Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Building Bridges Care Homes Ltd in St Helens
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
6 Nov 2013
- Inspectors verified
Maria McGranaghan
- URN verified
SC063284
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance3
“On the whole behaviour management strategies are improved.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 751
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC063284 Inspection date 06/11/2013 Inspector Maria McGranaghan Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 14/05/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
The home is provided by an independent company and provides care for five young people with emotional and behavioural difficulties.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress .
p.3
Progress
The purpose of this visit is to assess the progress made since the last inspection and how any progress has improved the quality of care and potential outcomes for young people.
p.3
Progress
At the last inspection on 14 May 2013 the service was judged as good. At the time the registered manager was asked to take account of four recommendations made to further improve practice within the home.
p.3
Progress
The service is judged as making satisfactory progress. Young people now make a valuable contribution to the review of their care arrangements. For example, young people clearly record in their own words how the home is helping them to reach their personal goals and aspirations. Consequently, young people take a greater interest in the development of their placement plan and are keen to participate in reviewing their personal progress.
p.3
Progress
Young people’s bedrooms are significantly improved. Young people are active participants in creating a bedroom that reflects their personality and interests. Likewise, young people have played a central role in deciding the colour scheme for the newly decorated living room, entrance hall and dining area. Consequently, young people now take a pride in their home and this has also resulted in a significant decrease in damage occurring in the home.
p.3
Progress
On the whole behaviour management strategies are improved. The manager has developed strategies alongside individual risk assessments for the appropriate management of young people who were found to smoke in the home. Young people are clear on the specified sanction and as a result, incidents of young people smoking in the home have decreased.
p.4
Progress
At the time of the inspection there were no young people with a plan of independence in order to suitably assess the moving on and leaving care arrangements. However, the manager has developed a system in order to review the quality of pathway plans and independent training arrangements for young people in the future. Reviewing the quality of arrangements will ensure that young people are provided with opportunities to contribute to the development of their independence plan, including setting realistic goals and targets.
p.4
Progress
Young people benefit from structured routines enabling them to understand the plans for each day. They participate in a range of planned and unplanned activities such as, fishing, youth club, gym and ice skating and have made friends in the local community. Young people are happy and settled in the home.
p.4
Progress
Young people benefit from educational placements that meet their individual needs. Consequently, young people‘s views about education are developed with young people being positive about their education. As a result, both attendance and attainment are significantly improved.
p.4
Progress
Despite these strengths there is an area for improvement. Information provided by the home in relation to schedule 5 notifications is not always clear. For example, some records do not give a clear picture of the actions taken by staff once an event has taken place. Consequently, some notifications lack clarity and are open to misinterpretation. As a result one recommendation is made at this inspection. The home shows the capacity to improve.
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
ensure the written record includes details of the actions taken, and the outcome of any investigation following a notifiable event (NMS 24.2)
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion