Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Allan Torr
- Postcode verified
WN8 9TG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- It should also include precise ways of measuring the successful actions taken throughout the year and have a greater focus on the weaknesses identified in the school’s data. p.2
- The school should take further additional action to: p.1
- The capacity of the school to improve itself needs to be developed quickly because senior leaders are heavily reliant on external support. p.2
- To improve further, the headteacher should consider weekly senior leadership meetings to build the school’s capacity to improve itself. p.2
- Senior leaders have identified improvement in pupils’ understanding of what they need to do to improve their work. p.2
- The letter should be copied to the following: p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 1,275
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 6
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566 857 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: jkinsman@cfbt.com
p.1
Mrs Anne O'Brien Headteacher St Joseph's Roman Catholic Primary School, Darwen Limes Avenue Darwen Lancashire BB3 2SG
p.1
Catholic Primary School, Darwen, Blackburn with Darwen
Following my visit to your school on 21 November 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection. The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in September 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Catholic Primary School, Darwen, Blackburn with Darwen
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further additional action to:
p.1
Catholic Primary School, Darwen, Blackburn with Darwen
Increase pupils’ achievement in writing and mathematics particularly in Reception and Years 1 and 2. Increase boys’ attainment across the school so that the gap between boys and girls closes. Increase the capacity of governors and senior leaders to improve aspects of the school themselves without external support. Improve the school’s action plan so that it makes very clear how improvements will be measured throughout the year and is easy to follow and evaluate.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I met with you and senior leaders. I also met with four representatives from the governing body, the local authority’s adviser and the National Leader in Education who is supporting you and your school leaders. I evaluated the school’s improvement plan and briefly looked through some records of lesson observations completed by senior leaders.
p.1
Main findings
The main reason why the school has made effective improvement since the inspection is because it has been well supported by the local authority, a National Leader of Governance, two advanced-skills teachers and a National Leader in Education from a local school. Although senior leaders have taken effective action against the points for improvement identified in the previous inspection it has not made much progress on its route to be judged as good at the next inspection.
p.2
Main findings
The governing body spent a day with a National Leader of Governance (NLG) who produced a highly critical report on the governance of the school. The criticisms have galvanised governors to act quickly to begin a reconstitution and restructure resulting in an amalgamation of committees and new roles and responsibilities. Governors are due to complete a skills audit, and identify their training needs. Although none of these have taken place yet, they are due to be completed by Christmas. In addition, the local authority is adding expertise to the governing body by appointing two new governors. At the time of my visit, the governors did not yet have access to Raiseonline which is Ofsted’s collection of data about the school. It is imperative that governors have this document as soon as possible so that they are able to compare pupils’ achievement with national averages and identify trends of improvement or decline. The committees and the full governing body are
p.2
Main findings
highly reliant on external advice and support. Rapid improvement is needed if they are to be self-sufficient and fulfil their role effectively in challenging the school to improve to ‘good’.
p.2
Main findings
With help from the National Leader in Education, senior leaders have streamlined paperwork and documentation and have introduced improved systems to check on teachers’ work. Senior leaders now monitor lessons and pupils’ work more frequently. They give clear feedback to teachers about what they have seen and most importantly, they follow this through to check that improvements have quickly been made.
p.2
Main findings
The capacity of the school to improve itself needs to be developed quickly because senior leaders are heavily reliant on external support. The local authority and National Leaders have helped the headteacher to write an action plan for improvement. The plan needs to be refined and improved further so that it is shorter and has clear priorities for improvement. It should also include precise ways of measuring the successful actions taken throughout the year and have a greater focus on the weaknesses identified in the school’s data. These weaknesses include: pupils’ writing, boys’ attainment, standards in Key Stage 1, children’s achievement in Reception and pupils’ attainment in mathematics. Management team meetings involve almost every teacher in the school and are scheduled for every two or three weeks. To improve further, the headteacher should consider weekly senior leadership meetings to build the school’s capacity to improve itself.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders, with help from advanced skills teachers and the National Leader in Education, have improved some aspects of teaching. There is a new marking policy in place and senior leaders confirmed teachers now enable pupils to respond to their marking and comments. Sometimes this means pupils correct aspects of their work such as spellings and grammar and sometimes it means they complete a challenge or answer a teacher’s comment. Senior leaders have identified improvement in pupils’ understanding of what they need to do to improve their work. The teacher responsible for leading English in the school identified some positive gains in pupils’ writing. In Reception for example, the old system of concentrating on communication for a term, reading for a term and then writing for a term has been replaced to make sure children learn all three aspects of English at the same time. As a result Reception children’s skills, according to senior leaders, are improving.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
As described above, much of the improvements to the school since the inspection have been inspired and secured by external support.
p.3
External support
Senior leaders identified some improvements to teaching as a result of work with two advanced-skills teachers, for example, instead of dividing every lesson into three distinct parts, teachers are now more flexible and let some higher-ability pupils start work quickly and other pupils stay with the teacher until they fully understand before starting their work. Teachers now plan lessons, according to senior leaders, that are based on the needs of pupils rather than rigidly following a scheme of work. The advanced-skills teachers work at the school led by the National Leader of Education (NLE). The NLE started work with the school approximately a year ago and volunteered to continue working with it. As a result there is a continuity and clarity of message and school’s systems, for example tracking pupils’ progress, have continued to improve.
p.3
External support
In addition to brokering the time from the NLE and the NLG, the local authority has continued to make visits to the school to provide challenge and support to senior leaders. This support has been diluted because of the school’s lack of capacity to improve itself. Nevertheless, the school, with support from external partners, has made effective improvement on the recommendations made in the Ofsted report.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Blackburn with Darwen and as below.
p.3
Her Majesty's Inspector
The letter should be copied to the following:
p.3
Her Majesty's Inspector
Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body Local authority - Contractor providing support services on behalf of the local authority - where appropriate < Diocese - for voluntary aided and voluntary controlled schools The person or body responsible for appointing foundation governors if the school has a foundation
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion