Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 12 Nov 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Janet Pearce

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Janet Pearce

  • Postcode verified

    GU1 2SG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 41% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiverigorouspositiveambitiousconfidentlyeffectivelypreciselyindependent
Criticismweakinsufficienttoo manylowernot clearlynot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,043
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Louisa Dormer Headteacher Bushy Hill Junior School Sheeplands Avenue Merrow Guildford GU1 2SG

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 15 October 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in July 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School

 strengthen all senior and middle leaders’ skills in leading and monitoring improvements in the teaching of mathematics, reading and writing  implement an appropriate phonics programme as soon as possible.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, members of the Governing Body and two representatives of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan and monitoring documents were evaluated. I met staff and went on a tour of the school to visit all classes in Years 3, 5 and 6. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Context

Since the section 5 inspection two teachers have left the school. A new coordinator for special educational needs and a newly qualified teacher have been appointed. There have been a number of changes within the Governing Body, including the appointment of a new Chair and Vice-Chair of Governors.

p.2

Main findings

Before the section 5 inspection in July the headteacher had already implemented a more rigorous system for managing teachers’ performance. Swift and effective action has now followed to ensure that teachers’ targets are sufficiently challenging and linked to pupils’ progress. Weak performance has been tackled decisively, resulting in a much greater sense of accountability for all staff. The school’s action plan focuses sharply on the areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection. The plan shows what success will look like and includes ambitious but achievable deadlines for improvements. Nevertheless, the plan does not outline sufficiently clearly how each senior leader will lead and evaluate improvements in teaching and pupils’ progress.

p.2

Main findings

The headteacher is monitoring teachers’ planning more carefully. She has shrewdly identified that lesson planning for mathematics is often over-complicated with too many activities for pupils to complete. Teachers consequently lose sight of the main aim of the lesson and lower attaining pupils and also more-able pupils do not make enough gains in their learning. Senior leaders and an advisor from the local authority are now working together to ensure that mathematics teaching is focused more simply and precisely on what pupils need to learn and practise.

p.2

Main findings

The headteacher has introduced a more rigorous scrutiny of pupils’ progress: formal meetings are being held more frequently to discuss pupils’ results and identify those making insufficient progress. The headteacher has identified that less-able pupils and those pupils eligible for free school meals are not making enough progress to catch up with their peers. As a result, the headteacher has made sure that teachers take more responsibility for recording, tracking and evaluating the achievement of individual pupils in their own classes.

p.2

Main findings

School leaders have sensibly implemented regular handwriting practice, reading and spelling activities. School leaders are in the process of reviewing the range of books available in the school and pupils are encouraged to read every day. During the monitoring inspection visit several pupils were attending extra one-to-one reading sessions to support basic skills and comprehension. However, there is no systematic phonics programme in place to support pupils’ work on letters and sounds. With the support of the local authority, school leaders are currently investigating a range of programmes in order to select the system best suited to pupils’ needs. Teachers are encouraging pupils to settle to independent work more quickly in lessons. They are now spending less time repeating instructions and giving unnecessarily lengthy explanations. ‘Talk to your partner’ is having a noticeably positive impact on pupils’ thinking skills and more pupils participate confidently in

p.2

Main findings

lessons, rather than wait to begin tasks. However, not all teachers ensure that pupils use their time wisely: during the monitoring inspection visit some pupils had completed work but did not know what to do next. These pupils were not in the habit of using the available resources and teachers were not aware that the pace of their learning had slowed.

p.3

Main findings

There are some encouraging signs that teachers are improving pupils’ writing through better marking, in line with the school policy. Some teachers give pupils editing activities and follow-up tasks to improve their work, including punctuation and spelling practice. However, this approach is not consistent across the school. Teachers include ‘next steps’ in their written marking but not all ensure that pupils act promptly upon the advice at the crucial point of learning.

p.3

Main findings

Governors have an astute understanding of the areas for improvement in the school. They have wisely restructured their roles and responsibilities in line with the school action plan. Governors now work more closely with the school on a day-to-day basis. As a result, they ask increasingly challenging questions and insist that school leaders provide reliable proof that new approaches are having a positive impact on teaching and pupils’ achievement.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

Leaders are making good use of the full range of support provided by the local authority. They have formed useful partnerships with other schools, assisting with improvements in teaching and leadership. The headteacher benefits from the school improvement partner’s sound advice and challenge. Local authority specialist advisors have also worked effectively with school leaders to plan improvements in the teaching of reading, writing and mathematics.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Surrey.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion