Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 3 Dec 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Prue Rayner

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Prue Rayner

  • Postcode verified

    HP3 9LN

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−38Criticalmore positive than 9% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisemake good progresseffectivelyaccurateclearimproving
Criticismweaknot sufficientlylackslownot clearlimitednot effectivenot rigorous

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
748
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Angela Belgrove Headteacher Lime Walk Primary School Lime Walk Bennetts End HP3 9LN

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 13 November 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in June 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are not taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection and plans are not sharply focused on rapidly bringing about improvement. You should take immediate action to:

p.1

School

 ensure that all teachers receive accurate and helpful feedback on the quality of their teaching

p.1

School

 improve the accuracy of assessments in Early Years Foundation Stage and in mathematics

p.1

School

 implement the outcomes of the external review of governance. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 6799169 Direct email : mathew.mitchell@serco.com

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, the Early Years and Key Stage 1 Leader, four governors and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. I also evaluated your post-inspection action plan, visited classrooms and looked at work in pupils’ books.

p.2

Context

Since the previous inspection, you have appointed one new teacher. School leaders are now receiving support from a Local Leader of Education. The local authority has reviewed the effectiveness of the governing body.

p.2

Main findings

Your school has made a slow start to addressing the points for improvement highlighted in the previous report. Your improvement work is not sufficiently focused and there is not enough evidence that actions taken so far will quickly raise achievement or improve the quality of teaching. For example, you have included the improvement of mathematics and literacy in the action plan but the targets set for pupils in these subjects lack clarity and challenge. In addition, the processes for checking the impact of the plan are not rigorous.

p.2

Main findings

As part of the monitoring visit, Her Majesty’s Inspectors and senior leaders observed parts of four lessons. However, some of the school’s judgements about the quality of teaching and learning seen were over-generous. Senior leaders did not have high enough expectations of the level of challenge that should be provided to pupils to ensure that they make good progress. It is also clear that pupils’ calculation skills are weak.

p.2

Main findings

Staff are receiving a significant amount of support from local authority advisers and are attending training events, senior leaders are also providing staff with information about the quality of their teaching. It is not clear, however, exactly what each teacher needs to do to rapidly improve. A considerable sum of money and time is being used to improve teaching. However, governors do not receive the necessary information about the impact of spending on the quality of teaching to be able to judge if this use of resources is giving value for money.

p.2

Main findings

There are currently five vacancies on the governing body. Governors are committed to ensuring the school improves to good, but the limited numbers mean the workload is high. Governors are implementing the governance review and the local authority is providing focused training. Governors judge that this training will help them hold you and other leaders to account for the school’s performance more effectively than in the past. Ofsted will carry out further visits and provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The local authority is providing a significant amount of support through an improvement partner, teaching and learning advisers for mathematics, literacy and early years, a leading teacher and an advanced skills teacher. It is also providing advice on governance. There is some very early evidence of the impact of their work on improving teaching in upper Key Stage Two and in the Early Years Foundation Stage. To further increase capacity, the local authority should consider partnering this school with a high performing local school.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hertfordshire local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion