Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Alameda Middle School

Inspected 20 Nov 2013 · published 5 Dec 2013 · URN 137249

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Robin Sidaway (lead), Gillian Scobie, Michael Sutherland-Harper

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    20 Nov 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Gillian Scobie, Michael Sutherland-Harper, Robin Sidaway

  • Postcode verified

    MK45 2QR

  • Name on report verified

    Alameda Middle School

  • URN verified

    137249

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+48Positivemore positive than 49% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandinghighly effectiveexcellentmake good progresseffectiveconsistentlystronghigh quality
Criticisminadequateinconsistentrequires improvementnot yetpoorseriousweaknessesnot outstanding

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1392w+55
  • Leadership740w+32
  • What needs to improve77w+64

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,123
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 46%Leadership 25%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 27%

Full report text

P R O T E C T – I N S P E C T I O N School report

p.1

Alameda Middle School Station Road, Ampthill, Bedford, MK45 2QR

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Not previously inspected This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Outstanding 1 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Pupils attain well in English, mathematics and other subjects and make good progress as they proceed through the school.  Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs make similar progress to their peers.  Pupils make good progress in reading due to its widespread development across all subjects along with the pupils’ own enthusiasm for using the well-stocked library.  Teaching is usually good and sometimes outstanding.  Pupils have highly positive attitudes to learning and their behaviour across the school is almost always impeccable.  Pupils feel safe and their parents agree. Safeguarding and child protection arrangements are highly effective.  High attendance ensures pupils make the most of the time available to them for learning.  The acting headteacher, acting deputy headteachers and governing body are effectively implementing clear plans for improving teaching and attainment.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Teachers responsible for leading different subjects within the school are effectively developing their roles to ensure teaching continues to improve.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 Not enough teaching is outstanding. Opportunities to share best practice are increasing but are not yet regular enough.  Pupils do not always understand how to improve their work or respond to guidance given.  Subject leaders’ checking on the quality of learning is developing well but is occasionally inconsistent.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed 26 lessons taught by 22 staff, including observations carried out jointly with members of the senior leadership team.  The inspection team held meetings with the acting headteacher and 2 acting deputy headteachers, governors, staff, the school improvement adviser and groups of pupils.  Inspectors took account of the 78 responses on the Parent View website and also analysed 42 staff questionnaire responses.  Inspectors observed the school’s work. They looked at the school’s improvement plan, self- evaluation, data on pupils’ attainment and progress, a range of policies, arrangements for safeguarding pupils, monitoring procedures, records of behaviour and attendance and governing body documentation.  Pupils’ books were examined both in lessons and in a separate work sample with senior staff.  Inspectors listened to pupils reading.

p.2

Inspection team

Robin Sidaway, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Michael Sutherland-Harper Additional Inspector Gillian Scobie Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 The school is larger than the average-sized middle school. The very large majority of the pupils are White British.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs supported through school action is below the national average. The proportion supported through school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is also below the national average.  The proportion of pupils for whom the school receives the pupil premium is below average. This is additional government funding for particular groups of pupils, including those known to be eligible for free school meals or in local authority care.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.  Alameda Middle School converted to become an academy school on 1 st August 2011. When its predecessor school, Alameda Middle School, was last inspected by Ofsted, it was judged to be

p.3

Information about this school

good.  The school has an acting headteacher and 2 acting deputy headteachers. The new headteacher will take up her post in January 2014.  The school is in a loose pyramid federation with one other local middle school and one local upper school. The headteacher of the local upper school, who is a national leader of education, works closely with the school to ensure effective transition arrangements.  The school does not use alternative provision.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise the quality of all teaching to good or outstanding by:  identifying and sharing existing best practice in classroom skills across all lessons  ensuring that marking and assessment procedures always identify next steps that pupils need to take to improve their work  checking that pupils respond promptly to teachers’ written guidance.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Ensure that subject leaders’ checking and evaluation of pupils’ progress and attainment now develop consistently to the very highest of standards.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Attainment on entry is above the level expected nationally and has been for some time. English is slightly stronger than mathematics.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils make good progress as they move through the school so that by the end of Key Stage 2 in 2012, their attainment at Level 4 and Level 5 in English and mathematics was considerably above the national average.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Between 2011 and 2012, there was an increase in the proportion of pupils making expected progress in English, and in mathematics the proportion remained approximately the same; in both subjects in 2012 the proportions were above national figures.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 2013 progress rates dipped in English and in mathematics as a result of variations in teaching quality which the school has quickly addressed. On the basis of data currently available, results in 2014 are expected to return to their previously high level.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Progress and attainment continue at a high level throughout Years 7 and 8 (Key Stage 3) in both English and mathematics and are reflected in pupils’ subsequent progress, as confirmed by the headteacher of the linked upper school.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 More able pupils make good progress because learning is carefully adjusted to encourage them to develop their investigative skills in and beyond the classroom.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils eligible for the pupil premium make similar progress to their peers and sometimes exceed it. They are currently two terms behind in mathematics and slightly less so in English, but the gap is closing rapidly. Both the pupil premium funding and the Year 7 catch-up premium ensure that literacy and numeracy develop well because of one to one and small group support.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs make similar progress to their peers because their needs are quickly analysed and support is tailored to their individual needs.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils make very good progress in reading because the school has provided excellent facilities. For example, a highly stimulating range of books and displays in the library ensure that a very large number of pupils spend every lunch hour reading. Frequent reading in class, including reading aloud, means that there is little need for the reinforcement of sounds and letters.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 As a result of good teaching across the school, including an innovative approach to linking topics in geography, history and English, pupils make good progress in foundation subjects.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils say that they enjoy school because teachers help them to believe that they can achieve almost anything.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching seen during the inspection was usually good or better. A very small number of lessons seen required improvement or were inadequate. All observations carried out with senior leaders during the inspection resulted in agreed grades. The profile of teaching seen by the inspectors matched the school’s own record of lesson observations.  Where teaching was most effective, teachers had strong subject knowledge and demonstrated activities well to ensure pupils could proceed to high quality next steps. Teachers made good use of questions and adjusted tasks in lessons to ensure that very strong responses from pupils continued.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 In a Year 8 art lesson, the teacher focused carefully on the progress pupils made over time and ensured it increased by using stimuli such as a visit to the Henry Moore Foundation to encourage high quality outcomes.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Pupils have good opportunities to work independently and in smaller groups because most teachers ensure that activities are equally shared between them and the pupils. As a result, pupils engage well with activities in the full range of subjects.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs are well supported because teachers and teaching assistants work well together in lessons to meet their needs. Small group activities are conducted with good pace and there are clear expectations that pupils will reach higher levels.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 More able pupils are encouraged in lessons by open-ended tasks such as imagining what it was like to be in the trenches in the First World War and then making an appropriate response through creating a descriptive poem.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Literacy and numeracy are well taught. Most teachers link other subjects to these two areas. In a Year 5 history lesson the teacher emphasised that the way pupils expressed themselves was crucial to their success in representing historical facts on one side of an argument.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Self and peer assessment is well developed; for example, during a physical education lesson, basketball shooting was videoed in order that pupils could identify areas that they could improve individually against key assessment criteria.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Marking and assessment by teachers are regular. Presentation of pupils’ work is generally neat. However, teachers are inconsistent in indicating the next steps for pupils to take in order to improve their work. In most, but not all cases, pupils follow up on written comments made by teachers in their books.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Sharing of best practice in classroom skills is developing but is still inconsistent.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 Pupils work consistently well; they enjoy their lessons and display a love of learning. For example, in a Year 8 information and communications technology lesson, pupils were keen to explain the websites they were designing and the processes they were using. They were very keen to move on with their work, which was exciting them.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 Pupils have excellent attitudes to learning and display a readiness to expand their horizons, as shown clearly by their commitment to reading. The library is used as an excellent resource and is often full at lunchtime with pupils exchanging books or reading quietly.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 All members of staff have consistent, high expectations of behaviour. Pupils are fully aware of the rewards and sanctions associated with good or poor behaviour, as exemplified by the ‘consequences staircase’ that is displayed widely throughout the school.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 Pupils feel safe in school and the vast majority of their parents agreed on the online survey and through the school’s own parental surveys.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 Pupils’ behaviour across the school is almost always impeccable. During the inspection, they responded very quickly and responsibly to adverse weather conditions at the beginning of break and made sure that everyone was able to move inside promptly and safely.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 Pupils are fully aware of the different forms of bullying. Inspectors were impressed by a series of posters in the school hall, one for each year group, which every pupil has signed as part of the school’s anti-bullying week.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are outstanding

 Attendance is high and has been so over time. Exclusions are well below national figures. The school has detailed systems in place to ensure that whenever pupils do not attend, follow up is quick and effective. Parents are fully involved in this monitoring process. Pupils are punctual to lessons.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The acting headteacher, senior leadership team and governors have a shared vision of a continually improving school. They have accurately identified those areas of teaching and achievement that require improvement to reach the very highest standards. Their self-evaluation is accurate.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Teachers benefit from a range of professional development opportunities which the school has put in place through their loose federation, for example, to ensure the accurate moderation of pupils’ work.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Performance management procedures are rigorous and developing to meet the needs of both the teaching staff and the non-teaching staff.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The range of subjects taught across the school is broad, balanced and under constant review. The themes covered in lessons encourage pupils to carry out further research and ensure that their attitudes to learning are very positive. There is high extra-curricular participation in a wide range of areas including PE and music.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Spiritual, moral, social and cultural understanding is well developed as shown for example by the commitment of the school council to improving the school. Regular opportunities to reinforce literacy are well embedded across all year groups, but slightly less well developed in numeracy.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The school has drawn up a clear programme for the allocation of funding for PE development in conjunction with local providers. This includes opportunities for pupils to access a wide range of sports and aims to look at sustaining physical and health development over time.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The school improvement adviser has worked closely with the school, supporting the senior leadership team in the interim period before the new headteacher takes up her post, assisting the work of the governing body and improving the rigour of monitoring.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Subject leaders are focused on more closely checking and evaluating the progress and attainment of pupils in their area of learning. However, some inconsistencies remain in their approach.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Safeguarding procedures and child protection arrangements are highly effective and meet all current requirements.

p.7

The leadership and management are good

 The school works closely with the local upper school to ensure effective transition arrangements and shares an analysis of data to track subsequent success

p.7

The leadership and management are good

 Links with parents are good. The school is seeking to develop parents’ role in reinforcing the work of the school.

p.7

The leadership and management are good

 The school’s capacity for sustained improvement is good because the senior leadership team and the governing body work in effective collaboration and have correctly identified the areas for improvement; their self-evaluation is accurate.

p.7

The leadership and management are good

 The governance of the school:  Governors visit the school regularly and have identified where teaching is best as a result. They have undertaken training to improve their analysis of data and ensure they have a good understanding of the pupils’ achievement. Governors provide effective challenge and support and have agreed with senior leaders that the next steps for the school are to improve the quality of all teaching to at least good or outstanding and maintain achievement at consistently high levels. They have a good understanding of how performance management of staff is linked to target setting, support and progression through pay scales. They delayed the appointment of the new headteacher until they had found the appropriate candidate, all the while recognising the good leadership skills which have resulted in the development of the current senior leadership team.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 137249 Local authority Central Bedfordshire Inspection number 429625

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Middle deemed secondary School category Academy converter Age range of pupils 9 – 13 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 596 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Mark Watchorm Headteacher James Adkins (Acting) Date of previous school inspection Not previously inspected Telephone number 01525 750900 Fax number 01525 750901 Email address schooloffice@alameda.beds.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion