Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 29 Nov 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Alan Taylor-Bennett

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Alan Taylor-Bennett

  • Postcode verified

    PO22 9PZ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+60Positivemore positive than 58% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandinghighly effectivestrongclearclearlyeffectivesupportiverigorous
Criticismlackcompromiselimited

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,074
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
24 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Miss K Buzzing & Mr C Silk Headteachers South Bersted CofE Primary School Church Lane Bognor Regis West Sussex PO22 9PZ

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 8 November 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in July 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Primary School

 make strong links with good and outstanding schools to broaden and deepen understanding of what constitutes good teaching and learning, and highly effective middle leadership  refine the development plan by including indicators that actions are having the desired effect, throughout the year  improve quality control and accountability in some areas by clearly identifying who is responsible for outcomes in those areas.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit I met with both of you, with six members of the governing body, a representative of the diocese and a representative of the local authority, to discuss Tribal 1–4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01173115323 Direct email :suzy.smith@tribalgroup.com the actions taken since the last inspection. I also visited all classrooms briefly. I evaluated the school improvement plan.

p.1

Context

Since the previous inspection you, as deputy headteacher and headteacher, have entered into a co-headteacher arrangement.

p.2

Main findings

You both show commitment to ensuring that the achievement of pupils improves to become good, because of teaching that will be at least good, and strong leadership and management at all levels. The governors are highly supportive of this ambition; they offer useful challenge and support.

p.2

Main findings

Your development plan addresses the appropriate priorities, and it is a useful working document. It contains clear descriptions of the impact of the improvements you will bring about, but it does not provide details of the steps along the way. This lack of interim measures could compromise the quality of governors’ monitoring throughout the year. There is also an apparent lack of external validation of key aspects of your work at important points in the year. For example, there is no mention of occasional external checks on the quality of teaching and of pupils’ attainment in reading, writing and mathematics. You reassured me that there are arrangements in place to enable these external checks to happen, but they need adapting to suit the new approaches you are taking in your plans to transform achievement.

p.2

Main findings

There is now a better emphasis on accountability throughout the school. Increasing the frequency of checks made on pupils’ progress to be half termly will improve your capacity to intervene rapidly to support the progress of specific groups and individuals. You have set demanding targets for pupils’ attainment in each year, and these higher expectations are reinforced with rigorous performance management processes, with clear targets set for all teachers around the progress that pupils will make.

p.2

Main findings

Unusually, the progress made by pupils eligible for the pupil premium was better than that of other pupils at the end of Key Stage 2 last year. I am pleased that you are well aware of the need to monitor this constantly to ensure that no gap opens, as achievement rises in the future.

p.2

Main findings

Phonics (the sounds associated with letters and groups of letters) is a priority throughout the school in order to support necessary improvements in reading and in writing. There are currently several staff who play a part in ensuring its quality, but no one teacher has overall responsibility for ensuring that it is taught to a consistently high standard. This could reduce the efficiency of the monitoring of the quality of teaching in this important area. Your co-headteacher arrangement has the advantage of enabling a flexible response to steering improvement, and you both seem quite clear about who does what. However, responsibilities need to be more clearly defined for the benefit of staff, and to strengthen your accountability to governors. For example, you both clearly recognise the vital importance of good teaching in bringing about the improvements necessary, and you are supporting the development of the quality of teaching

p.2

Main findings

effectively, but it isn’t clear who is responsible for particular aspects of this. Neither is your sense of what ‘good teaching’ will look like in the school communicated coherently. Your plans for you and your staff to undertake a series of visits to good and outstanding schools will assist you in establishing a clear and common understanding of this. You currently have no fruitful links with any teaching schools and you have agreed to explore this source of support. Governors are also keen to develop links with other schools whose governors have well-developed systems of monitoring and evaluation, and to share good practice in holding you and other staff to account for delivering high standards.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

Support from the local authority has previously been very ‘light touch’. Since the previous inspection this has been limited to some useful support for the writing of your development plan. There are indications that the local authority will now begin to work more closely with you, identifying appropriate schools for you to visit to see good and outstanding practice, and providing support to enable governors to offer high levels of challenge and support in the future. There is also the promise of support with developments in teaching and learning in English and mathematics.

p.3

External support

The diocese is currently offering useful leadership support via their programme for new headteachers. This involves visiting a good school and working with an experienced colleague. They have agreed to look for other opportunities for you and your staff to see innovative and highly effective practice elsewhere, possibly working with a local training school.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for West Sussex and the Director of Education for the Diocese of Chichester.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion