Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 19 Dec 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sue Frater

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sue Frater

  • Postcode verified

    TR10 8PZ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+64Positivemore positive than 62% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisehighly effectiveexceptionallyvery wellwell plannedeffectiverigorousenjoyconfident
Criticismat riskexclusions

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings962w+62
  • What needs to improve15w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
962
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 98%What needs to improve 2%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs M Hunter Headteacher Penryn College Kernick Road Penryn Cornwall TR10 8PZ

p.1

alternative provision

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 19 and 20 November 2013 to look at the school’s use of alternative provision. During the visit I met with you, senior leaders, the flexible learning coordinator, groups of students and a governor. I spoke to a few parents by telephone and examined a range of documents. I also visited the following providers that your students attend: Andy Blundell Property Maintenance, Cornwall College Duchy College, Elemental UK (water sports centre), Pendennis Shipyard (Freemans) and The Dell Garage.

p.1

alternative provision

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

alternative provision

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Leadership and management of alternative provision ensure that it is exceptionally well planned and integrated into the curriculum. Selected students are able to choose a flexible learning option at Key Stage 4 which includes vocational courses at local colleges of further education and/or extended work placements that sometimes lead to apprenticeships.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The flexible learning option also includes an additional half-day water sports programme for students in Year 10 who are considered most at risk of becoming not engaged in education, employment or training. The programme re-engages them in education through developing skills in learning and working together.  The school’s coordinator for flexible learning provides highly effective support for the students’ progress and safety while they are off-site, and is accountable for their progress across the whole curriculum. The coordinator visits the students in their placements every two weeks and telephones the providers to check the students’ attendance at each session. Students can contact her at any time.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Alternative provision is linked well to school work through the NCFE Certificate in Employability Skills which is taken by the students. Students and providers comment in the students’ log books, which are monitored by the flexible learning coordinator.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Students follow a balanced curriculum that leads to nationally recognised qualifications, including BTEC qualifications at college. As alternative education is a curriculum option, students are able to study for GCSEs at school without missing any lessons. They take GCSEs in the core subjects and in subjects that they select from another curriculum are, such as design and technology or humanities. The core subjects include English, mathematics, science, information and communication technology, physical education and religious education.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The school takes great care in selecting and commissioning alternative provision that matches each student’s needs, interests and aspirations. As a result, most students go on to study full-time at college and some gain apprenticeships.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The school makes effective use of the Education Business Partnership (EBP) in selecting appropriate provision. The EBP carries out all the required safeguarding checks on the providers. The school’s coordinator is rigorous in checking the health and safety of the provision, including risk assessments carried out by the providers, before the students begin their placements. She also makes sure that students are aware of how to keep safe in the workplace.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Providers are very well informed about the students’ academic levels and any medical, social or behavioural needs prior to the placement. They value the help provided by the coordinator in her regular visits, when she discusses with them strategies for supporting the students.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The school has very comprehensive systems for monitoring and evaluating the students’ progress in alternative provision. They include visits to the provision by the school’s coordinator every two weeks which includes checking the students’ log books, and reports written by the providers each term.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Senior leaders evaluate the impact of the provision on the rest of school life each term by monitoring the students’ academic progress across subjects, their reading ages, attendance, and any exclusions and behaviour referrals. The information indicates significant improvements in these areas for most students.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The school’s academic progress tracking system filters information on the flexible learning group in the same way that it does for other identified groups of students. It shows that most students are making at least expected progress and about half the group are making more than expected progress. Where students on BTEC level 1 courses are making more than expected progress, they are moved to level 2 courses.

p.3

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 In 2013, all fifteen of the Year 11 students in the flexible learning option group attained GCSEs in English language and literature, and in mathematics, and all but one also student attained a BTEC award, which is the equivalent of two GCSEs. Only one student was subsequently not in education, employment or training. The school believes that, without the alternative provision, all the students would have been in danger of becoming so.

p.3

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The parents who spoke to me said the provision made all the difference to their child’s engagement in education and employment. They praised the support provided by the school’s coordinator for them and their children.

p.3

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Students enjoy their time at the alternative education placements, particularly as they gain a sense of achievement in the practical activities. They feel they are supported well by the school’s coordinator and by the providers and are confident to ask them for help if necessary. They like the fact that they are treated as adults by the providers and say that this helps them to develop a more mature attitude to school. They realise they need qualifications and a willingness to work hard in order to gain employment.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 engaging the governors in monitoring and evaluating the effectiveness and impact of alternative provision.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion