Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Susan Gregory
- Postcode verified
NG4 4JD
- URN verified
EY407637
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Through documentation used at the setting and through discussion and observation at the monitoring visit the inspector concludes that the provider has made insufficient progress in meeting the issues raised at inspection. p.2
- A named deputy and Special Educational Needs Coordinator are now in place. p.2
- Some training has already been completed and further training is planned which will help to develop the staffs knowledge and understanding around supporting children with special educational needs or disabilities. p.2
- Although registers are in place these do not consistently record children who attend the out of school provision. p.2
- Staff need to ensure they monitor records to ensure children’s times of attendance are accurately recorded. p.2
- Staffs knowledge and understanding of planning, observation and assessment is poor. p.2
- Planning is completed at the beginning of each day and does not take into account children’s choices or promote any areas of development for individual children. p.2
- Limited observation are undertaken on children, instead staff are over reliant on their knowledge of the child to assess the progress they are making. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 1,049
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 26 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Store Street Manchester M1 2WD Telephone: 0300 123 1231 Fax: 0300 123 3159 Minicom: 0161 618 8524 Email: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk Web: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Jesters Childcare Ltd Stanhope Primary School, Keyworth Road Gedling NOTTINGHAM NG4 4JD Our Reference EY407637
p.1
Outcome of monitoring visit for provision judged as inadequate
An Ofsted inspector, Diane Stone, carried out a monitoring visit of your provision on 23/09/2013. This visit follows on from your inspection where the provision was judged to be inadequate.
p.1
Outcome of the visit
As a result of our inspection on 25/07/2013, we sent you a welfare requirements notice.
p.1
Outcome of the visit
The notices required you to: ensure a daily record of the names of the children being cared for on the premises and their hours of attendance is maintained.
p.1
Outcome of the visit
You were also issued with a notice of actions to improve that required you to: observe and assess each child's starting points across all areas of learning and development in relation to their age and stage of development and use this information to accurately identify their needs and plan for the next steps in their learning; ensure that at least half of the staff team hold at least a full and relevant level 2 qualification; ensure there is a named Special Educational Needs Co-ordinator in the setting; keep a daily record of the names of the children looked after on the premises and their hours of attendance (compulsory part of the Childcare Register); keep a daily record of the names of the children looked after on the premises and their hours of attendance (voluntary part of the Childcare Register); ensure there is a named deputy who, is capable and qualified to take charge in the manager's absence.
p.1
Outcome of the visit
From evidence gathered at the visit on the 23 September 2013 the inspector concluded that the welfare requirement notice had been met. Although some progress had been made in meeting the notice of actions to improve, insufficient progress had been made in all areas, particular with regard to learning and development requirements. Having considered all the evidence, the inspector is of the opinion that at this time the setting is making inadequate improvement overall.
p.1
Outcome of the visit
To comply with the requirements of the EYFS the registered person must take the following action by the specified date:
p.2
Outcome of the visit
keep a daily record of the names of the children looked after on the premises and their hours of attendance (compulsory part of the Childcare Register). 26/07/2013 keep a daily record of the names of the children looked after on the premises and their hours of attendance (voluntary part of the Childcare Register). 26/07/2013 observe and assess each child's starting points across all areas of learning and development in relation to their age and stage of development and use this information to accurately identify their needs and plan for the next steps in their learning 02/09/2013
p.2
Overall effectiveness of the improvement and outcomes for children
Through documentation used at the setting and through discussion and observation at the monitoring visit the inspector concludes that the provider has made insufficient progress in meeting the issues raised at inspection.
p.2
Overall effectiveness of the improvement and outcomes for children
A named deputy and Special Educational Needs Coordinator are now in place. Some training has already been completed and further training is planned which will help to develop the staffs knowledge and understanding around supporting children with special educational needs or disabilities.
p.2
Overall effectiveness of the improvement and outcomes for children
Although registers are in place these do not consistently record children who attend the out of school provision. Staff need to ensure they monitor records to ensure children’s times of attendance are accurately recorded.
p.2
Overall effectiveness of the improvement and outcomes for children
Staffs knowledge and understanding of planning, observation and assessment is poor. Planning is completed at the beginning of each day and does not take into account children’s choices or promote any areas of development for individual children. Limited observation are undertaken on children, instead staff are over reliant on their knowledge of the child to assess the progress they are making. Only one or two observations of children’s development is recorded in each area of learning despite children attending for several months and overall numbers of children being low. This means staff have insufficient observations for them to accurately determined children’s progress, next steps or if they are achieving at expected levels. The manager and staff admit they are unclear on how to observe children and if they are appropriately assessing children progress within the Early Years Foundation Stage. In order to ensure good outcomes for children staff need to
p.2
Overall effectiveness of the improvement and outcomes for children
undertake more observations of children, consider each child's stage of development so any assessment is based on knowledge of what individual child can do. In addition, planning needs to include any next steps that staff have identified from their assessment of children progress.
p.2
Overall effectiveness of the improvement and outcomes for children
Although progress has been made in meeting some of the requirement raised at inspection, there is still work to be done to ensure that all the notices of action to improve are met. The next visit will be a further monitoring visit at which we expect to see improvement. The provider needs to demonstrate that improvement can be made to ensure effective planning, observation and assessment of children’s learning which takes into account children individual learning styles is in place and to ensure records of attendance are consistently maintained.
p.3
Next steps
Having considered all the evidence the inspector is of the opinion that at this time:
p.3
Next steps
The setting has made inadequate progress in addressing the points for improvement. The next visit will be a further monitoring visit.
p.3
Next steps
If you have any further queries please contact us on the number at the top of this letter.
p.3
Next steps
Susan Gregory HMI National Director, Inspection Delivery Our Reference EY407637
p.3
Next steps
EYL413 EY407637 For the attention of: Compliance, Investigation and Enforcement Team.
p.4
Reply slip
Jesters Childcare Ltd Stanhope Primary School, Keyworth Road Gedling NOTTINGHAM NG4 4JD
p.4
ACTIONS
Please complete the box below to show what you have done in order to meet the action required:
p.4
Action Required Action Taken Date Completed
keep a daily record of the names of the children looked after on the premises and their hours of attendance (compulsory part of the Childcare Register). keep a daily record of the names of the children looked after on the premises and their hours of attendance (voluntary part of the Childcare Register). observe and assess each child's starting points across all areas of learning and development in relation to their age and stage of development and Our Reference EY407637
p.4
Action Required Action Taken Date Completed
EYL413 EY407637 use this information to accurately identify their needs and plan for the next steps in their learning
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion