Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Dec 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Katrina Gueli

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Katrina Gueli

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−14Mixedmore positive than 18% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingimproving
Criticismdisruptionnot sufficientlynot stronglowlowernot clearlynot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: hcarnall@cfbt.com

p.1

Ms Andrea Barnes Headteacher Wetherby High School Hallfield Lane Wetherby West Yorkshire LS22 6JS

p.1

Education act 2005 to Wetherby High School

Following my visit to your school on 19 November 2013 with Helen Storey Senior HMI, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave us and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Education act 2005 to Wetherby High School

The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in October 2012. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders and middle leaders, members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority. The school improvement plan and various monitoring and evaluation documents were also scrutinised. The main focus of the monitoring visit was the progress of low and middle attaining students. We observed a number of lessons, scrutinised students’ work and held a meeting with a group of students.

p.1

Context

A new deputy headteacher joined the school in September 2013.

p.1

Main findings

You, senior leaders and the governing body have accepted the inspection judgements and have introduced a number of strategies to bring about improvements. However, given the time since the last section 5 inspection, these have not had sufficient impact on improving the progress and attainment of all students to ensure the school is securely on track to be judged ‘good’ at its next inspection. Your school improvement plan has been revised to focus on the areas for improvement identified by the inspection alongside your other priorities. However, it does not focus sharply enough on the improving the progress and attainment of specific groups of students who are not achieving as well as they should. The school’s latest data show that middle attaining students achieve less well in English and lower attaining students achieve less well in mathematics. One reason these students make slower progress in lessons is because work is not matched carefully enough to their needs.

p.2

Main findings

As a result, not all students remain engaged and interested in their learning and low level disruption occurs. Some students who spoke with inspectors were dissatisfied with this situation; they did not feel that all teachers were meeting their needs or that they are making the progress they would like.

p.2

Main findings

Student target-setting and tracking is not clearly understood by all students. For some students the marks and comments they receive from their teachers on their work do not match the overall assessments that the school makes of how well they are doing. While subject leaders are using students’ targets and data about their progress to plan interventions the overall picture of a student’s progress is not sufficiently clear to all teachers or to the student.

p.2

Main findings

Strategies have been introduced to improve the quality of teaching and the school’s own records show that the number of good and outstanding lessons is increasing. Most teaching observed during this monitoring inspection required improvement because it did not meet the specific needs of the students so learning and progress were not good.

p.2

Main findings

● ensure lesson observations focus specifically on checking whether teaching is enabling students of all abilities to achieve well.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted will continue to monitor the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The school is receiving support from the local authority. The local authority led review in May 2013 gave a realistic assessment of the school’s position. The school has not formed a strong partnership with a good or outstanding local school that is helping to accelerate improvement but Specialist Leaders of Education have undertaken work in English, mathematics and science.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for Leeds.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion