Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · Further education inspection (CIF)

Bellis Training Limited

Inspected 24 Oct 2013 · published 19 Nov 2013 · URN 50656

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    24 Oct 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Sandra Summers

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Outcomes verified

    Good

  • Overall effectivenesssingle source

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Good

  • Teaching, learning and assessment verified

    Good

  • Name on report verified

    Bellis Training Ltd

  • URN verified

    50656

Page 9 of 10
Page 9 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood
  • OutcomesGood
  • Teaching, learning and assessmentGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+49Positivemore positive than 39% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisehighly effectiveeffectivelyvery wellsuccessfullyclearvery effectivesuccessfulstrengths
Criticismdeclinednot sufficientlynot alwaysat riskinsufficientlylimitedgapsnot effectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings218w+43
  • What needs to improve1875w+48

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,041
shorter than usual (typical 3295)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 33, typical 35
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 8%What needs to improve 69%About the inspection 23%

Full report text

Further Education and Skills inspection report Date published: 19 November 2013 Inspection Number: 429000 URN: 50656

p.1

Summary of key findings for learners

 Learners develop a wide range of very good skills that help them at work and in their personal lives.  Almost all learners achieve their qualifications.  Staff support learners very well and give them good information, advice and guidance to help them stay on their course and plan their future.  Staff prepare learners very well to be successful in the workplace. Employers appreciate learners’ skills and their positive attitudes to work.  Managers and staff have a good understanding of local employment needs and prospects. They work closely with employers to provide a wide range of good work experience opportunities for learners.  Managers and staff are ambitious for their learners and expect them to achieve.

p.1

Summary of key findings for learners

 The number of learners progressing into further learning and employment at the end of their programme has declined over the past three years.  Plans that staff develop for individuals’ progress are not detailed enough to make sure that learners are always stretched and challenged in all their lessons and activities.  Arrangements to monitor and develop the quality of teaching and learning are not sufficiently clearly structured and linked to enable the provider to check standards effectively and to improve performance.

p.1

This inspection: Good-2

Previous inspection: Good-2 Outcomes for learners Good-2 Quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good-2 Effectiveness of leadership and management Good-2

p.1

What does the provider need to do to improve further?

 Immediately begin to share good practice between staff and research good practice externally to improve the planning of learning to ensure that all lessons provide challenge for all learners. Establish regular staff training activities.  Promptly review individual learning plans and ensure that they detail precise and challenging targets which enable staff and learners to measure learners’ progress over time. This should include all of the programme areas of English, mathematics, personal and social development and vocational training. Ensure these detailed targets are regularly reviewed and revised to support learners’ timely progress.  Introduce simplified, systematic and appropriate quality assurance arrangements which provide a clear overview of the quality of teaching and learning. Ensure that these systems accurately and continuously monitor performance and drive improvements. Review their effectiveness and

p.2

What does the provider need to do to improve further?

their efficiency regularly.  Celebrate the strengths and values of the organisation and promote the rich diversity and many achievements of all learners from all backgrounds and starting points. Use this effectively, for example as part of the information on the website, to aid recruitment.  Regularly review the level of qualifications taken by each learner to ensure that the level appropriately meets their needs and that the organisation is using its resources effectively and efficiently to support learners’ progress.

p.2

Inspection judgements

 Outcomes for learners are good. In 2011/12 success rates for learners were high and for some were very high. Success rates in most subject areas declined slightly in 2012/13 but they remained above national averages and significantly above those for organisations within the same provider group. All learners in the current year who have taken the foundation level certificate in personal and employability skills have achieved. The standard of learners’ work is good.  Learners develop very good social and employability skills both through individual and group work in classes, and also within the very good range of work placements. These placements give learners well-structured work experience and, in the best cases, additional work-related training opportunities.  Learners significantly improve their confidence and their personal skills. They appreciate and understand the role that staff from Bellis Training (BT) play in these developments. Many can

p.2

Inspection judgements

describe clearly their improving skills and their growing maturity.  Staff are clear about local economic needs and employment opportunities and they effectively support learners to develop appropriately structured career paths. A significant number of learners have been promoted into supervisory and management roles. One learner who started on a foundation programme has been offered a university place.  In 2010/11 the progression rate of learners into further education and training or work was good but subsequently this declined, and in 2012/13 only just over half of the learners progressed successfully. Staff have taken actions to improve this. Of the 19 learners who have left the programme in the current year so far, three-quarters have progressed successfully.  Some groups of learners achieve less well than others, but the numbers in these groups are low. In 2012/13 learners with learning difficulties and/or disabilities (LDD) achieved less well than

p.2

Inspection judgements

others. Since then, the provider has improved staff understanding of disability through training programmes, and of the five learners with LDD in the current year three have progressed successfully and two remain on programme.  Learners’ attendance in 2012/13 needed improvement. Staff now intervene and respond to learners’ absence immediately and this raised profile has significantly improved attendance rates. Staff monitor learners’ punctuality daily and require them to make up any lost time in their breaks. However the impact of this is not recorded and it is not possible to monitor improvements.

p.3

Inspection judgements

The quality of teaching, learning and assessment Good

p.3

Inspection judgements

 Teaching, learning and assessment are good. Teaching and individual support are particularly effective in significantly developing learners’ personal, social and employability skills. Learners produce high standards of work and successfully achieve a wide range of qualifications that improve their confidence and motivation.  Learners make very good progress in lessons that develop their personal, social and employability skills. In these lessons learning is challenging and teachers provide a wide variety of activities which are particularly successful in developing learners’ skills. For example, in a communications lesson, learners followed instructions to make a shape from a variety of smaller shapes demonstrating how people interpret information in different ways and how body language affects this. Learners produce high standards of work in these lessons and enjoy their learning.  Lessons and qualifications extend learners understanding of equality and diversity well. In one

p.3

Inspection judgements

lesson, an icebreaker activity on religious festivals further extended learners’ understanding of cultural differences. Learners generally have a good understanding of equality and diversity from a thorough induction, discussions in the workplace and through the qualifications that they are studying.  Tutors in vocational lessons do not always challenge learners sufficiently. Learning is mostly limited to the level of the qualification and more able learners are not adequately stretched or have their understanding tested. Tutors do not always plan and monitor learners’ individual learning pathways sufficiently well to ensure that they are making enough progress in relation to their potential in each lesson or on their overall learning programmes.  Information, advice and guidance are very good in identifying the personal support needs of individual learners. Staff work closely with learners to ensure that they are not experiencing any

p.3

Inspection judgements

difficulties. A wide range of learning modules including those relating to drug and alcohol misuse is particularly helpful in providing learners with general advice on healthy lifestyles. Specific guidance and personal support are highly effective in helping learners with particular problems; for example, housing, criminal records and acceptable behaviours. BT makes good use of links with external agencies.  Learners’ initial assessments for English and mathematics are comprehensive. In the majority of cases staff use this information well to plan appropriate qualification levels for learners. Where appropriate, some learners have completed a lower level of qualification to boost their confidence and they are then quickly moved onto a more challenging level of work. However, in a minority of cases staff have not planned this effectively and these learners complete multiple qualifications in very short periods of time; for example completing two levels within two weeks

p.3

Inspection judgements

and a third level within a month. This number of tests can appear daunting and impedes the speed of their progress to a higher level.  Staff match learners to appropriate work experience very effectively. They take great care to ensure that the placements meet learners’ needs and interests well. Learners may have more than one placement where they are able to try different jobs and, through discussion with staff, decide which career would suit them best. Tutors, assessors and employers work closely with learners to ensure that they learn a wide range of skills while in the work place. Many learners gain employment from their work experience and some have progressed onto supervisory and management roles.

p.3

Inspection judgements

The effectiveness of leadership and management Good

p.4

Inspection judgements

 Leadership and management are good. Managers have high expectations for learners’ achievements and are fully aware of the barriers they face. Strategic priorities are clear and the vision for learners and the future of the company is regularly communicated to staff through a series of twice monthly team meetings. Managers have developed the business well to meet local and national needs, particularly for learners with difficulties or those who are at risk of dropping out of education or training. Managers know their learners well and are committed to providing highly effective employment opportunities and training to improve their life choices.  The managing director robustly manages assessor performance, checking learner progress on a weekly basis. Assessors are set challenging targets for learner recruitment, retention and achievement and while recruitment remains a priority risk for BT, retention and achievement

p.4

Inspection judgements

targets have been met or exceeded. Internal verification meets and, in some areas, exceeds awarding body standards.  Quality monitoring and action planning for teaching and learning require improvement. Observation records of teaching and learning clearly identify areas for improvement. All teachers are graded by staff from the provider and moderated externally. Records are detailed; however grading is often over generous. Written feedback to teachers following observation is comprehensive but actions for improvement or opportunities for sharing best practice are not identified on improvement plans. Staff record learners’ views after each lesson and take prompt action to address any learning needs identified at the following lesson.  The self-assessment report satisfactorily identifies key strengths, areas for development and actions for improvement. However, the wide range of information managers gather and the

p.4

Inspection judgements

numerous quality improvement action plans, including staff appraisal and training needs analysis, do not provide a clear overview of standards or measurement of improvement in teaching, learning and assessment. Some issues remain unresolved from the previous inspection; for example, the insufficiently clear target setting in learning plans.  Partnerships with other providers and network groups are very effective and provide benchmarking and external moderation for observations of teaching, learning and assessment, health and safety checks and updating opportunities for local education and training issues and themes.  Employer engagement is highly effective and the provider has developed very good employer links providing a wide range of work placements to support learning programmes. Employers highly value the readiness for employment that learners demonstrate throughout their work experience programmes; they commend, for example, their standard of dress, punctuality,

p.4

Inspection judgements

commitment and confidence.  Managers plan programmes well to include employability, personal and social development and vocational aspects. BT analyses comprehensively the work roles available with each employer and shows how they relate to the qualification outcomes. This helps learners choose work placements and plan their assessments effectively. Some learners are able to take advantage of training qualifications employers provide in the work place. For example, learners in a large national pub chain are able to complete an appropriate and nationally recognised qualification and an on-line company induction programme in addition to their main qualification.  Equality and diversity are promoted effectively and learners receive good equality and diversity training. Learners understand all legal equality and diversity themes and employers are aware of their legal responsibilities. Staff have had some equality training and new staff are provided with

p.4

Inspection judgements

information at induction. Qualification achievement is high across all groups and managers have identified a priority to improve the ratio of male learners recruited to programmes. Data for equality and diversity are collected but managers do not have a systematic process for analysing any gaps in achievement for particular groups. Marketing material does not sufficiently reflect or celebrate the rich diversity, many achievements and accomplishments of learners or the very good support available to help them succeed.  The provider meets its statutory duty for safeguarding learners; a named safeguarding officer is responsible for training staff and developing safeguarding learning materials. The safeguarding policy is clear and action to improve risk assessment of learners is planned. BT provides employers with comprehensive and clear material outlining their safeguarding responsibilities before learners start their placement, and the company offers to provide appropriate training.

p.5

Inspection judgements

Learners’ knowledge of health and safety and safeguarding is good.

p.5

performance:

1: Outstanding 2: Good 3: Requires improvement 4: Inadequate

p.6

Overall

The quality of teaching, learning and assessment 2 2 2

p.6

Overall

The effectiveness of leadership and management 2 2 2

p.6

Provider details

Type of provider Independent learning provider

p.7

full contract year

Principal/CEO Liz Sheppard Date of previous inspection October 2010 Website address www.bellistraining.co.uk

p.7

programme level

Level 1 or below Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 and above

p.7

(excluding apprenticeships)

Full-time 16 N/A 2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Part-time 0 N/A 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Number of traineeships 16-19 19+ Total N/A N/A N/A

p.7

Apprenticeship level and age

Intermediate Advanced Higher 16-18 19+ 16-18 19+ 16-18 19+ N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Number of learners aged 14-16 N/A Full-time N/A Part-time N/A Number of community learners N/A Number of employability learners N/A Funding received from Education Funding Agency (EFA)

p.7

Contextual information

BT was formed in 1984 and became a limited company in 2004. At the time of the last inspection over half of the learners were on apprenticeship programmes. As a result of recent funding changes the provider has become part of a consortium and continues to deliver these programmes as a subcontractor. These learners were not part of this inspection. The provider has a direct contract from the Education Funding Agency to deliver Study Programmes, mostly at foundation level. The programme is based at the main office in Hockley and a small centre in Chelmsley Wood, Solihull and all learners have work experience. The majority of learners come from areas with a high index of multiple deprivation.

p.8

Information about this inspection

Three additional inspectors, assisted by the managing director as nominee, carried out the inspection with short notice. Inspectors took account of the provider’s most recent self-assessment report and development plans, and the previous inspection report. Inspectors also used data on learners’ achievements over the last three years to help them make judgements. Inspectors used group and individual interviews, telephone calls and online questionnaires to gather the views of learners and employers; these views are reflected throughout the report. They observed learning sessions, assessments and progress reviews. Inspectors looked at the quality of teaching, learning and assessment across all of the provision and graded the sector subject area in the report above.

p.8

Grade Judgement

Detailed grade characteristics can be viewed in the Handbook for the inspection of further education and skills 2012, Part 2:

p.9

Grade Judgement

http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/handbook-for-inspection-of-further-education-and-skills- september-2012

p.9

Grade Judgement

guidance ‘Raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted’, which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

Grade Judgement

Learner View is a new website where learners can tell Ofsted what they think about their college or provider. They can also see what other learners think about them too.

p.9

Grade Judgement

To find out more go to www.learnerview.ofsted.gov.uk achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection.

p.9

Grade Judgement

If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and provider inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

Grade Judgement

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion