Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Nov 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Andrew Redpath

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Andrew Redpath

  • Postcode verified

    GU14 6JU

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+76Very positivemore positive than 76% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedeffectivelyenjoyproud

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings435w+76
  • What needs to improve81w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
506
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 84%What needs to improve 16%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs A Bagley Headteacher The Linden Education Centre Queens Road Farnborough Hampshire GU14 6JU

p.1

alternative provision

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 9 and 10 October to look at the school’s use of alternative provision. During the visit I met with the personal development and inclusion manager who coordinates the alternative provision, examined a range of documents and met with some students. I also visited the following providers that your students attend: Explore Activity Centre, Skillways Vocational Workshops, Maximus Gym and Martial Arts Centre, and Releasing Potential.

p.1

alternative provision

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

alternative provision

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The centre has used its local connections very effectively to set up a broad range of off-site provision in a relatively short period of time.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Off-site provision is carefully selected to meet students’ individual needs and interests. Students are prepared well for their placements through prior meetings with staff and by making visits.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Staff who work in the off-site provision are appropriately qualified in their particular fields and establish good relationships with students. As a result students enjoy attending and are proud of their achievements. They particularly appreciate how some of the activities have improved their self- confidence. In the words of one, ‘It has helped me to push myself and to give things a go.’

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Providers report that they have good communication with the school and that any problems that might arise are resolved quickly. They give regular feedback on students’ progress, often verbally.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 The use of off-site provision is timetabled to make sure that all students are provided with a balanced curriculum which leads to a broad range of suitable qualifications, including GCSE in both English and mathematics. Approximately two thirds of Year 11 students who attended off-site provision last year gained GCSE passes in English and mathematics, with the remainder gaining qualifications in the functional skills of literacy and numeracy.

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 Evidence from the school shows that as a result of attending off-site provision, several students have improved their attitude to learning. Almost all students who left in 2012 progressed to future training, study or employment, linked to the work-related qualifications and improved personal skills they gained through attending off-site provision.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 setting targets for students’ personal development, which could be used to measure students’ progress and to help evaluate the effectiveness of off- site provision

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 making sure that all off-site providers get sufficient information about students’ individual needs and abilities prior to attendance

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 pulling together into one comprehensive record the various checks on the health and safety and the suitability of accommodation of off-site providers

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 monitoring the quality of learning at off-site provision more formally through written reports.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion