Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

The John Bamford Primary School

Inspected 13 Nov 2013 · published 29 Nov 2013 · URN 124171

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Nov 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    David Westall, Deirdre Lyddy, Doris Bell

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    WS15 2PA

  • Name on report verified

    The John Bamford Primary School

  • URN verified

    124171

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2011.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+62Positivemore positive than 31% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingmake good progresseffectivelygood progressexcellentimprovedhighly effectivevery effective
Criticisminadequaterequires improvementdo not knowgapsseriousweaknessesnot outstandingnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1364w+76
  • Leadership774w+39
  • What needs to improve117w+69

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,181
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 48
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 45%Leadership 26%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

The John Bamford Primary School Crabtree Way, Etching Hill, Rugeley, WS15 2PA

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  The school leadership’s determination and drive have successfully improved teaching and learning since the previous inspection.  Standards are rising as a result of good and sometimes outstanding teaching and pupils achieve well. In the pupils’ words, ‘teachers make learning fun in this school’.  The practice of bringing different subjects together in ‘adventures’ fosters a love of learning and a sense of wonderment in pupils as they find additional things out for themselves.  Pupils feel safe and well-cared for. They are proud of how well they are doing. They appreciate the ‘tickets to success’ that show them how to get better and better.  The pupils’ good behaviour ensures that learning proceeds uninterrupted in lessons and that play and lunchtimes are happy, social occasions.  Governors know the school well. They monitor its work and challenge it to do even better. They use training opportunities effectively to

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

give them the skills to do these things.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 There is not enough outstanding teaching to enable pupils in all year groups to make rapid progress at all times.  Teachers do not have enough opportunities to observe and learn from the best practice in the school.  Pupils are not given sufficient opportunities to write at length in literacy or in ‘adventures’ sessions.  Pupils do not know their tables or number facts well enough to help them calculate rapidly in mathematics.  School improvement and subject action planning does not focus sufficiently on outcomes for the pupils.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed teaching in 28 lessons. Five of the observations were carried out jointly with members of the senior leadership team.  Play and lunchtimes were observed and discussions were held with pupils, governors, staff, and a representative of the local authority.  The views of 40 parents were analysed through the Parent View website. Parents’ views were also obtained informally at the start of the school day.  The team took account of the 15 questionnaires completed by staff at the school.  Inspectors looked closely at a wide range of documents, including information about pupils’ progress, the school’s improvement plan, subject action plans, the school’s self-evaluation document and records and policies relating to safeguarding.  Inspectors also scrutinised teachers’ planning and the work in pupils’ books, observed sessions where pupils were learning to link letters and sounds (phonics) and listened to pupils read.

p.2

Inspection team

Doris Bell, Lead inspector Additional Inspector David Westall Additional Inspector Deirdre Lyddy Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 The school is larger than the average-sized primary school.  Very few pupils come from minority ethnic backgrounds and/or speak English as an additional language.  The proportion of pupils for whom the school receives additional funding, known as the pupil premium, is below average. In this school the funding is for children in local authority care and pupils who are known to be eligible for free school meals.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs, who are supported through school action, is average. The proportion supported at school action plus, or who have a statement of special educational needs, is above average.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.  There have been several staff changes since the previous inspection, including at management level.  Privately-run before- and after-school clubs, and a pre-school group known as the ‘JB Tots’,

p.3

Information about this school

operate on the school premises. They are inspected separately.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Encourage a greater proportion of outstanding teaching in all year groups by:  giving teachers the opportunity to observe and learn from the outstanding practice already evident in parts of the school.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve pupils’ progress in writing and mathematics by:  building more opportunities for pupils to complete extended pieces of writing into literacy lessons and other subjects  increasing pupils’ knowledge of multiplication tables and sharpening their ability to recall mathematical facts rapidly  ensuring they respond promptly to the guidance they receive when teachers mark their work.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Incorporate quantifiable targets relating to pupil performance into the school improvement and subject action plans so that progress towards priorities can be more easily measured.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Children start Nursery with skills below those expected for their age, particularly in language and number. Progress has improved in this age group since the previous inspection and is now good. As a result, children are well-prepared for their work in Year 1.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils enjoy reading, and they read well. Pupils in Year 1 did well in the phonics screening in 2013 and, when inspectors heard them reading, used these skills effectively to read tricky or unfamiliar words. Boys’ reading is improving because the school has ensured that the range of texts offered appeal to boys as well as girls.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Results in Year 6 fell slightly in 2013 but have generally been above average in English and mathematics over time. More-able pupils make good progress overall. The dip in overall results and in the proportion of pupils reaching the higher levels in 2013 was reflected in the learning difficulties experienced by a number of pupils in that particular year group.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Year 6 pupils did well in the grammar, spelling and punctuation test, which was new in 2013. Pupils present their work well but their ability to write at length varies from class to class. Although pupils use their writing skills well in ‘adventure’ work, they are not expected to write at length often enough.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils enjoy mathematics and they understand its importance in everyday life. Nevertheless, their progress is sometimes limited because they do not know their times tables or number facts well enough to enable them to calculate rapidly.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The school ensure pupils receiving the additional pupil premium make good progress and that any gaps between their attainment and other pupils are closing. In 2013, there was hardly any difference in mathematics, compared with a gap of over two terms nationally. In reading and writing, the gaps were just over one term, compared with over two terms nationally. The additional funding for these pupils is used effectively to support individual and small group teaching. All support programmes are kept under constant review to ensure they are working.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs also make the same good progress as other pupils. Skilled teaching and support staff attend to the pupils’ needs with clear targets and individualised programmes that are constantly checked to ensure their effectiveness.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The very small number of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds and pupils who speak English as an additional language achieve well and make good progress.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching enthuses and inspires pupils because learning is well-planned to match their different needs and allow them to pursue some of their own interests. For example, in one lesson where Year 4 pupils were studying the Vikings, they used their literacy, numeracy and computer skills effectively to research different information, which they then shared with others. Pupils benefit from additional booster classes that also involve the headteacher or teachers from local high schools.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Reading is taught well and teachers use many different methods to help pupils learn. In most lessons, they constantly check and adjust learning in response to how well pupils are doing. They teach pupils how to assess their own work and how to help others improve theirs. This was noted in a Year 2 lesson, where pupils suggested how others could improve the role play that was helping them to understand characters in a story.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Learning is made real for pupils so that they can see the relevance of it. Their good subject knowledge enables teachers to question, probe and extend pupils’ knowledge and understanding. In a series of outstanding Year 6 sessions, pupils were given an excellent range of well-prepared resources, and very effective questioning and discussion enabled pupils to understand the plot in a Shakespeare play, relate it to modern life and conclude that the plays are accessible to primary school pupils.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Pupils who qualify for the pupil premium funding are spread across groups according to their ability. Teachers and well-briefed support staff help these pupils, and disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs, to make good progress by breaking their learning into the smaller steps they need to take to experience success.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Pupils’ work is usually marked well, with guidance on how it can be improved. Pupils respond by doing corrections but not always straight away. This sometimes limits the effectiveness of the guidance they are offered. Nevertheless, pupils know their targets and appreciate the ‘tickets to success’ that help them understand the next steps to take.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Children are taught well in Nursery and Reception, indoors and out, thus ensuring their good progress.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Children settle quickly in Nursery and reception. As in the rest of the school, start-of-day learning activities set the scene and put them in the mood for learning. Virtually all pupils develop good independent skills alongside learning to work well together in pairs and groups.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils very much appreciate how staff encourage them to learn, saying, for example, that their ‘teacher is passionate about reading and learning and therefore so are we’. Pupils accept, trust and respect each other and adults, regardless of background or culture. They state confidently that ‘everyone fits in in this school’.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils understand how their good behaviour and positive attitudes in lessons and around the school help their learning. The school is vigilant about teaching pupils to keep themselves safe, including when using computers, and particularly social networking sites, as well as cameras and mobile phones. Bullying incidents are very rare but pupils know what to do should they know of or experience any. They are confident that staff will always help them should they have concerns of any kind.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 All parents spoken to during the inspection were very satisfied with what the school does for their children and for them. They said that their children were safe, happy and made good progress, and confirmed that staff, including the headteacher, always made themselves available to them. Inspectors found no evidence to substantiate the negative responses from a small minority of parents that were submitted to the Ofsted online questionnaire.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Attendance is average. Although it has improved recently, a small number of persistent absentees hold it down. The school is doing everything possible, including involving external agencies, to impress on the pupils and their parents the importance of regular attendance and the impact of any absence on pupils’ progress.

p.5

The leadership and management are good

 The headteacher’s vision and drive have kept the school firmly on the road to improvement since the previous inspection. She has successfully established effective teamwork among staff and governors, all of whom share her vision to make the school outstanding.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Leaders and managers at different levels fulfil their roles well because the headteacher enables them to do so. The responsibilities given to leaders of different combinations of year groups ensure pupils make a smooth transition from one phase and year to the next and helps them move confidently on to the High School.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Staff readily respond to the support and guidance they receive as part of the rigorous management of their performance. Well-considered professional development opportunities help them to improve further, although best practices in teaching from within the school are not shared widely enough.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The school’s self-evaluation is accurate and well-evidenced. It is securely based on information gained from the meticulous tracking of pupils’ progress, an in-depth analysis of data, and the outcomes of the systematic monitoring of teaching and learning.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Leaders set ambitious targets for pupils and staff and work hard to ensure they are met. The school improvement and subject action plans help to keep it on track. However, in these plans, the steps to success do not include quantifiable data to enable the school to measure the impact of these plans on pupils’ outcomes.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The provision for disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs is managed well as is the provision for children in Nursery and Reception, enabling all such pupils to make good progress.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Literacy and numeracy skills are promoted well in all subjects, particularly through the ‘adventure’ approach that makes learning enjoyable. However, pupils are given insufficient or only irregular opportunities to practise writing at length so that they can take this aspect of their writing further.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Visits and visitors and well-attended clubs are used effectively as springboards for structuring work across all subjects. Excellent use of outdoors for Forest Schools and physical education also contributes to the pupils’ good progress, as do the many opportunities pupils have to learn in and through the arts.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Safeguarding procedures, including for child protection, meet the government’s current requirements and all training is up to date. The school tackles discrimination effectively, ensuring equality of opportunity for all. Work in different subjects and links with other schools give pupils an understanding of cultures beyond their own.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The local authority proves an appropriate level of support for this improving school. It is confident in its capacity to improve further, as is the inspection team.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The governance of the school:  Governors know the school well. They support and challenge it in equal measure and have a good understanding of data relating to pupils’ progress and attainment. They gain their information from visits, meetings with relevant staff, and from accompanying the headteacher as she monitors teaching and learning. They have sharpened their skills through training, and help the headteacher to make decisions about pay based on staff performance. They also support her in tackling underperformance. They check the impact of all spending, including pupil premium funding, and make sure it is helping to improve pupils’ progress. They have made sensible decisions about the use of the primary schools sports funding to widen the range of sporting activities available to the pupils and to raise staff expertise in the teaching of physical education.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 124171 Local authority Staffordshire Inspection number 426996

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 348 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Joanne Carter Headteacher Louise Thomas Burns Date of previous school inspection 9 November 2011 Telephone number 01889 256160 Fax number 01889 256160 Email address office@johnbamford.staffs.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion