Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Dec 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Peter Humphries

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Peter Humphries

  • Postcode verified

    B49 6QQ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+47Positivemore positive than 48% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveoutstandingstronglyrobustsupportivesuccessfullypreciseprecisely
Criticisminconsistentnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings422w+41
  • What needs to improve377w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
799
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 45
Average sentence
27 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%What needs to improve 47%

Full report text

Mr P Hyde Headteacher Alcester Academy Gerard Road Alcester Warwickshire B49 6QQ

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Alcester Academy

Following my visit to your academy on 28 November 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Alcester Academy

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in September 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Alcester Academy

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The academy should take further action to:

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Alcester Academy

 ensure that all teachers’ marking gives students precise guidance about how to improve their work especially in science, humanities and design technology  accelerate the rate of progress of Year 11 students eligible for the pupil premium grant, especially in mathematics  accelerate the rate of progress of students in all year groups who are disabled or who have special educational needs, especially in English and mathematics  ensure governors hold all school leaders to account for the progress and attainment of students Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9153 Direct email : naik.sandhu@serco.com

p.1

Evidence

During the visit I met with you, other academy leaders and four members of the governing body to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. You showed me around the academy and visits were made to lessons in Year 11 art, Year 9 English and Year 10 mathematics to observe students’ learning and to look at the work in their books. I looked at a range of documentation, including the school’s information about students’ progress, the school improvement plans, minutes of the governing body and a selection of appraisal documents. I also undertook an extensive work scrutiny with two members of the leadership team.

p.2

Context

Since the inspection in September, you have been appointed as the permanent headteacher. Changes were made to the structure of the leadership team at the beginning of September 2013.

p.2

Main findings

The headteacher, academy leaders and the governing body acted quickly to address the issues for improvement identified in the recent inspection. Academy leaders are taking appropriate and effective action to improve the quality of teaching and learning and increase the rate of students’ progress. Existing good practice within the academy has been shared more widely and extensive personalised training, including coaching, has been provided for all staff including teaching assistants. The academy marking policy has been revised and as a result teachers are better at letting students know precisely what to do to improve their work and students stated that this is helping them make progress. However, as a result of the work scrutiny it was apparent that the quality of marking is inconsistent across subjects and individual teachers especially in science, humanities and design technology.

p.2

Main findings

The headteacher has made appropriate use of human resource procedures for dealing with underperforming staff and expectations have been strongly reinforced. Academy leaders now make staff feel far more accountable for the progress students make in lessons through a robust use of students’ progress data. Frequent tracking of student progress enables the academy to employ effective interventions and support for students not making expected progress. As a result, progress can be seen for the majority of students in most of the subjects. However, the latest information provided by the academy shows that students eligible for the pupil premium grant in Year 11 are not making as much progress as other students in mathematics. In addition, students in all year groups who are disabled or who have special educational needs do not make as much progress as other students in English and mathematics.

p.2

Main findings

Governors meet regularly to discuss the progress and attainment of students and are fully supportive of academy leaders. However, governors are not able to ask searching questions of school leaders and do not always understand the data that is presented to them and rely on school leaders for interpretation.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

Academy leaders are working successfully with local outstanding schools to improve the quality of teaching through extensive training and support packages that are personalised to meet the needs of individual staff.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Warwickshire and the Academies Advisers Unit at the Department for Education.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion