Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Russell Bennett
- Postcode verified
SE22 9LA
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment23
“Action plans are put swiftly in place where elements of teaching are weak.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 995
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
David Block Headteacher Heber Primary School Heber Road Lordship Lane London SE22 9LA
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 20 November 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in September 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
School
ensure that identified leaders and governors fully evaluate the impact of actions to raise achievement at each key checkpoint.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I met with you, the deputy headteacher, other senior leaders, the Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I scrutinised a range of school documentation, including: the school’s action plan, information about pupils’ Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com achievement and records relating to the monitoring of teaching. I visited a range of classes with you and your deputy to see teaching and look at pupils’ work.
p.1
Context
Since the last inspection three vacancies on the governing body have been filled.
p.2
Main findings
Since the last inspection the headteacher, ably supported by his deputy have acted decisively to raise expectations and quicken the pace of improvement. Teachers are clear about what is expected and are committed to ensuring that all groups of pupils make better progress from their individual starting points. The school’s action plan focuses sharply on key areas for improvement. Milestones which demonstrate a sufficient sense of urgency are in place. However, there is a lack of clarity about who will evaluate the impact of each action and how this will be done.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders have rightly focused on improving the quality of teaching. They have observed all staff in the relatively short time since the last inspection. They have given each teacher helpful feedback about their strengths and areas for development. Action plans are put swiftly in place where elements of teaching are weak. Importantly, leaders make regular checks to ensure that the necessary improvements have taken place.
p.2
Main findings
In their drive to develop teachers’ skills, leaders have provided training and feedback specifically on the quality of assessment and feedback to pupils. The impact of this is clearly evidenced in lesson observation records and pupils’ books. For example, teachers are checking more regularly on pupils’ different rates of learning and adjusting activities to suit their individual needs. They are making use of more probing questioning to develop pupils’ thinking and to provide greater stretch and challenge. As a result, pupils are making better progress, including the most able and pupils with special educational needs.
p.2
Main findings
Teachers mark books frequently and provide helpful feedback to pupils. They follow the school’s new marking policy and the use of the ‘tickled pink’ and ‘green for growth’ colour coding is developing pupils’ skills and accuracy. Leaders are aware that expectations of how pupils should respond are not yet consistent across all subjects and year groups. They are conducting regular book checks and lesson drop- ins to tackle this.
p.2
Main findings
School leaders have sharpened the focus on the teaching of writing. This includes a whole-school focus on improving pupils’ use of grammar and punctuation. They have adjusted the curriculum so that an extra writing lesson is provided for Year 4 pupils. This is helping pupils to develop their skills and knowledge more securely. In order to improve progress in mathematics, the school has organised pupils into ability sets in Year 4, as well as in Years 5 and 6, so that teaching and support can be targeted precisely. The school’s mathematics coordinator has provided additional training and support for teachers to develop their skills. This approach, together with opportunities to share good practice and plan with others, is improving mathematics teaching.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders have recognised the need to develop the skills of other leaders and managers. They have introduced more regular assessment checkpoints to track the progress of pupils. The use this information to analyse the impact of teaching on pupils’ achievement. Middle leaders are fully involved in supporting and monitoring the quality of teaching. They provide effective training and support to help teachers improve their skills through team teaching and joint planning. They meet regularly to evaluate the impact of their work.
p.3
Main findings
Governors are offering increasing levels of challenge and strengthening their capacity to provide challenge and support. They have booked an external review of governance and a review of teaching and learning for January 2014. The Chair of the Governing Body is resolutely focused on driving a more rapid pace of change. Governors are quickly extending their knowledge and understanding of the variety of ways in which school performance can be assessed.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The local authority has increased its level of support since the last inspection and further consultancy visits are planned. Representatives have visited the school to sharpen the school’s understanding of the improvement process. Effective support has been provided by a local authority Early Years consultant. This has enabled the school to clarify and develop its assessment procedures, so that progress can be more precisely tracked across the Early Years Foundation Stage and into Year 1.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Southwark.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion