Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 2 Dec 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tim Bristow

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Tim Bristow

  • Postcode verified

    S18 7TA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+49Positivemore positive than 49% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivehigh expectationspositivelystrongly
Criticismrequires improvement

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
668
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
17%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mr J Brookes Executive Headteacher Barlow CofE Primary School Millcross Lane Barlow S18 7TA

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 11 November 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in February 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School

 challenge all pupils, particularly the most able, throughout the whole lesson and not just when they are expected to work on their own  make sure that all teachers give good advice when they are marking to rectify misunderstanding and consolidate learning  use assessment information to identify specifically the proportion of pupils that exceed the expected level of progress.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, members of the governing body, a representative of the local authority and teaching staff to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. Assessment information, marking and work in books was Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 01216 799169 Direct email : mathew.mitchell@serco.com scrutinised. I visited all classes in the school to observe teaching and learning. I attended a recent governing body meeting on 17 October to judge the quality of governance.

p.1

Context

Since the previous monitoring inspection in May 2013 the headteacher has retired and the governing body has appointed an executive headteacher on a temporary contract who has responsibility for leadership in this school and another local school. Currently, the governing body is recruiting a new headteacher who is expected to take up post in September 2014.

p.2

Main findings

The leadership of teaching and achievement has continued to improve and has led to a marked increase in the proportion of good teaching. Teachers have benefited from effective coaching and training to strengthen their practice. There still remains some teaching that requires improvement. Where this occurs, some pupils, particularly the most able, are not challenged sufficiently. For example, at the start of the lesson they have to listen to the teacher giving instructions even if they are not relevant to them.

p.2

Main findings

All teachers comply with the marking policy and many pupils respond positively to the comments made. Some of the advice given is not helpful enough in addressing misconceptions or to check that pupils have understood the task.

p.2

Main findings

The executive headteacher has made good use of assessment information so that governors and staff have a good understanding of the progress of individual pupils. They check carefully that all pupils are making the expected progress. A proportion of pupils exceed the expected progress, but the school is not able to demonstrate well enough whether this is favourable when compared to national expectations.

p.2

Main findings

Governors are much more effective at supporting and challenging the executive headteacher to lead improvements. They have high expectations of the school and demonstrated at a recent governing body meeting that the determination to being judged a good school features very strongly in all discussions and decisions they make.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The headteacher and governors have benefited from a good balance of training, support and challenge that is making a useful contribution to the strengthening of the overall effectiveness of the school. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Derbyshire and the Director of Education for Derby Diocese.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion