Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Dec 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Robin Hammerton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Robin Hammerton

  • Postcode verified

    TW5 0QR

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+66Positivemore positive than 64% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisevery wellstrongexcellentrapid progressambitiouseffectiveclearaccurately
Criticismweaknessesbelowrequires improvementgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,105
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Ms L Khalil Headteacher Heston Primary School Heston Road Hounslow TW5 0QR

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school with Cathy Anwar HMI on 27 November 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the third monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are now taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School

 improve the sharpness of lesson planning and delivery, especially in Years 1 to 4, so that all pupils receive work more tightly matched to their assessed learning needs  ensure the new mathematics subject leader has access to expert subject-specific advice.

p.1

School

During the visit, I met with you, other senior leaders, representatives of the local authority and the Governing Body to discuss the action taken by the school. I also evaluated documentation, including data showing the progress and attainment of pupils. We made brief visits together to each class and looked at pupils’ work. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Context

Several new teaching staff, including a new assistant headteacher, began work at the school in September 2013.

p.2

Main findings

After the very turbulent past year, reported in my previous letters, you now say that you are ‘cautiously optimistic’ about the school’s situation. I agree with you. The school is not certain of becoming good by the time of its next inspection, but it has a chance. Since the spring and early summer, there has been a real shift of thinking. You have listened carefully to the local authority, your governors and me, demonstrating considerable resilience and commitment. You now lead the school much more firmly and, creditably, involve many others in leadership. School leaders are better focused, more ambitious, and clear thinking in the most important areas. You inducted new staff this term carefully, so they know what the priorities are. There is evidence of notable improvement in teaching, the curriculum and pupils’ progress. Now, in our conversations, we are considering how to refine systems, which are working. In the past, we had to discuss fundamental change.

p.2

Main findings

The deputy headteacher manages and evaluates assessment data very well. Pupils’ work is now assessed accurately. New senior leaders are making strong contributions. In mathematics, the new interim subject leader has put in place a strong and inventive plan to bring needed improvement. However, he is not a mathematics specialist and it is right that subject-specific support should be arranged for him. Other subject leaders ensure a broad curriculum with all subjects having their place. I was pleased, for example, to note the priority given to physical education, art and music. It was very good to see that younger pupils had responded creatively and with such interest to compositions by Stravinsky, Britten and Grieg. A Year 5 class played recorders together accurately, using notation helpfully.

p.2

Main findings

Lessons engage and interest pupils. Some lessons are, valuably, outdoors. Teachers ask better questions to challenge pupils’ thinking. I also noted student teachers contributing skilfully in lessons. We discussed and agreed that, in Years 1 to 4 in particular, you need to ensure that work set by teachers is sharply focused on meeting the precise, assessed, learning needs of each pupil. In lessons observed today, for example, pupils enjoyed writing instructions and captions in stimulating, lively activities. We saw talk being well used to improve pupils’ vocabulary and confidence, of particular benefit to those for whom English is not the first language. But pupils’ individual learning needs in respect of grammar, letter formation, punctuation and spelling were not as well addressed through these activities as they might have been. This more focused work appears better established in older year groups.

p.2

Main findings

There remains a legacy of underachievement. For example, pupils currently in Years 2, 4 and 6 are at levels in writing and mathematics below where they should be. Year 4 pupils have not all made sufficient progress so far this year, as your excellent tracking systems show. Year 6 pupils, on the other hand, have made a strong start to the year, beginning to catch up lost ground.

p.3

Main findings

In 2013, assessment results in English and mathematics at the end of Year 2 and Year 6 were close to national average, and sometimes above. Many pupils made the expected progress and some did very well, but there were gaps too. For example, boys’ writing remains underdeveloped and mathematics results dropped in Year 6. The results of the phonics tests in Key Stage 1, which indicate how well pupils can link letters and sounds, were below average. Reception pupils’ results were below average, but many children had made rapid progress from their starting points. Your self-evaluation of all of these areas is apt, and you and other leaders have put suitable plans in place, which are being carefully acted upon, to address the weaknesses. The proof of the success of this will be in improved outcomes for pupils.

p.3

Main findings

The governing body continues to contribute very well, helping to shape the school’s improvement. Its chair and vice chair are astute, supportive and very challenging to you and the senior staff. They deserve much credit for the positive change in the school. They are also transforming the governing body itself, expecting more from individual governors, recruiting new members carefully and ensuring that governors’ visits to the school are well focused on important matters.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The progress made reflects very well on the formidable contribution and commitment of local authority officers. As part of a wider review across the borough, the local authority has placed the school on an intensive support programme, as it requires improvement. However, officers are rightly clear that the school must manage itself; the local authority’s correct role now is to monitor and hold the school to account closely, advising and influencing its development from a greater distance.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hounslow.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion