Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Nov 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Melanie Knowles

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Melanie Knowles

  • Postcode verified

    RG19 3SR

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+55Positivemore positive than 54% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiverigorousclearimprovedpositiveimproving
Criticismnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
809
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs P Winsor Executive Headteacher Parsons Down Junior School Herons Way Thatcham RG19 3SR

p.1

Junior School

Following my visit to your school on 23 October 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Junior School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in May 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Junior School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Junior School

 review the electronic system for tracking pupils’ progress  include short-term targets for pupils’ progress in the school development plan  adjust the points at which information on pupils’ progress is gathered throughout the academic year so that the governing body can better judge the progress the school is making towards its targets  increase the involvement of the governing body in monitoring the work of the school. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, the head of school and the assistant headteacher to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I also met with the Chair of the Governing Body and a group of pupils. I spoke to a representative of the local authority by telephone. The school improvement plan was evaluated.

p.2

Context

Changes have been made to the leadership structure of the school. A new head of school and two ‘standards leaders’ have been appointed. The ‘standards leaders’ each have responsibility for the learning and progress of two year groups in the school.

p.2

Main findings

The changes in the leadership structure have strengthened the school’s capacity to improve. Management responsibilities are now shared more widely and all leaders understand their role and their accountability. Senior staff have drawn up a comprehensive action plan that is based on rigorous and self-critical evaluation of the school’s current position. The plan has appropriate long-term targets for pupils’ attainment and progress across both schools in the federation. Currently, there are no short-term targets in the plan and so it is not clear what progress the governing body can expect to see at various points during the year.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders have a clear strategy to improve the quality of teaching and are determined to do this quickly. They have increased the rigour of the checks made on the quality of teaching and make sure that teachers receive very clear feedback about any aspects of their work that need to be improved. All staff understand the link between the quality of teaching and pupils’ progress over time.

p.2

Main findings

Procedures to check the progress of pupils have been tightened. The new ‘standards leaders’ work closely with teachers and check that staff make the best use of information about pupils’ progress to plan work that meets the needs of different ability groups. Information on pupils’ progress is gathered regularly, but governors do not receive reports frequently enough to enable them to judge whether the changes that have been made are having an impact on standards.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils are very positive about the changes that have been introduced since September. They particularly like the new ‘good to be green’ behaviour policy and the school’s system of rewards for good work and good conduct.

p.2

Main findings

The review of governance that was recommended at the time of the section 5 inspection is due to take place next month. It is envisaged that there will be a greater role for the governing body in monitoring the work of the school once the review is completed.

p.2

Main findings

HMI will contact the school at the start of the summer term to review progress. Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority is monitoring the school’s progress closely. Since the recent section 5 inspection, the school has joined the ‘improving schools programme’ run by the local authority. This provides enhanced support to the school from advisers and consultants. School leaders have already made good use of the various training courses on offer for teachers and middle leaders.

p.3

External support

The relationship with the partner school in the federation is developing well and teachers now benefit from regular opportunities to work closely with colleagues and share good practice.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for West Berkshire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion