Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Stokes Wood Primary School
Summary
Michael Miller (lead), Carol Deakin, Stewart Gale
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
7 Nov 2013
- Inspectors verified
Carol Deakin, Michael Miller, Stewart Gale
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Postcode verified
LE3 9BX
- Name on report verified
Stokes Wood Primary School
- URN verified
120038
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.8
- Consistently good teaching and skilful assessment in the Nursery and Reception classes enable children to make good progress. p.4
- Many lessons promote well the pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development, and excellent opportunity was taken in a Year 2 art lesson to help pupils to think about the quality of light. p.6
- The school’s strong approach to ensuring equality for all is shown in the ways it uses the pupil premium to focus staff and resources on providing well-planned support from teachers and support staff. p.4
- The school’s self-evaluation is accurate and focused well on moving it from good to outstanding. p.6
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.8
- Not enough teaching is outstanding; some still leaves insufficient time for pupils to discuss and reflect on their learning. p.1
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.8
- However, their attainment in writing, and in the new English grammar, punctuation and spelling test, is not yet as strong as their attainment in reading and mathematics. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Strengthen the leadership and management of the school and the monitoring of teaching and pupils’ progress, by helping the school’s less-experienced subject and key stage leaders to develop fully the skills they need to support senior leaders in checking the school’s work and raise pupils’ achievement further. p.3
- Build on the school’s good partnership with parents by working with families to ensure fewer absences and increased punctuality to school, thus promoting the value of education and enhancing the pupils’ opportunities to make progress. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,798
- about usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Stokes Wood Primary School Blackett Avenue, , Leicester, LE3 9BX
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a good school. Given their individual starting points when they join the school, most pupils make good progress and achieve well. The school is particularly successful in the promotion of a love of reading and enabling pupils to develop this important skill. Pupils’ good attitudes to learning are fostered particularly well, right across the school. Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage make increasingly good progress in all areas of their learning and development. Most teaching is good, and pupils learn well within a stimulating environment. Staff see pupils’ potential to achieve well; an atmosphere of mutual respect is encouraged. Good leadership from senior leaders and the governing body results from an accurate assessment of the school’s effectiveness and a clear focus on improving pupils’ progress and the quality of teaching. The school has proved particularly successful in enabling those pupils who qualify for additional
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
government funding to make good progress. Discussions with parents and those who responded to the Parent View survey show that almost all appreciate that their children are happy and safe in school. The school is regarded highly by its families because of its focus on pupils’ personal as well as their academic development.
p.1
It is not yet an outstanding school because
Not enough teaching is outstanding; some still leaves insufficient time for pupils to discuss and reflect on their learning. Pupils’ standards by Year 6 in writing, including in punctuation, grammar and spelling, are not as high as those they achieve in reading and mathematics. The school has not yet fully extended its work on pupils’ vocabulary, and linked work on letters and sounds, to pupils in Years 5 and 6. A few less-experienced subject and key stage leaders are still developing their management skills, particularly in the use of progress data and the monitoring of teaching. Attendance is improving, but the school is still establishing a track record of at least average attendance and there remain some concerns about punctuality. The school knows it still has work to do to persuade a number of families of the value and importance of education.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors observed 27 lessons and all 13 class teachers. Five lessons were seen jointly with the headteacher. In addition, the work of teaching assistants, working with individuals and small groups of pupils who experience difficulty with their learning, was also observed. Daily registration times were observed and inspectors attended an assembly. In addition, inspectors undertook short observations of what pupils did in lessons and around the school to observe its life and pupils at work. The team also undertook a scrutiny of samples of pupils’ work, selected at random by inspectors. They also heard a sample of pupils from Years 2 and 6 read. During the inspection, meetings were held with groups of pupils selected at random by the lead inspector. In addition, many informal opportunities were taken to talk with pupils. Inspectors looked at a wide range of school documents including: development plans, policies,
p.2
Information about this inspection
self-evaluation reports, various monitoring files, reports on the school by the local authority, safeguarding and curriculum materials, information provided for families, and governing body documents. The school’s data and assessment records for the tracking of pupils’ progress were scrutinised. Discussions were held with the headteacher, other members of the senior leadership team, subject and key stage coordinators, class teachers, learning support staff, administrative staff, members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority. The 36 responses to the online questionnaire, Parent View, were taken into consideration. The 32 responses to the questionnaire for school staff were also taken into account.
p.2
Inspection team
Michael Miller, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Stewart Gale Additional Inspector Carol Deakin Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
This school is larger than the average-sized primary school. Most pupils continue their education at the school from the Early Years Foundation Stage until they leave at the end of Year 6. The large majority of the pupils come from White British backgrounds. The largest minority heritage group is of Asian or Asian British pupils. A few come from various other backgrounds. Most pupils speak English as their first language. The proportion who speak English as an additional language is average; few are at an early stage of English language development. The proportion of pupils for whom the school receives the pupil premium (additional funding for particular groups, including those known to be eligible for free school meals) is above average. The proportion of disabled pupils or those who have special educational needs supported at school action is well-above average. The proportion supported at school action plus or with a
p.3
Information about this school
statement of special educational needs is also well-above average. Most pupils receiving additional support have behavioural, emotional and social difficulties, moderate learning difficulty, speech, language and communication needs and/or experience specific learning difficulty. Others experience a range of other difficulties or disabilities. The headteacher is a member of the City Primary Headteachers’ Group. She is a representative on its steering committees with responsibility for promoting physical education across Leicester City and the development of ‘nurture groups’ across the authority. The governing body manages two breakfast clubs each day during term time, solely for pupils at the school. The first is to promote the development of pupils’ reading and the second involves more traditional childcare at the start of each school day; neither requires separate registration. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations
p.3
Information about this school
for the attainment and progress of pupils by the end of Year 6.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Ensure the momentum for improving teaching and pupils’ achievement is maintained across all year groups, particularly in writing, spelling, grammar and punctuation by: ensuring pupils have the maximum possible time to discuss and reflect on their learning, both together and with their teachers extending the opportunities for pupils to develop and enrich their vocabulary so they can express themselves consistently well and with confidence both verbally and in writing extending the opportunities for pupils to use and apply their writing skills across a wider range of subjects, and through situations which relate directly to their everyday lives making improved use of the good work on letters and sound (phonics) and related vocabulary work now being extended into Years 5 and 6 in order to help enrich pupils’ writing.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Strengthen the leadership and management of the school and the monitoring of teaching and pupils’ progress, by helping the school’s less-experienced subject and key stage leaders to develop fully the skills they need to support senior leaders in checking the school’s work and raise pupils’ achievement further.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Build on the school’s good partnership with parents by working with families to ensure fewer absences and increased punctuality to school, thus promoting the value of education and enhancing the pupils’ opportunities to make progress.
p.3
The achievement of pupils is good
Most children enter the Early Years Foundation Stage with levels of skills, knowledge and understanding well below those expected for their age. Children are mainly some 18 to 20 months below the levels expected nationally when they join the Nursery. Many children entering the Reception classes have experienced no Nursery education and their overall development is, typically, some 14 to 18 months below that expected of children nationally.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Consistently good teaching and skilful assessment in the Nursery and Reception classes enable children to make good progress. Consequently, by the time children leave the Reception classes, the large majority have gained a firm foundation for their future progress in Key Stage 1.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
During Key Stages 1 and 2, pupils continue to progress well. By the time they leave, at the end of Year 6, most pupils are attaining average standards. However, their attainment in writing, and in the new English grammar, punctuation and spelling test, is not yet as strong as their attainment in reading and mathematics.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Improving pupils’ writing skills remains an important target for the school. However, standards by the end of Year 6 have risen over the last three years from below average to average in the national tests. There is still work to do in this aspect of the pupils’ literacy work, but the school is now focusing more sharply on extending into Years 5 and 6 the good work on letters and sounds (phonics) seen in earlier year groups. However, this has not yet gone far enough in improving the pupils’ writing skills, or in developing their vocabulary for writing.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Reading is promoted well throughout the school. The library, although it has to be in removable cabinets in the hall, is well organised and used effectively. Pupils’ displays about their reading work, from designs for bookmarks to book reviews, illustrate how important reading is to the pupils and the ways good reading skills enhance their attitudes to learning.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
In the Year 1 phonics screening check in 2013, the proportion of pupils gaining and exceeding the expected minimum mark was average. Given the pupils’ skills two or three years earlier, when they first joined the school, this represents particularly good and improving progress.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
School data show many of the nearly 40% of pupils who are eligible for additional government funding (pupil premium) are also disabled or have special educational needs. These pupils achieve well given their individual starting points.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
In summer 2013, pupils eligible for the pupil premium were only just over a term behind both their classmates and all pupils nationally, although between two to three terms behind in writing, grammar, punctuation and spelling.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Over the last three years, the proportion of pupils eligible for the pupil premium who did not gain the nationally expected levels in English and mathematics has been halved. While there are relatively few higher-attaining pupils among this group, the school enables more-able pupils to make good progress and few fail to gain their predicted levels by Year 6.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
The school’s strong approach to ensuring equality for all is shown in the ways it uses the pupil premium to focus staff and resources on providing well-planned support from teachers and support staff. This ensures good planning to meet individual pupils’ specific needs. The school has developed its own ‘nurture group’, which provides specialist support for the wide range of pupils who find learning more difficult and those for whom English is an additional language. The latter pupils, in particular, make good progress and achieve well.
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
Pupils’ achievement is enhanced further through the school’s continued promotion of the 2012 Olympic heritage. In support of this, the school is making particularly good use of the new primary school sports funding, not only to employ experienced, specialist sports coaches and a sports graduate, but also to promote sports and healthy activities, such as golf and street dance. Such pursuits are also proving highly successful in engaging those pupils who show particularly challenging behaviour.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Teaching is typically good. Teachers are clear about what they want pupils to learn. Teachers and their assistants alike develop very positive working relationships with the pupils. This underpins effectively the pupils’ good attitudes to learning. The focus on pupils’ personal as well as academic progress is a strength and was highlighted by parents when talking with inspectors.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Most teachers show that they are good at asking questions of the pupils, both to check understanding and provide an extra element of challenge in a lesson. The pupils show that they are keen to rise to such challenges. Marking is very regular and oral feedback helpful; pupils say this enables them to understand their next steps in learning and what to improve.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Teachers across the school have worked hard to improve the quality of their teaching of writing, including pupils’ work on English punctuation, spelling and grammar. A scrutiny of pupils’ work shows that marking is now focusing particularly well on this aspect of literacy, but the school accepts the impact of this has still to be seen – for example, in the 2014 national tests.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Teachers and their assistants show they are open to the sharing of good practice. This is helping to bring about further improvements in both reading and writing. The methodical practice in the teaching of letters and sounds, which is well-established in earlier year groups, is only now being extended fully into Years 5 and 6 to help improve further individual pupils’ reading where their skills are weaker, extend their creative vocabulary and enrich their writing.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Some impressive teaching was seen across the school. For example, in a Year 5 and 6 English lesson pupils were using their creative imagination to very good effect in writing ‘spoof’ explanations. Typical was pupils’ explanation of how a stereo works – because there are ‘really fairies in each speaker’. Pupils of all abilities rose well to the challenge of this writing task, and had great fun while doing so.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
Where teaching requires improvement, it is often because teachers or teaching assistants simply talk too much at the pupils. This limits the time pupils have to undertake the work planned for the lesson and their opportunities to discuss and reflect on their work and make good progress. There were also missed opportunities to encourage the pupils to extend their vocabulary to enrich their writing or make use of the potential for writing across subjects other than English.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
The use of assessments to help plan teaching and learning is particularly good in the Early Years Foundation Stage. Daily observations by teachers and assistants are collated in the children’s ‘Learning Journey’ achievement records. These provide a clear picture of children’s progress and development across all aspects of learning and development.
p.5
The quality of teaching is good
The Early Years Foundation Stage staff also make good use of links with other local providers, such as child-minders and a local children’s centre. Home visits help staff to make important assessments of the children before they start in the Nursery or Reception classes; this enables children to start school with confidence. Suitably high expectations of the children are set in both the Nursery and Reception Years. Routines and opportunities are established well at this stage.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
An important strength of the school is its welcoming and supportive environment. It is a very friendly community within which pupils work and play in safety and confidence. The responses to Parent View help confirm that behaviour and pupils’ attitudes to learning are typically good. Most pupils show persistence and concentration when learning and cooperate well.
p.6
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Pupils take on responsibility readily. They show a good awareness of the implications and consequences of the different types of bullying; their moral and social development is good. Discussions with parents and pupils show that they trust the staff. The foundations for pupils’ good attitudes are being laid securely from the day they start in the Nursery or Reception Years.
p.6
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
The school has a number of pupils who find it difficult to manage their own behaviour consistently well throughout a school day. However, behaviour is managed uniformly well across the school. Pupils are helped to control themselves and not disrupt learning. They are encouraged and enabled to become involved actively in school life.
p.6
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Attendance has improved to broadly average, but there is still some lateness each morning. School data show persistent absences and lateness are linked largely to only a relatively few families. The school has good working relationships with almost all of its families, but its improvement planning recognises there is more to be done with some to promote the value of the education it provides in enabling pupils to make progress.
p.6
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Many lessons promote well the pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development, and excellent opportunity was taken in a Year 2 art lesson to help pupils to think about the quality of light. Discussions with pupils showed they appreciated the links being made with their science work. They also showed the depth of their spiritual understanding when they told the inspector: ‘We are not just drawing; we are not just painting … we are creating art!’
p.6
The leadership and management are good
Leaders, at all levels, do make important differences to pupils’ lives and achievement. Discussions with families at the school gate confirm this often extends to whole families. The school has gained a justifiably good reputation within its local community for advancing pupils’ personal and academic achievement, particularly because of the approachability of staff.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
The steady and secure progress pupils make, in both their personal and academic development, reflects the good teamwork among staff and a good capacity for further improvement. The school’s self-evaluation is accurate and focused well on moving it from good to outstanding.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
Shared lesson observations show that the headteacher evaluates accurately the quality of teaching. Subject and key stage coordinators are all full-time class teachers; some, relatively new to their posts, are still developing the skills necessary to support the headteacher in the monitoring of teaching and the analysis and evaluation of performance data so they can have more impact on raising pupils’ achievement.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
The deputy headteacher, the Early Years Foundation Stage coordinator and the advanced skills teacher have the experience to assess accurately the quality of teaching and learning. Together with the headteacher, they set a good example for less-experienced staff. Discussions with staff show they are open to the sharing of good practice and new ideas.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
Across the school, teachers have developed a good range of subjects and topics which make pupils’ learning interesting. Learning is complemented further by a programme of extra- curricular activities which broaden and enhance well pupils’ experiences.
p.7
The leadership and management are good
The school has well-established links with its local authority, which have benefited the school well. Further support is planned to help subject and key stage leaders develop their management skills and support the promotion of improved attendance.
p.7
The leadership and management are good
The governance of the school: The governing body both supports and challenges the school well. A number of governors are regular volunteers who work with the pupils. Their commitment helps the governing body to be well informed about the school’s performance and how and why pupils make progress. Governors compare and contrast the school’s performance effectively with others nationally, because they have access to a good range of data on pupils’ progress and attainment. The governing body knows how the pupil premium funding and other funding such as the primary school sports funding is spent. Such funds are being used well not only on additional, specialist staffing to provide extra tuition but also to ensure no pupils are disadvantaged. Together with the headteacher and other senior leaders, the governing body makes sure procedures and policies for safeguarding pupils are in place. Until September 2013, the school operated the local authority’s model policies which gave
p.7
The leadership and management are good
teachers automatic annual salary increases, regardless of performance. The governing body is currently working with the local authority to ensure that in future, promotions are linked specifically to pupils’ progress and school improvement, in line with national guidelines. The governing body ensures that there are systematic checks on the effectiveness of teaching. The school has developed a clear appraisal system through which teachers’ performance management targets are linked closely both to school improvement priorities, national teaching standards and teachers’ requests for professional development.
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.8
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.8
School details
Unique reference number 120038 Local authority Leicester Inspection number 425078
p.9
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.9
School details
Type of school Primary School category Maintained Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 384 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Dawn Chapman Headteacher Jane Gadsby Date of previous school inspection 7 October 2008 Telephone number 0116 2875305 Fax number 0116 2321032 Email address office@stokeswood.leicester.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.9
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.10
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.10
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.10
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.10
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion