Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Janet Pearce
- Postcode verified
GU25 4DS
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 1,002
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Graham Bollands Headteacher St Ann's Heath Junior School Sandhills Lane Virginia Water Surrey GU25 4DS
p.1
Junior School
Following my visit to your school on 18 October 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Junior School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in July 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Junior School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
Junior School
ensure that senior leaders have a clear plan indicating how they will follow up any teaching that is less than good.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you, other senior leaders and three members of the Governing Body, including the Chair and Vice-Chair of Governors, to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I spoke to a representative of the local authority on the telephone. The school improvement plan was evaluated. I went on a tour of the school to visit all classes. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com
p.1
Context
Since the section 5 inspection in July one member of staff has left the school. The subject leader for mathematics returned from maternity leave at the beginning of term. Two teaching assistants have been appointed. The Vice-Chair of the Governing Body at the time of the previous inspection has now been elected as Chair of Governors.
p.2
Main findings
Following the inspection that took place in July, school leaders have taken prompt action to improve the teaching of mathematics. The school action plan is focused on what needs to be improved and leadership roles and responsibilities have been precisely restructured to focus on the key priorities. Teachers have performance management targets based on the progress their pupils make in mathematics. However, the steps that leaders will take to follow up teaching that still requires improvement are not clear.
p.2
Main findings
The deputy headteacher is now responsible for improving the attainment and progress of pupils who need extra help, including pupils with special educational needs and those who are eligible for free school meals. The subject leader for mathematics is taking urgent action to improve teaching and achievement in mathematics. With careful consideration and advice from the local authority advisory team, senior leaders have wisely taken the decision to restructure teaching groups in mathematics.
p.2
Main findings
Teachers now work in subject teams for English and mathematics across the year groups. In this way they can plan together, share good practice and take more responsibility for their areas. Short-, medium- and long-term lesson plans are appropriately detailed: teachers are also introducing mathematical concepts into other subjects and topic work. School leaders are able to provide sound evidence that pupils of all abilities are already benefiting from working in their new groups: more-able pupils benefit from greater challenges and having to provide verbal explanations of their mathematical reasoning. Less able pupils are developing better approaches to solving mathematical problems, by working alongside more confident pupils.
p.2
Main findings
School leaders are making sure that there is a sharper focus on ensuring that programmes of extra help are properly suited to pupils’ needs. For example, the subject leader for mathematics is teaching a programme of additional lessons for a targeted group of Year 6 pupils who need extra support with word problems in mathematics. School leaders shrewdly raised the profile of mathematics across the whole school. A mathematics magician, clown and theatre group inspired pupils and parents in performances and workshops this term. The exciting and positive impact of this event is visible around the school. In each classroom there are inspiring working walls for mathematics, showing photographs of good work, mathematics achievements and helpful examples of techniques for pupils to use. Pupils are now justly rewarded with ‘special mentions’ for progress in mathematics.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders have rightly acknowledged that marking needs to improve. There is a clear plan in place to make sure that teachers mark pupils’ independent mathematics work thoroughly, giving precise targets and areas to improve. Pupils are then expected to respond to their teachers’ comments and improve their work. Senior leaders have also correctly identified that not all classrooms have enough resources to support mathematics, so they are ensuring that all rooms are supplied with the right equipment.
p.3
Main findings
Governors have restructured their committees to streamline their roles and ensure that they are focused on the areas for improvement. Governors are more involved in the day-to-day work of the school: they provide regular updates at staff meetings and visit lessons more frequently. They are also in the process of carefully evaluating their skills and expertise in order to identify any training needs.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The local authority had identified the school as needing support in 2011 when pupils’ progress raised some concerns. Since the section 5 inspection the school has become a high priority. The school leadership partner works closely with school leaders, ensuring that pupil progress meetings are challenging and that the school leaders bring about rapid and sustained improvement. The local authority advisors have jointly observed teaching with school leaders and have validated their judgements. The local authority has ensured that high quality advisory support for mathematics is in place and will continue. The school is part of a local partnership of schools, which provides useful opportunities for sharing good practice.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Surrey.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion