion with the school to agree other areas of work for collaboration. This includes access to funding for middle leader training. The advisor fulfils a monitoring role for the local authority; it is expected that a review will take place in the Spring Term, 2014.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Northamptonshire local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion