Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Hill House School

Inspected 25 Sept 2013 · published 18 Dec 2013 · URN 116565

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Daniel Towl

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    25 Sept 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Daniel Towl

  • Postcode verified

    SO41 8NE

  • Name on report verified

    Hill House School

  • URN verified

    116565

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−43Criticalmore positive than 8% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisepositivevery highindependentsuccessfullyimprovedclearsafesecure
Criticisminadequateunacceptableerrorsnot yetweaknessesat riskconcernsnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings760w−47
  • What needs to improve147w+7

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
907
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 37%

Full report text

Emergency inspection school and residential report Hill House School Rope Hill, Boldre, Lymington, Hampshire, SO41 8NE

p.1

Reason for inspection

This emergency inspection was conducted at the request of the registration authority for independent schools to look into concerns raised about some aspects of the school’s procedures and practices on matters of welfare, health and safety. It was undertaken at the same time as a monitoring visit of the residential provision which is registered as a children’s home by Ofsted.

p.1

Conclusions

The school has had a significant number of staff changes since the last inspection in July 2012. A new headteacher has been appointed and the leadership team has been re- organised. Roles and responsibilities have been clarified at all levels.

p.1

Conclusions

The school does not meet all the requirements for independent schools. A number of practices and procedures related to welfare, health and safety, and the appointment of staff are inadequate. The new headteacher is aware of what needs to be done and is successfully ‘raising the bar’ of expectations on staff to perform well for the benefit and safety of all the young people. Although there have been recent positive changes, the full impact of these has yet to be seen.

p.1

Conclusions

Continuity of staffing has been a problem for the school. There has been a very high turnover of staff since the last inspection. Although staff speak highly of their induction training, they are not always gaining systematically the skills and knowledge to deal with procedures and to adequately manage critical events. The current training programme is not meeting the needs of staff to allow them to do their jobs to the highest level. The proprietors are already taking steps to implement new procedures for appointing and training staff which have the potential to improve future staff retention and capabilities.

p.1

Conclusions

Staff have received training in safeguarding, though not all are clear enough about who is the named designated person for child protection and exactly what actions they should take if a senior member of staff is implicated in the event of a disclosure about child abuse. Although record keeping on safeguarding matters has improved since the appointment of the new headteacher, the school is not diligent enough in notifying Ofsted where necessary. The school keeps a single staff register to show that appropriate checks have been carried out before staff start work at the school. There are some administrative errors on the register and the school has not ensured, while waiting for an enhanced Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) check, that interim checks are made against the list of people who are barred from working with children.

p.1

Conclusions

Procedures for securing medicines and rigorously recording the administration of medicines, including where errors occur, are inadequate. There is an appropriate number of staff that are trained to administer first aid. However, first aid kits and their content Emergency inspection: Hill House School, 23-25 September 2013 2 of 5

p.1

Conclusions

have not been diligently checked, nor is their position clearly labelled. Health care plans are not yet in place for all young people, though a health profile is completed when they are admitted to the school. The new school nurse has already identified these weaknesses and has a clear plan to take immediate steps to improve the situation. Good steps have been taken to improve the food that young people eat and this is having a positive impact on their health.

p.2

Conclusions

Senior leaders and proprietors have recognised that the use of high-risk physical interventions has reached unacceptable proportions and puts young people at risk. Although the use of strategies such as supine restraints can prevent self-injurious behaviour and keep young people safe, the frequency of using this strategy is not reducing quickly enough. The proprietors have responded by providing training for staff in alternate behaviour management strategies that do not rely on supine restraints. The monitoring of young people's well-being during high-risk intervention strategies is not well recorded.

p.2

Conclusions

Procedures to evacuate the premises in case of fire are not rigorous enough. Although the school has conducted fire drills, these are not regular enough, given the complexity of the site, with several secure areas on different levels and the recent high number of staff changes. Some staff report that they are confused about where they should assemble if there is a fire. Young people have personal emergency evacuation plans in place and staff show a good knowledge of what to do. Some matters relating to the accuracy of fire signs were attended to during the inspection. Fire risk assessments and checks on fire fighting appliances are up to date.

p.2

Regulations’), and associated requirements

Ensure that all staff, especially new starters, are fully aware of all the procedures relating to safeguarding children and young people. paragraph 7 and

p.2

Regulations’), and associated requirements

Ensure that the behaviour management practices rapidly bring about a reduction in the numbers of incidents of supine restraint. paragraph 9

p.2

Regulations’), and associated requirements

Ensure that all staff are fully aware of the procedures for evacuation should there be a fire and increase the frequency of fire evacuation drills. paragraph 13

p.2

Regulations’), and associated requirements

Ensure that all first aid kits have appropriate materials at all times and their location is well signposted. Ensure that the administration of medication is accurate and recorded accurately. paragraph 14

p.2

Regulations’), and associated requirements

Ensure that all staff are checked against the barred list for working with young people and children if the school is not yet in receipt of a DBS check. paragraphs 19(2)(a), and 22(3) Emergency inspection: Hill House School, 23-25 September 2013 3 of 5

p.2

Inspection team

Daniel Towl, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector

p.3

Information about this school

 Hill House is a residential special school near Lymington, Hampshire.  It is owned and managed by Cambian Education Services.  The school opened in 1992 and caters for young people who have autistic spectrum disorder, very complex needs and associated behaviours.  There are 23 students on roll, all of whom have a statement of special educational needs and are placed by local authorities.  The school was last inspected in July 2012. Emergency inspection: Hill House School, 23-25 September 2013 4 of 5

p.3

School details

Unique reference number 116565 Inspection number 429906 DfE registration number 850/6031 This inspection was conducted at the request of the registration authority for independent schools. It was carried out under section 162A of the Education Act 2002, as amended by schedule 8 of the Education Act 2005. Type of school Special school for students who have an autistic spectrum disorder School status Independent school Age range of pupils 11–19 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 24 Proprietor Cambian Education Services Headteacher Kate Landells Date of previous school inspection 4–5 July 2012 Telephone number 01590 672147 Email address kate.landells@cambiangroup.com Emergency inspection: Hill House School, 23-25 September 2013 5 of 5

p.4

School details

guidance 'Complaining about inspections', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.5

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when.

p.5

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.5

School details

inspects to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille,

p.5

School details

please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.5

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion