Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Bell Farm Primary School

Inspected 24 Oct 2013 · published 16 Dec 2013 · URN 125058

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    24 Oct 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Anne Wesley, Gavin Jones, Maura Docherty, Peter Thrussell

  • Leadership and management verified

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Previous overall verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    KT125NB

  • Name on report verified

    Bell Farm Community Primary School

  • URN verified

    125058

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallInadequate
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−4Mixedmore positive than 81% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivepositivevery welloutstandingconsistentlyexcellenthighly effectivevery effective
Criticisminadequatenot alwaysseriousweaknessesdeclininggapsinsufficienttoo often

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1423w−46
  • What needs to improve1488w+37

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,830
about usual (typical 3317)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 46
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 37%What needs to improve 39%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

School report Bell Farm Community Primary School Hersham Road , Hersham, Walton-on-Thames, KT125NB

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Inadequate 4 Achievement of pupils Inadequate 4 Quality of teaching Inadequate 4 Behaviour and safety of pupils Requires improvement 3 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a school that has serious weaknesses.  Pupils make inadequate progress in mathematics. There is a three-year declining trend in attainment in mathematics at the end of Key Stage 2.Up until very recently disabled pupils, those with special educational needs, those for whom the pupil premium provides support and the most able pupils have made inadequate progress.  Historically teachers have not always used the information they have about pupils to ensure work is set at the right level to meet the different needs of all the groups in their classes.  Teachers do not always use teaching assistants well enough to help check and support pupils’ learning.  Pupils’ attitudes to learning require improvement and they do not always tackle written work quickly enough. They are not given sufficient opportunity to respond to teachers’ comments in their books.  Since the previous inspection, leaders and governors have not done enough to improve

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

the quality of teaching and to raise pupils’ achievement, especially in mathematics.  In the past governors did not hold senior leaders to account for falling standards and achievement. They have accepted too readily information given to them about the school’s effectiveness.

p.1

The school has the following strengths

 The new headteacher , supported by the new leadership team, knows what needs to be done to improve the school. Her drive and ambition inspire the current staff.  Staff, pupils and parents are positive about changes that have taken place recently which have resulted in improvements in teaching, learning and pupils’ achievements in the last term and a half.  Governors are now asking challenging questions about pupils’ progress and the quality of teaching.  The new Nursery, Reception and Year 1 classes are very effective in giving these youngest children a flying start.  Pupils are polite and courteous.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 The inspectors visited 21 lessons.  Meetings were held with pupils from the school council, members of the governing body and the senior management team, some middle leaders, the admissions officer and a pastoral officer.  The inspector met with the Chair of the Governing Body. A telephone conversation was held with a representative of the local authority.  Inspectors heard children read and discussed their reading preferences with them, observed morning playtime and lunch breaks and attended an assembly.  Pupils’ work was scrutinised, including the ‘learning journey’ records of the youngest children. Particular note was taken of work in books from the last academic year. Displays around the school were also examined.  Note was taken of the 34 responses to the staff questionnaire and the 67 responses made to the online questionnaire (Parent View).  A range of documents were looked at, including the school’s data on pupils’ progress, lesson

p.2

Information about this inspection

planning, the school’s checks on how well it is doing, monitoring documentation and the headteacher’s log of improvement measures.  Records relating to behaviour, attendance and safeguarding were also examined.  Inspectors met some parents informally at the start the day.

p.2

Inspection team

Anne Wesley, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Maura Docherty Additional Inspector Gavin Jones Additional Inspector Peter Thrussell Additional Inspector

p.2

Full report

In accordance with the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than it might in all the circumstances reasonably expected to perform.

p.3

Information about this school

 The school is a larger-than-average sized primary school. It is currently expanding from a junior school into a primary school.  It has 16 single-age classes, made up of 13 Key Stage 2 classes, two Reception classes and a new Year 1 class. There are no Year 2 classes yet. A Nursery opened this school year.  Most pupils are of White British heritage and there are an increasing number of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds, some of whom speak English as an additional language.  A below average proportion of pupils are eligible for the pupil premium, which in this school provides additional funding for children in local authority care and pupils known to be eligible for free school meals.  The proportion of pupils who are disabled or have special educational needs supported at school action and school action plus is just below average. The proportion of pupils with a statement of special educational needs is just above average.

p.3

Information about this school

 A breakfast club, which is managed by the governing body, is provided.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set out the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.  There have been changes to the school's leadership since the previous inspection. A new headteacher started at the school in April 2013. Other members of the senior leadership team have joined since the time of the previous inspection. This term, seven new teachers began working at the school.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the quality of teaching to good or better so as to raise attainment for all groups of pupils, by:  making sure teachers use information about pupils effectively so that all parts of the lesson, including the introduction, are precisely matched to the needs of all the pupils in the class  ensuring all teachers are flexible enough in their planning to adapt activities to meet learners’ emerging needs within the lesson, so that all are constantly challenged and supported  ensuring teachers deploy teaching assistants well throughout all parts of the lesson  improving pupils’ attitudes to learning and ensuring they tackle written work quickly  ensuring the new marking system is used consistently well to help pupils to improve, especially making sure pupils have opportunities to respond to the teacher’s advice.  Rapidly improve progress in mathematics for all pupils especially those supported by pupil

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

premium by:  making sure the mathematics programmes of work are sufficiently challenging and cover all required areas  ensuring teachers' planning of mathematics lessons moves pupils more quickly beyond basic calculations  providing more opportunities for pupils to apply their number skills in problem-solving activities and to work by themselves to find their own ways to solve problems  ensuring that pupils for whom the school receives pupil premium funding are given effective support to fill any gaps in their basic understanding and so rapidly catch up with their peers.  Improve leadership and management by:  checking the impact of new initiatives to improve the quality of teaching and increase the rates of pupil progress to ensure they are effective  strengthening the way that all senior leaders, especially new middle leaders, work with staff to improve the quality of teaching and learning and lift pupils’ progress and raise standards more

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

quickly  ensuring governors hold the school fully to account for its performance.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is inadequate

 Pupils do not achieve well enough. In 2012, the attainments at the end of Year 6 were well below average in reading, writing and mathematics and the progress these pupils had made through the school was also well below what it should have been.  The 2013 results show no improvement in attainment in mathematics at the end of Year 6, which means that there has been a three-year declining trend. However, there have been improvements in English where attainment is significantly higher than in previous years.  Progress in mathematics is slow throughout Key Stage 2; work is not sufficiently challenging for all pupils and does not cover all the aspects of mathematical understanding. Pupils are not taught well how apply their basic skills. Teachers do not have sufficient understanding to adapt programmes to accelerate pupils’ progress during lessons. As a result, there are too few opportunities for pupils to develop mathematical understanding and independent ways of

p.5

The achievement of pupils is inadequate

working. Pupils seldom use their skills to investigate problems in real-life situations.  The school is not promoting equal opportunities well enough. In 2012, the attainment of pupils in Year 6 known to be eligible for free school meals was nearly a year behind that of their peers in mathematics and over six months behind them in English. Current data show that gaps between the performance of this group of pupils and their peers are not narrowing rapidly enough, because money spent on additional resources is not having enough impact.  There are gaps in the attainment and progress of other groups of pupils. Too many disabled pupils, those with special educational needs and from minority ethnic backgrounds, those who speak English as an additional language and some of the most able learners do not achieve as well as they should as activities are not shaped well enough to meet their individual needs.

p.5

The achievement of pupils is inadequate

However, specific support for pupils with special educational needs currently in Year 4 is having a positive impact on their progress in English. Pupils are now making better progress in Year 3, Year 4 and Year 5 than in previous years. Specific support for pupils with special educational needs in Year 3 and 4 is helping them to catch up in English. In tackling the underachievement in Years 3 and 4, pupils are better equipped when they move into Years 5 and 6.  Since the appointment of the new headteacher, a system for monitoring the progress of groups of pupils has been used rigorously. In a short time, targeted support is having a positive effect and some accelerated progress can be seen. However, there has been too little time to fully counter the effect of a history of underachievement.  Children coming into the Early Years Foundation Stage arrive with skills and abilities that are as expected for their age. Children in the new Reception classes made good progress in the

p.5

The achievement of pupils is inadequate

setting’s first year. The teacher in Year 1 has looked closely at the results of the Reception assessment data and is tailoring activities precisely to the needs of the pupils.

p.5

The quality of teaching is inadequate

 Teaching is inadequate over time and has had insufficient impact on improving pupils’ learning since the previous inspection. There is not enough good or better teaching to ensure that pupils make the rapid progress that is needed to raise standards, particularly in mathematics, across the school.  Teaching has not been tailored sufficiently well to meet the needs of specific groups of pupils. Too many different groups have underachieved, particularly pupils with special educational needs.  Some mathematics teaching was not precisely matched to the needs of all the pupils in the class, in some instances all did the same work and the more able could have moved on to more challenging work more quickly. Furthermore some pupils were presented with work that was too difficult. In most lessons seen, the initiatives started by the new headteacher were evident in improving the quality of teaching; however, these improvements have not yet overcome the

p.5

The quality of teaching is inadequate

adverse effects of inadequate teaching in the past.  Since the start of the school year, marking is now consistently good as can be seen in pupils' current books, in contrast to the weaker marking in their previous books. There are no longer unfinished, unmarked pieces of work in their books. Pupils could explain the system well and said that it helped them ‘to do better next time’. As yet, pupils do not always have sufficient opportunities to respond to the teachers’ advice.  Some stronger teaching was seen during the inspection and, in these lessons, teachers used their knowledge of the pupils’ abilities to move them on quickly. For example, pupils were enthused by their topics and in Year 6 they particularly enjoyed finding out about the Second World War and wrote some good accounts of life in an air-raid shelter However, some pupils lacked the motivation to start writing and produced little, even though they had joined in with

p.5

The quality of teaching is inadequate

the discussions well.  Pupils demonstrate some good knowledge of basic skills in mathematics but are much less confident in applying them to solve problems. However, a new investigative approach was seen when Year 5 pupils were learning to solve one- and two-step problems which will help them to tackle more complicated problems later on.  Although teachers are making better use of assessment information to match tasks to pupils’ level of ability, too often whole-class introductions are too long. They do not challenge the most able and are beyond the understanding of some less able. The result is that pupils are spending too much time on work that is either too easy for some or too hard for others.  Teaching assistants work well with small groups of pupils and when they are supporting individuals. However, they are not deployed consistently well throughout the lesson and too often are uninvolved and passive observers when the teacher is talking to the whole class.

p.6

The quality of teaching is inadequate

 Children in the Early Years classes are offered exciting learning opportunities to which they respond with great enthusiasm. They are curious about the world around them, make good choices about their own learning and persevere well to complete tasks. Children were inspired by the introduction to the theme of ‘Celebrations’ which was related to their own interests and led the planning on how to celebrate Halloween. The learning in this well-resourced setting is preparing the youngest children very well for the next stage in their education.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement

 Pupils’ attitudes to learning require improvement. Where the pace of learning and teaching slows, pupils lose interest and sit quietly. In contrast, where teaching is good, pupils are 'fired up' and clearly enjoy the tasks set for them. However, there is often a reluctance to get started on written tasks, with the result that on occasion, too little written work is produced.  A few parents have concerns that bullying is not dealt with effectively. However, pupils report there is no bullying and they are confident that if there were any issues, they would be dealt with quickly. They have a good understanding about the different kinds of bullying, especially bullying which might occur through the use of the internet and social networking sites.  Pupils say there is no racism in the school. They were keen to explain that ‘everyone gets on with everyone’. Playtime is a pleasant social occasion enjoyed by the pupils, who play well

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils requires improvement

together. Pupils are polite and courteous to each other and to adults. They behave well around the school, readily engage in conversation with visitors and display excellent manners.  A revised policy to manage behaviour has been established by the new headteacher and is being used consistently well throughout the school. Pupils like the ‘Class behaviour ladders’ and say, ‘They are fair and help everyone to behave well’ and ‘It wasn’t so good before the ladders’.  Detailed records of incidents and any misbehaviour show that prompt and decisive action is taken to address them. As a result pupils, feel safe and well cared for.  The youngest children quickly learn the rules of good behaviour, settle well into school routines and form good relations with adults and other children.  Attendance is improving and is now average. The school has worked hard to improve punctuality and now fewer pupils are late for school.

p.6

The leadership and management require improvement

 Leadership and management require improvement because over time, leaders have not been able to address the decline in pupils’ achievement, especially in mathematics. However, the new headteacher and leadership team have taken action which is leading to significant improvement in the quality of teaching and pupils’ achievement.  A new team of middle leaders has been established, with clear roles and responsibilities, and this is having an impact on raising achievement but there has been insufficient time for their actions to have improved standards significantly in their areas.  Self-evaluation is now accurate and the school improvement plan identifies the right priorities to improve teaching and accelerate the progress of all groups of pupils.  Over time, the school’s procedures for checking the quality of its work have been insufficiently rigorous. However, the headteacher has introduced a clear system to help teachers track the

p.7

The leadership and management require improvement

progress of individual pupils. This is being used effectively, so that individual pupils’ progress in reading, writing and mathematics is checked regularly and reported on to governors.  A new performance management scheme provides support, challenge and appropriate training for staff. Actions to bring about improvement are always followed through to see if they are successful. Teachers are being made accountable for the progress of pupils in their classes.  Topics studied bring together different subjects in a way that some pupils describe as ‘fun and interesting’; they appreciate the visits and visitors which enrich the themes considered. The wider curriculum contributes well to the pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development.  Additional funding to increase sporting opportunities has been used to enhance the quality and breadth of physical education and sport provision. Professional coaches are used to teach pupils

p.7

The leadership and management require improvement

skills in a diverse range of sports. Teachers’ skills in teaching physical education are developing as they work in lessons with coaches.  The local authority has supported the new headteacher and further support is planned. A recent review of leadership recognises that improvements have been made, particularly in the quality of teaching. The headteacher has welcomed the support and although improvement is in the early stages, she is determined to ensure that the quality of teaching will continue to improve.  Parents are generally supportive of the school’s work and are particularly pleased that the recent years of instability in the school’s leadership has ended. They are positive about the new early years setting and Key Stage 1, typically saying, ‘My son loves it, there are so many opportunities there for him, he is learning so fast!’  The governance of the school:  In the past, governors did not hold senior leaders to account for falling standards and

p.7

The leadership and management require improvement

achievement, accepting too readily information given to them about the school’s effectiveness. Governors say that they now are more fully informed and so in a better position to question the school on its effectiveness. They now have a better understanding of the need for rapid improvements and are working with the new headteacher on a strategic improvement plan as suggested in a recent Leadership Review. They are informed about the new systems which have been introduced and are closely monitoring the impact of initiatives. They scrutinise assessment data to check on pupils’ progress against that of all pupils nationally and hold teachers to account for the progress of their pupils. They ensure performance management links pay with good teaching and play an effective role in making staff appointments and promoting staff within the school. Governors are now checking to ensure that pupils in receipt

p.7

The leadership and management require improvement

of the pupil premium receive the support they need to help them to achieve as well as other pupils. They are asking challenging questions and are supportive as they share the ambitions of the headteacher for the school to become much more effective. Governors regularly take part in training to ensure they are fully up to date. They ensure that all their statutory obligations are fully met, including those for safeguarding.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 125058 Local authority Surrey Inspection number 428944

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 500 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Pip Ashton Headteacher Anne Cooper Date of previous school inspection 23–24 November 2011 Telephone number 01932 224009 Fax number 01932 224009 Email address head@bell-farm.surrey.sch.uk guidance ‘Raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion