Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
John Peckham
- Postcode verified
PE11 3DG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 844
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 24 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Anita Bandey Deeping St Nicholas Primary School Main Road Deeping St Nicholas PE11 3DG
p.1
Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 3 December 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report my findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement in October 2013 it was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Primary School
Despite the relatively short period since the recent section 5 inspection, senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified. The school should take further action to:
p.1
Primary School
produce a plan for exactly when a range of different quality assurance monitoring activities will take place, who will conduct them and how the results will be evaluated - ensure that the feedback to teachers from this activity is accurately diagnostic, identifying exactly which areas of practice are strengths and which require improvement - link each area of improvement to specific, short-term professional development activities that will help bring about rapid improvement and sharing of best practice - bring forward issues identified at previous monitoring activity to ensure that improvements are being made and consolidated
p.1
Primary School
ensure that actions implemented as part of the school improvement plan, such as the ‘good to be green’ behaviour system and the new Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9166 Direct email : helen.johnson@serco.com marking policy, are quickly and professionally evaluated so that their impact becomes clear and modifications, if required, can be made
p.1
Primary School
use the opportunities created as part of the collaborative partnership to build the skills and capacity of leaders across the school so that all become more skilled in evaluating and improving the work of others
p.2
Primary School
develop some more visual ways to communicate attendance and attainment information to pupils, parents and governors so that this has a greater impact on motivation and understanding
p.2
Evidence
During my visit, I met with you, the Governing Body, a group of pupils and I spoke on the telephone with a representative of the local authority, to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated the school improvement plan and the school’s systems for monitoring the progress of pupils and the quality of teaching. I also toured the school with you and visited all the classes while they were at work.
p.2
Main findings
This monitoring visit took place only four weeks after the section 5 inspection. Despite this short period, leaders and governors have already brought about some noticeable changes. A new system to help improve motivation and behaviour was introduced as a pilot in the Year 4, 5 & 6 class shortly before the inspection. Called ‘good to be green’ the pupils said that this had already had an impact in improving behaviour. Teachers have also begun work on improving the ways in which pupils respond to their marked work. There was evidence in pupils’ books of this having started and of pupils making corrections or adding to their work to complete it or consolidate their learning. Parents have been engaged in seeking to improve rates of attendance. All have received a letter and statistics showing the attendance of each year group were sent home after three weeks. Additional time has been purchased from the educational welfare officer to tackle some persistent absence.
p.2
Main findings
The governing body has looked hard at its own way of working, following discussions with the local leader of education who worked with the school for a period. Further training for governors has been arranged to help them gain better skills in monitoring the work of the school. Leaders have rewritten the school development plan to include the additional areas for improvement identified at the inspection.
p.2
Main findings
The school development plan includes all the key elements and includes ambitious targets. Leaders and governors are very much aware of the need for urgent improvement. The school’s systems for checking on the progress of pupils are good enough. Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The school has drawn upon three sources of additional support. A local leader of education from a Grantham school worked with the headteacher and governing body for a period last year. The school is an active member of a rural schools partnership with five other local schools. The local authority has been able to offer additional support including providing some additional training for the governing body and supporting the headteacher in checking the quality of teaching. Good use has been made of all of these.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Lincolnshire County Council.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion