Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Huntington School

Inspected 7 Nov 2013 · published 28 Nov 2013 · URN 121673

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    7 Nov 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Clive Hurren, David Thompson, John Paddick, Linda Magrath, Peter William Harrison

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    YO32 9WT

  • Name on report verified

    Huntington School

  • URN verified

    121673

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+64Positivemore positive than 37% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingeffectivevery effectivegood progressexcellenteffectivelyvery wellstrong
Criticismrequires improvementinadequatepersistent absencegapsseriousweaknessesbelowinsufficient

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1751w+69
  • Leadership708w+51
  • What needs to improve91w+74

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,468
about usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 48
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 54%Leadership 22%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 22%

Full report text

Huntington School Huntington Road, Huntington, York, North Yorkshire, YO32 9WT

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Students make good progress in a wide range of subjects and achieve well.  There is a good atmosphere for learning throughout the school.  Above average GCSE results reflect the good progress that students make in Years 10 and 11.  The sixth form is good and A-level results compare very favourably with national averages.  When younger students have not made expected progress in reading the school provides very effective teaching to enable them to catch up.  Teaching is either good or outstanding in many lessons.  Good teaching is lifting attainment in Years 10 and 11 to well-above average levels.  Students enjoy school, behave well and display good attitudes to learning. They say that there is very little bullying and that if it does occur members of staff deal with it effectively.  Students’ attendance is above average and persistent absence below average.  The school provides a very safe setting for

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

students’ education.  The headteacher promotes an ethos of strong professional challenge and high expectations among staff, governors and students.  Good leadership and management at all levels, including the governing body, are effective in ensuring that in this improving school the quality of teaching and students’ achievement are constantly rising.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 Although teaching is good overall, there is insufficient outstanding classroom practice to lift students’ progress to the highest levels.  In the few lessons where teaching requires improvement, the pace of learning is too slow.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed 39 lessons, including four joint observations with the headteacher and his senior team.  They looked carefully at a wide range of students’ written work, especially in Years 9 and 11.  They held meetings with the headteacher, representatives of the governing body, members of staff, groups of students and a representative of the local authority.  Inspectors looked at many documents including governing body minutes, school evaluation, development planning, records of students’ attainment and progress, a local authority monitoring report and safeguarding procedures.  They took account of 98 responses to the staff questionnaire and 175 responses to the on-line (Parent View) questionnaire.

p.2

Inspection team

John Paddick, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Linda Magrath Additional Inspector Clive Hurren Additional Inspector David Thompson Additional Inspector Peter William Harrison Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 Huntington School is a larger than average size secondary school and has a large sixth form.  Almost all students are White British.  Proportions of students supported through school action, school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs are all below average.  The proportion of students known to be eligible for pupil premium is below average. (The pupil premium is additional funding for students who are known to be eligible for free school meals, children from service families and those looked after by the local authority.)  The school does not enter students for GCSE before Year 11.  A very small number of sixth-form students attend courses at Joseph Rowntree School.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards which set the minimum expectations for students’ attainment and progress.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the overall quality of teaching from good to outstanding by:  substantially increasing the proportion of outstanding teaching and reducing to zero that which requires improvement  using the current outstanding practice as a model for staff to follow  increasing pace, challenge and student engagement in a minority of lessons  ensuring that teaching fully caters for students of all abilities  using some of the teaching assistants more effectively in lessons  ensuring that all written work is marked well and that advice given is followed up.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Students make good progress and achieve well in a wide range of GCSE, AS and A-level courses. They join Year 7 with above average attainment in English and mathematics and proceed to gain GCSE results that are in many respects consistently above the national average. Most students embarking upon AS and A-level courses in the sixth form complete them and gain qualifications that reflect the good progress they have made.  GCSE results in 2013 rose substantially compared with 2012. Three quarters of students gained five results in the range A*-C including English and mathematics. This was largely because results in mathematics improved substantially in response to effective intervention work by managers at all levels. Achievement in English and mathematics was good.  In 2012, some students who joined the school in Year 7 with average and below average attainment in mathematics had underachieved at GCSE in this key subject. The school took

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

effective action in the following twelve months and ensured that in 2013, all students, whatever their level of ability, achieved at least in line with expectations in mathematics and many did better than that.  The overall good GCSE results of 2012 revealed that the group of students known to be eligible for free school meals did not do as well as other students. 2013 saw the gap closing rapidly in response to the extra support that the school provided.  At AS and A-level in 2013, proportions of students completing their courses were above average and results in the ranges A* to B and A* to E compared very favourably with national averages. The school’s A-level results show a consistent picture over several years and represent good achievement.  The school’s excellent tracking system shows that students of all abilities are currently making at least good progress and many are doing better than that. This includes more-able students,

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

disabled students and those with special educational needs and the very small number of sixth- form students who attend Joseph Rowntree School to study A-level further mathematics and photography. This good progress is confirmed by inspectors’ scrutiny of students’ work, interviews with them and visits to lessons. The school sets challenging targets for its students and monitors their progress in a robust and effective manner. Good promotion of equal opportunity is reflected in the way that slippage by any individual student or groups triggers effective interventions to enable them to overcome barriers to progress and catch up.  The school uses its pupil premium funding well in ensuring that gaps between the performance of students known to be eligible for free school meals and other students are closing quickly. For example, the gap at GCSE has reduced substantially between 2012 and 2013 and is predicted by

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

the accurate tracking system to fall further. For example, in 2012 the average GCSE grade for all students was B but for students known to be eligible for pupil premium it was D. The 2013 results showed that the school had successfully reduced the difference to around half a grade. Younger students qualifying for extra support through catch-up funding receive very effective extra help with reading and make very good progress.  In the large majority of lessons observed by inspectors, students of all abilities were found to be making at least good progress in a very wide range of subjects. Where teaching was outstanding, progress for all students was very rapid. Students generally take a pride in their work and present it well. They express themselves well both orally and in writing. Now that standards in mathematics have risen substantially, students can use numerical and algebraic skills confidently in a range of contexts, particularly in calculations and equations relating to

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 The quality of teaching is improving substantially and rapidly in response to effective management initiatives and staff training. It is good in all year groups including the sixth form. The effect of this good and improving teaching is evident in the rising academic standards, especially in Years 10 and 11, the good quality of students’ written work that inspectors scrutinised during the inspection and the good quality learning that they observed in the majority of lessons.  Teachers demonstrate fully the qualities outlined in the National Teaching Standards.  Good class management and good relationships with students are features which characterise teaching throughout the school. Relationships between teachers and students are universally good.  Where teaching is good or better, teachers plan their lessons well, maintain a good pace and really interest and inspire their students. Good questioning challenges students and frequently

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

enables them to think out answers for themselves and take some responsibility for their own learning. The activities that teachers plan in these lessons enable students to maximise the time available in gaining new knowledge, skills and understanding.  Where teaching is outstanding, teachers generate a superb atmosphere for learning so students demonstrate a thirst for knowledge and improvement and make rapid progress. Examples of this high quality teaching were observed during the inspection in lessons in English in Years 8 and 10, French in Year 13, geography in Year 8, food technology in Year 11 and resistant materials in Year 7.  In the few lessons where teaching requires improvement, the pace of learning is much slower than in the majority of lessons. These lessons lack the drive, challenge, excitement and compelling explanations and activities that are evident in the better lessons. This is sometimes

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

because teachers spend too long with explanations and do not fully engage the interest of all their students. Sometimes they do not cater fully for students of all abilities so for some, progress is relatively slow.  There is variability in the quality of deployment of teaching assistants in lessons. Frequently they are well-informed and target their help effectively but there are instances of their roles and targets not being effectively incorporated into the planning and teaching of lessons.  The marking of students’ work is generally good. There are many examples of outstanding practice where teachers really make every effort to ensure that students learn from their mistakes. Marking usually identifies ways in which students can improve their work but teachers do not always ensure that their advice and instructions have been followed. For example, unfinished or incomplete work is frequently identified through marking but not followed up later.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Students in all year groups display positive attitudes to learning. They are generally keen to learn and co-operate well with their teachers and classroom assistants. Students’ behaviour at breaks, lunchtimes and when moving between classrooms is mature and sensible. Evidence strongly suggests that the good behaviour observed during the inspection is typical of the day- to-day operation of the school.  Student perceptions gained through interviews with inspectors, the on-line parental survey and the staff questionnaire all confirm that all stakeholders are confident that behaviour in the school is good.  Attendance is above average and persistent absence below average because the school has robust systems to ensure that students attend regularly.  Excellent care, guidance and support for students of all ages ensure that they are all treated as individuals and their needs met. This is especially true for younger students who need extra help

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

with their reading and writing and for disabled students and those with special educational needs. The effectiveness of the support programme is reflected in some really moving examples of students who start from a very low attainment base in Year 7 and proceed to gain excellent GCSE results. Parents speak highly of the levels of care, guidance and support that are available for their children, for example on transfer from primary school.  Students say that they feel perfectly safe in school and recognise the lengths that teachers and their assistants will go to in order to overcome periods of unhappiness or barriers to progress. They fully understand how to keep safe and confirm that they have learnt about a wide range of potential risks to their safety and welfare, for example, different types of bullying, smoking and alcohol. Students confirm that racist incidents and bullying are rare and that when they do occur

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

they have every confidence that members of staff would deal with them effectively. The school’s detailed records of these incidents confirm that they are indeed relatively rare and that effective action is taken as and when it is necessary  There is a small minority of students who sometimes find it difficult to conduct themselves consistently in line with the school’s high expectations. On the occasions that they need to be removed from class to ensure that other pupils can learn effectively, they are transferred to a base where they can work under very close supervision. This system is very effective.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Huntington School is successful and effective because the headteacher and his senior team lead and manage it very well. Middle and junior managers support them effectively to ensure that intended changes and improvements materialise quickly.  The headteacher provides a rigorous approach to school improvement, particularly in his leadership of teaching and learning. The whole team of managers has a relentless and effective focus on the quality of teaching and good student achievement. It is obvious that the whole team works very well together because teaching and attainment are improving quickly. The staff questionnaire shows that morale is good and that members of staff support the constant push for further improvement.  The school has very effective methods for checking on how well it is doing, so managers know where there are strong features and areas which still need to be improved. There is no room for

p.6

The leadership and management are good

complacency here. When improvements are deemed necessary, high profile action-plans chart the actions to be taken, success criteria, timescales and methods of monitoring and evaluation. Currently, the main focus is on the quality of teaching in order to move the standard of education that the school provides from good to outstanding.  Management of teaching is effective in improving classroom practice. Senior managers monitor teaching accurately and provide teachers with appropriate areas for improvement. Performance management arrangements are robust and effective, and the proportion of teaching requiring improvement is reducing quickly. However, there is still scope to make greater use of the school’s outstanding classroom practice as a model for teachers to follow.  Leaders have designed a very good curriculum which enables students to choose from a wide range of GCSE and AS and A-level courses, while there are many extra-curricular activities

p.6

The leadership and management are good

designed to widen their horizons and increase confidence. Equal opportunity has a high profile which ensures that the needs of all students are met. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is promoted strongly. Careers education and good quality information about courses available within school and with other providers ensure that students can make the right choices about next stages in their education or the world of work.  Safeguarding meets all requirements. Arrangements for checking on the identities of all adults who have access to students are exemplary.  The governance of the school:  Governors have a very clear understanding about the school’s strong features and are well- informed about what still needs to be improved. They ensure that managers are challenged in a professional manner and ensure that performance management arrangements are effective.  They have a clear understanding of how well students of all ages and abilities are doing in

p.6

The leadership and management are good

relation to national expectations and averages.  Governors have an accurate view of the quality of teaching because of the detailed information they receive from the headteacher. They ensure that salary progressions are carefully monitored.  They know how the school uses its pupil premium funding and Year 7 catch-up funding, and understand the impact it has had in closing performance gaps and raising attainment.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 121673 Local authority York Inspection number 429579

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Secondary School category Community Age range of pupils 11–18 Gender of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils in the sixth form Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 1462 Of which, number on roll in sixth form 309 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair May Kaye Headteacher John Tomsett Date of previous school inspection 4 June 2009 Telephone number 01904 752100 Fax number 01904 752101 Email address j.tomsett@huntington-ed.org.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion