Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Nov 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ian Richardson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ian Richardson

  • Postcode verified

    S70 6JL

Page 2 of 3
Page 2 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+41Positivemore positive than 45% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedeffectivelyimprovingclear
Criticismconcern

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings263w0
  • Leadership623w+41

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
886
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 29%Leadership 68%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Mrs J Brown and Mr L McClure Executive Headteacher and Head of School Shawlands Primary School Shaw Street Barnsley South Yorkshire S70 6JL

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 7 November 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in July 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with the executive headteacher and head of school, the Chair of the Governing Body and three governors, a representative of the local authority and three middle leaders from the school staff. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s improvement plan were evaluated.

p.1

Context

At the time of the last Ofsted inspection the headteacher was still in post but not present in the school. The deputy headteacher had represented the school during the inspection and was appointed head of school in September 2013. Simultaneously the governing body appointed as executive headteacher a local leader of education, as recommended by the local authority, who had been working with the school to CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566 857 Direct F 01695 729 320 Direct email : jkinsman@cfbt.com make improvements. The senior leaders have restructured the staff to focus on improvements which were also identified in the inspection report.

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The senior leaders in the school have taken the judgements of the Ofsted report as defining the areas for improvement necessary in the school. Their approach has been systematic and energetic. Working closely with the local authority, senior leaders have agreed an improvement plan that is detailed and covers all the issues identified as areas for improvement by the inspection. The senior leaders have then taken the agreed improvement plan and broken it down into weekly targets that allow them to track progress closely. This tracking document is shared with the staff and communicated to parents through a display in the entrance hall of the school using language appropriate to the audience. Senior leaders, teachers, local authority staff and governors monitor improvements using the tracking document.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Much of the work is focused on improving systems and processes in the school. As a precursor to taking action, the senior leaders have undertaken audits in collaboration with local authority staff. For example, an audit of provision and standards in literacy led senior leaders to appoint a literacy coordinator who leads a team in which individuals take responsibility for leading work on each of writing, reading, spelling and phonics. The local authority school evaluation officer supports this team.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

There is clear evidence of close collaboration between the school's leaders and the local authority. This shows itself in the joint planning for improvement and the range of support given to the school. This support is extensive and well-recorded, covering such areas as planning, joint lesson observation, learning walks, performance management activities, contributions to the school improvement strategic group, review of phonics, teaching and learning review days. The relationship of the school and the local authority is close, productive and well-managed. The local authority had identified the school as a matter of concern before the inspection by Ofsted and had put in place a range of support, not least the services of a local leader in education who is now executive headteacher. The school leaders and the local authority are monitoring and collecting data on improvements in each of the areas identified by Ofsted as in need of improvement. Communications between partners

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

are much in evidence and are seen to be effective.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The governing body is now making significant contributions to improvements in the school by the increased challenge they are providing to the school's leadership. The governing body has been reorganised with a new Chair and vice-chair and the majority of governors are new to the governing body of the school. They have received training on key areas of understanding such as the analysis of performance data and the interpretation of RAISEonline data. Having recognised there were problems with the performance of the school the governors initiated a self-review process prior to the inspection. This was carried out with the support of the local authority and they identified what they needed to do to improve their own performance and contribute to the improvement of the school. As a consequence governors produced a development plan and are now better equipped to be critical friends to the school. They recognise the improvement to teaching and learning

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

brought about by improved systems and more effective monitoring. They welcome the current focus on the performance of individuals and groups of pupils in order to raise standards more effectively. Governors attribute much of the improvement to the effectiveness of the school's leadership.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, and the Director of Children’s Services for Barnsley. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion