Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

The Gilberd School

Inspected 27 Nov 2013 · published 17 Dec 2013 · URN 137926

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    27 Nov 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Charlotte Evers, Helen Lee, John Ubsdell, Martin Wyard, Roger Waddingham

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    CO4 9PU

  • Name on report verified

    The Gilberd School

  • URN verified

    137926

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+71Very positivemore positive than 58% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisevery wellexcellentmake good progressoutstandingconsistentlyeffectivehigh expectationsimproving
Criticisminadequatenot yetweakerrequires improvementnot consistentlyseriousweaknessesnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1657w+78
  • Leadership793w+58
  • What needs to improve93w+64

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,461
about usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 48
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 50%Leadership 24%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

The Gilberd School Brinkley Lane, Colchester, CO4 9PU

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Not previously inspected This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Students make good progress in a wide range of subjects and are well prepared for the next stages in their education.  Mathematics results at GCSE are consistently high. Students of all abilities make good progress and say they enjoy the subject.  English results are improving and students are achieving well.  Students’ behaviour is good; they work at a good pace in lessons and support each other well.  Disabled students and those who have special educational needs make good progress because the support they are given is very well organised.  The wide range of academic and work-related subjects meets students’ needs very well.  Students’ progress towards challenging targets is monitored very well and extra support for those who need it is very well managed.  The school system for tracking student progress is outstanding.  The headteacher and senior leaders in their vision and clear thinking show an excellent

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

capacity to improve student achievement still further.  Governors are experienced and have a very good understanding of school performance data so that they offer very good support and challenge to school leaders.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 Teachers do not match the work well enough to students’ previous learning in some science lessons.  Achievement in German is not as high as in other languages.  Teachers do not always plan work to challenge all students in the class.  Marking does not consistently show students what to do to improve in all subjects.  Students do not have enough opportunities in class to reflect on their progress.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed 47 lessons, including ten joint observations with members of the senior leadership team. In addition, inspectors made short visits to other lessons, tutor periods and assemblies, and looked at samples of students’ work.  Meetings were held with groups of students, the headteacher, members of the senior leadership team, middle leaders, teachers, and members of the governing body.  Inspectors scrutinised a variety of school documents including the school’s self-evaluation, school development plans, behaviour records, safeguarding records, governing body documents, and documents relating to the management of teachers’ performance.  Inspectors also considered the views expressed in 97 questionnaires returned by school staff, together with the 163 responses submitted by parents to Parent View, the on-line survey.

p.2

Inspection team

Roger Waddingham, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Helen Lee Additional Inspector Martin Wyard Additional Inspector Charlotte Evers Additional Inspector John Ubsdell Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 The Gilberd School is an above-average-sized school for students from 11 to 16. It converted to academy status in March 2012. When its predecessor school, of the same name, was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to be good.  The proportion of students known to be eligible for support through the pupil premium is broadly average. This is additional funding allocated by the government for groups of students, including those looked after by the local authority and those known to be eligible for free school meals.  The number of students from minority ethnic backgrounds is lower than in most schools of this size. The proportion of students who speak English as an additional language is well below average.  The proportion of disabled students and those with special educational needs receiving extra support through school action is below average. The proportion at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is average.

p.3

Information about this school

 The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for the attainment and progress of students by the end of Year 11.  Support to local schools is offered by one staff member as part of the North East Essex Education Partnership (NEEEP).  The school offers work-related training for a very small number of students through provision from Colchester Institute.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Increase the proportion of outstanding teaching by ensuring that:  all teachers plan work to challenge students at the appropriate level, based on their previous achievement  written feedback is given consistently to students in all subjects to indicate what they need to do to improve  students are given regular opportunities in class to reflect on their progress in response to teachers’ comments.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Further raise achievement by:  matching work more carefully to students’ previous learning in science lessons  improving progress in German, especially at the higher GCSE grades.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Students make good progress from their starting points on entry to the school. Standards are improving strongly from the results in 2012, and the proportion of students achieving five good passes at GCSE including English and mathematics is now above average.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Attainment in English has risen considerably in the past year. Changes to the teaching schemes, closer monitoring of teaching and detailed tracking of student progress have all contributed well to the improvement of standards. Progress in 2013 was above average for all students, including the more able, and the gap in performance between boys and girls has narrowed considerably. The school has well-founded evidence to suggest that these higher standards will be maintained in 2014.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Students of all ages achieve well in mathematics. High quality teaching leads to above average progress in all year groups, especially for more-able students. GCSE results are consistently high and the proportions of higher grade passes are significantly above average. Early entry has been used for a limited number of students in both 2012 and 2013. This has not affected their results as the school made sure the students achieved their expected target grades.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Science standards are improving. The 2013 results are in line with the national averages and work seen in lessons shows that the majority of students are making good progress. Standards in German are also improving but results are not yet as high as in other languages, especially at the higher GCSE grades.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Results for students supported by the pupil premium show a clear narrowing of the gap in their performance compared to their peers. In English, Year 11 students were on average one third of a GCSE grade behind in 2013, halving the previous year’s gap. In mathematics, the gap has narrowed from one grade to two thirds of a grade. The school’s arrangements to support these students are increasingly effective and their progress seen in lessons was in line with nationally expected levels for this group.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The progress of students from minority ethnic backgrounds and those who speak English as an additional language is above average, and they achieve well.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The attainment of disabled students and those who have special educational needs is consistently above the national average in both English and mathematics. They make good progress overall because they are very well supported in lessons and their progress is tracked carefully.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Students’ communication skills are well developed. They practise their writing for a good range of different purposes in humanities and personal, social, health and citizenship education (PSHCE) lessons, and reading is developed well through regular opportunities during tutor period. Students develop their numeracy skills very well because of the excellent attention they receive in mathematics lessons to building their confidence.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Year 7 students who have fallen behind make good progress. They are very well supported in their literacy through paired reading opportunities with older students and with support staff, the school’s Accelerated Reading programme and an Easter school.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The school monitors both the attendance and the academic achievement of students educated off-site for part of the school week. They make good progress in their chosen courses.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching is good overall and is improving in several key areas in response to the school’s well- targeted training and support. Planning, questioning and target setting are all strong aspects.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers use their good subject knowledge well to plan lessons that interest students and challenge them appropriately. They use a good variety of activities to involve students in their learning. For example, in a lesson on the environment, a short video clip led to a fast-paced writing task and a detailed follow-up discussion, engaging students’ attention very well.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 In most lessons teachers plan well to build on students’ previous learning. They relate new objectives to what has been covered before and plan activities to challenge students using tasks with different starting points. In the best lessons, students have good opportunities to develop their independent learning skills. In some weaker lessons, students were all expected to carry out the same task and it was not made clear enough what was expected of different abilities within the class.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Questioning is often used well to set the scene for the main learning based on starting activities that promote discussion and student involvement. For example, in one lesson students reviewed what others had done for their homework and in another they looked at each other’s answers on mini-whiteboards.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 During lessons, short questioning sessions are generally used well to identify any difficulties in understanding. In the best examples, students were given the chance to think about their answers through discussion with a partner before the teacher selected a range of class members to offer answers.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Support staff are well managed and use their expertise to support individual students and groups of students well.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers assess students’ progress regularly, setting them clear targets for their progress by the end of each year and often for each topic. Students report that this gives them good motivation to improve. Homework is used well to complement classwork and provide further assessment opportunities.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Marking of written work has been a recent development focus for staff. Good examples were seen where clear guidance was given on a regular basis on what each student needed to do to improve. However, this detail in marking practice is not yet consistently offered by all staff. Students do not have enough opportunities in class to reflect on and respond to the comments staff have given.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Students’ positive attitudes to all aspects of school life are a strength of the school as a learning community. Behaviour is good throughout the school, both in lessons and at other times of the school day. Students state clearly that they enjoy being at the school.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Students arrive at lessons punctually and ready to learn, with a minimum of time wasted at the start of lessons or when moving between activities. They work at a good pace, present their work well, and make a sustained effort throughout the lesson. They show excellent consideration for their fellow students, listening carefully to others, cooperating well in groups and taking a responsible attitude, for example, when asked to comment on other students’ work.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Teachers set high expectations for behaviour and attitudes in lessons and the students respond very well. There was a high level of trust and respect seen in many classes, with the effective use of humour in many cases demonstrating the maturity of classroom relationships.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Students are very positive about the way the school cares for them. They feel well supported by the excellent relationships in class and feel that the school has a genuine concern to develop them as individuals. This is clearly demonstrated by the work of the mathematics department, where teachers show great skill in developing students’ confidence to tackle challenging tasks.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 The students appreciate the way they are involved in the running of the school and give examples with pride on how they have influenced improvements such as the catering arrangements, school uniform, storage facilities and the development of student social areas. Their views on the school rewards system have helped to develop arrangements that promote good motivation and enjoyment in the school very well.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 There is a good range of opportunities for students to take responsibility in the school including the school council, prefects in different year groups, and taking part in school clubs and sporting activities. Students respond well to these challenges.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Support for students with behaviour difficulties is very well organised, with careful monitoring and individual mentoring ensuring they are given good opportunities to improve. The low rates of exclusion and well-above average attendance demonstrate the effectiveness of the school’s approach.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Parents, staff and students alike feel that the school offers a safe and nurturing environment for students from all backgrounds. Students feel well informed about keeping themselves safe. They are well aware of different types of bullying, including cyber bullying. Students report that bullying is very rare and dealt with effectively.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The headteacher and senior leaders demonstrate a clear commitment to high standards of student achievement and personal development. Recent senior appointments have led to a significant strengthening of the school’s approach to many aspects of school life. The leadership team in their vision and clear thinking show an excellent capacity to improve student achievement still further.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The school has a well documented programme for monitoring, self-evaluation and action planning. Senior leaders, subject leaders and other managers, together with members of the governing body, all play an active part in these processes. The resulting action plans at the departmental level are implemented increasingly effectively because line management meetings are regular and offer a high degree of challenge.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The monitoring of teaching has developed very well in the past year. A comprehensive range of evidence sources is used to evaluate teachers’ performance and identify their individual training needs. Staff feel that the school offers them good opportunities for their professional development. There are effective programmes to monitor and support weaker teachers, so that teaching overall is improving well.  The school system for target setting is very well managed and ensures that high expectations are communicated clearly to all staff and students, as well as to subject leaders. Students’ progress towards their targets is monitored very carefully. The school has excellent arrangements to ensure that appropriate support is offered to those falling behind, both through extra help in lessons and through a comprehensive set of interventions that are regularly reviewed. The new student tracking system that underpins this work represents outstanding

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The wide range of academic and work-related subjects offered meets the needs of students very well and is a strength of the school. The alternative education programme supports more vulnerable students very well. Provision for students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is strong and results in highly positive outcomes for their safety, welfare and confidence. Students are well prepared for the next stages in their education; they feel the guidance they receive on future career and education opportunities is very helpful.

p.7

The leadership and management are good

 There is excellent provision for disabled students and those who have special educational needs. The coordinator ensures that these students progress well by managing a very effective combination of support from specialist staff and training for class teachers.

p.7

The leadership and management are good

 Safeguarding arrangements are well managed and all statutory requirements are met.

p.7

The leadership and management are good

 The governance of the school:  The governing body is very well organised with a range of committees overseeing key areas of the school. Decisions are well informed by valuable first-hand monitoring information from governors’ regular visits to the school.  Governors are experienced and well informed. They have a very good understanding of school performance data so that they offer very good support and challenge to school leaders. They have a detailed awareness of the school’s self-evaluation of strengths and areas for development, monitoring the resulting action plans well.  Governors know about the quality of teaching in the school and receive regular reports on what the school is doing to develop teaching and to tackle any underperformance. They actively oversee the arrangements for teachers’ pay progression.  Expenditure on the pupil premium and Year 7 catch-up for eligible students is monitored

p.7

The leadership and management are good

regularly at meetings and governors know how well these students achieve.  The governing body ensures that external support is funded for the school for review, moderation, and training by the local authority and external consultants.  Governors contribute well to the life of the school, attending parents’ meetings, school performances and awards evenings.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 137926 Local authority Essex Inspection number 428929

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Secondary School category Academy converter Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 1350 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Paul Brazier Headteacher Linda Exley Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Telephone number 01206 842211 Fax number 01206 854756 Email address headteacher@gilberd.com guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion