Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
John Daniell
- Postcode verified
EN9 3PX
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 861
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 25 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Jackie Blackburn Headteacher Upshire Primary Foundation School Upshire Road Upshire EN9 3PX
p.1
Foundation School
Following my visit to your school on 27 November 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Foundation School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in July 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Foundation School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
Foundation School
ensure that the action plan identifies opportunities to measure the impact of actions wherever possible so that leaders and managers know whether the school is on track to become a good school within the time frame. Identify members of the governing body who are to monitor the delivery of the plan set yourself more challenging targets for the quality of good and better teaching for the end of the academic year.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I held meetings with you and the deputy headteacher, eight pupils from Key Stage 2, five members of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated your Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9154 Direct email : aidan.dunne@serco.com
p.1
PROTECT-INSPECTION
school action plan. I also visited every classroom with you to look at the quality of teaching and to talk to pupils about their work.
p.2
Context
Since the previous inspection, you have changed the structure of the senior leadership team by removing one senior teacher from the structure. However, you have strengthened leadership by appointing two middle leaders who are responsible for a range of subject areas.
p.2
Main findings
On our visits to lessons, we saw most pupils engaged in their learning and many working at a level which was appropriate for their capabilities. Pupils told me they find teachers’ feedback helpful in moving up to the next level of attainment. Staff training is appropriately targeted, and aims to tackle any existing barriers which prevent the school from being ‘good’. You have introduced a number of new initiatives which I saw teachers use to make sure work is better suited to pupils’ capabilities, including for higher attaining pupils. Teachers are implementing very recently introduced amendments to the marking policy, but it is too early to measure for any impact.
p.2
Main findings
The governing body demonstrates a very good awareness of issues the school needs to tackle. Minutes of meetings show that they are asking you challenging questions.
p.2
Main findings
Your concise school action plan makes sufficient reference to the two main areas for improvement identified at the time of the last inspection. You have identified key times during the year when you plan to check on progress against the plan. However, there is not always enough detail to identify how you plan to measure for success, and the plan does identify who is to monitor the areas for development. Your target for the proportion of teaching judged as good and better by the end of the academic year is not high enough for teaching to be judged as consistently good.
p.2
Main findings
The current group of pupils in Year 6 is larger than that of the previous year, and presents different challenges. Your information for this group of pupils indicates a drop in standards for 2014. While this may not necessarily be due to underachievement, it is nevertheless essential to analyse in depth the reasons behind this, and to challenge yourselves and your pupils to make the greatest possible gains in their learning.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The local authority is providing ‘light touch’ support through its half-termly meetings, all of which are focused on key aspects of school improvement. Some of your teachers have attended training provided by the local authority to improve their practice in the classroom, and the whole teaching staff benefitted from a training session in improving the teaching of mathematics provided by the Waltham Abbey Consortium.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Essex.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
The letter should be copied to the following:
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body/Interim Executive Board Local authority – including where the school is an academy Contractor providing support services on behalf of the local authority - where appropriate The Education Funding Agency (EFA) if the school has a sixth form Diocese – for voluntary aided and voluntary controlled schools The person or body responsible for appointing foundation governors if the school has a foundation DfE - Academies Advisers Unit [ colin.diamond@education.gsi.gov.uk ] – for academies
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion