Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Ian Seath
- Postcode verified
NR28 9HZ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 832
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Caroline Brooker Headteacher North Walsham High School Spenser Avenue North Walsham Norfolk NR28 9HZ
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 8 November 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in July 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
School
Ensure that all pupils are challenged and inspired to achieve the highest possible levels in all lessons, and modify the lesson observation system to accurately monitor this Ensure that records of governors’ meetings are sharper at recording and monitoring progress towards targets Ensure that students are given more opportunities to develop skills of independent learning and problem solving to support learning.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I had meetings with you and other senior leaders, representatives of the governing body, and a representative from the local authority. The school improvement and action plans were evaluated, together with recent performance Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9146 Direct email : clare.benson@serco.com data, assessment records and the lesson observation system. A total of seven lessons were visited with you to evaluate learning in mathematics and English at Key Stage 3.
p.1
Main findings
The school now has the provisional results of GCSE examinations for 2013. These show a decline in English, but an improvement for mathematics and science results especially for the significant number of students taking triple science.
p.2
Main findings
The school has put much development into the assessment of students’ attainment and progress. This process is now both systematic and accurate, giving teachers a good view of how individuals and groups are making progress. Often, this information is used to plan lessons so that they are pitched at a high level and all students make the best possible progress. For example in a Year 8 mathematics group, the teacher used questioning to skilfully check learning, following up with short periods of support for those who had not grasped the concept being discussed. This ensured that all students learned well.
p.2
Main findings
In some other lessons, for example English, teachers do not challenge students sufficiently, especially those with lower prior attainment. This means that they do not catch up and so make slow progress. Teachers have undertaken much professional development to improve the quality of teaching. Although it is too soon to be sure of an impact, it is clear that the progress pupils make in Key Stage 3 is improving. Students are slow to develop important skills of independent learning and problem solving because they are not systematically given opportunities to practise them in class. The quality of marking of students’ written work has improved.
p.2
Main findings
You and your colleagues have taken on board the issues identified at the last inspection. You have, rightly, put much effort into the improvement of teaching. Best practice is now shared on a regular and systematic basis. Action plans produced in response to the last inspection are very detailed and comprehensive. You have an accurate view of teaching in terms of the judgements that you award for lesson observations. However the system that is used for this does not always recognise when pupils are not learning at a high enough level so that corrective action can be taken.
p.2
Main findings
Governors support the school well and bring many strengths to their role. The results of the external review of governance recommended at the last inspection have not yet been released. It is clear however that the challenge made to you and your colleagues has improved. Governors have undertaken much training, for example on the interpretation of school performance data. Their role in the performance management of teachers is improving and they have made a start to the process of holding teachers to account for the performance of their students. Governors have reviewed their own performance and have a detailed plan concerning their own training and professional development. Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
Through the local authority’s ‘Norfolk to Good and Great’ programme the school has accessed much support. This has included training for governors. Staff have benefitted from training from the local authority and independent consultants. This has included training to improve assessment and the monitoring of progress.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Norfolk.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion