Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 11 Dec 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Michelle Parker

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Michelle Parker

  • Postcode verified

    B68 8NE

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+4Mixedmore positive than 26% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedimprovingclearly
Criticismat riskmissed

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings525w−10
  • What needs to improve250w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
773
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%What needs to improve 32%

Full report text

John Martin Oldbury Academy Pound Road B68 8NE

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Oldbury Academy

Following my visit to your academy on 19 November 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the academy since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Oldbury Academy

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in September 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Oldbury Academy

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The academy should take further action to:

p.1

Requires improvement: monitoring inspection visit to Oldbury Academy

 ensure that students take greater responsibility for correct spelling, punctuation and grammar in their written work.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you and other senior leaders and the Governing Body to discuss the action taken since the previous inspection. The academy improvement plans and the minutes of the governing body were evaluated. Brief observations were made with the headteacher of part of eight lessons. Students’ exercise books were scrutinised. The impact of the academy’s monitoring activities was evaluated.

p.1

Context

There are no significant changes in context since the previous inspection. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 6799169 Direct email : mathew.mitchell@serco.com

p.1

Main findings

Since the previous inspection, you have acted with determination to address the development issues highlighted in the report. These are included in your updated academy improvement plans. You have tightened up your monitoring procedures and revisited earlier work on developing literacy across the academy. This is promoting students’ reading. All teachers have information on students’ reading levels that they use well to plan work.

p.2

Main findings

You have developed the work of your Teaching and Learning Group to increase its ability to share good practice and to move all teaching to good. The Teaching and Learning Group has introduced new non-negotiables to inform teachers’ planning, the start of lessons and to improve the pace and challenge of learning. The marking of work and quality of written feedback to students have improved. Appropriately, all staff are expected to mark spelling, punctuation and grammar. Opportunities are missed to encourage students to take responsibility for checking the accuracy of their spelling, punctuation and grammar. It is too early to see the impact of these strategies. All teachers have written checklists to help students to improve their study skills. Year 11 students at risk of under achievement have a senior member of staff to mentor and support them as do students targeted for B and higher grades at GCSE. Procedures to monitor progress and attendance in the sixth form have been

p.2

Main findings

tightened up. As a result, attendance in the sixth form is improving.

p.2

Main findings

A new tracking system is used to monitor the progress of different groups of students including higher attaining ones and those eligible to receive the pupil premium. Analysis of tracking data is shared with staff and governors. This enables governors and senior staff to hold teachers to account for students’ progress. Performance management procedures now take more account of progress information and all teachers have targets for their students’ progress in key skills. Middle managers use information from their monitoring to inform department meetings. This enables them to set objective targets with their teams and to identify training needs. Provision for students with special educational needs has been reorganised to provide additional support to any student who might benefit from it.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body has used the findings from the external review to reshape its committee structure and reorganise its links with departments to better hold senior leaders to account. The training provided to the clerk to the governors has ensured that the minutes of governing body meetings indicate more clearly the challenge made by governors to senior leaders and the actions that follow.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the academy until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

Your academy is appropriately drawing on the support of three others, Yardley’s, High Ercal and Kingswinford. The academies have similar contexts thus staff can identify good practice in each other’s institutions that they could feasibly implement themselves. The collaboration is in its early stages and it is too soon to see its impact.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Sandwell.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion