Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Giffard Park Primary School

Inspected 16 Oct 2013 · published 11 Nov 2013 · URN 110381

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

John Taylor (lead), Christopher Crouch, Michael Buist

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    16 Oct 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Christopher Crouch, John Taylor, Michael Buist

  • Leadership and management AI-checked

    Requires improvement

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    MK14 5PY

  • Name on report verified

    Giffard Park Primary School

  • URN verified

    110381

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2009.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementRequires improvement

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+11Mostly positivemore positive than 45% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingeffectivemake good progressimprovedhighly effectiveexceptionallyenjoyhigh expectations
Criticismnot alwaysinadequateweaknessesinconsistentnot sufficientlyrequires improvementweakserious

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings336w+64
  • What needs to improve1641w+1

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,894
shorter than usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 50, typical 47
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 12%What needs to improve 59%About the inspection 29%

Full report text

School report Giffard Park Primary School Broadway Avenue, Giffard Park, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, MK14 5PY

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Requires improvement 3

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because:

 The gap in attainment for those pupils who are supported through the pupil premium is not closing fast enough.  Teachers do not have high enough expectations of pupils’ learning. More-able pupils are not always given tasks that make them think or work hard enough.  Pupils do not make enough progress, particularly in writing, because the work is not always matched closely enough to their needs.  The progress of pupils with special educational needs is not fast enough.  The marking of pupils’ work does not always provide clear guidance on their next steps in learning.  Information about pupils’ attainment and progress has not been used to swiftly tackle areas of underachievement.  Governors do not provide enough challenge and strategic direction to the school leadership.

p.1

The school has the following strengths:

 Pupils enjoy their lessons in the school. They are good at talking to each other about their work, and helping each other learn.  Children get off to a good start in the Reception classes.  The vast majority of staff and parents and carers are very supportive of the school and its leaders.  The new headteacher is committed to accelerating the rate of school improvement and building on the more recent successes.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 The inspectors observed 20 lessons, five of which were observed jointly with the headteacher and deputy headteacher. Inspectors looked at pupils’ work and heard some of them read.  Meetings were held with pupils, the Chair of the Governing Body and two other members, a representative from the local authority, and other members of staff with specific responsibilities.  There were 62 responses to the online questionnaire (Parent View), and inspectors talked to some parents and carers at the beginning of the school day. The lead inspector also considered one letter received from a parent or carer. Inspectors also took account of 30 responses to the staff questionnaire.  The inspectors observed the school’s work and looked at a number of documents, including the school’s data on pupils’ progress, planning and monitoring documentation and records relating to pupils’ behaviour, attendance, safeguarding and the performance management of teachers.

p.2

Inspection team

John Taylor, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Michael Buist Additional Inspector Christopher Crouch Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 This is a larger than average-sized primary school.  A lower than average proportion of pupils are known to be eligible for the pupil premium, which is additional funding for looked after children and pupils known to be eligible for free school meals.  The majority of pupils are from a White British heritage with the others coming from a range of minority ethnic groups.  The proportion of pupils whose first language is not English is lower than in most schools.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs supported through school action is below average. The proportion supported through school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is above average.  About one in three pupils join the school after the normal admission times or leave before the end of Year 6.  There is a resource base for 12 disabled pupils and those with special educational needs.

p.3

Information about this school

This is for pupils with moderate learning difficulties. These pupils come to the base from across Milton Keynes. It is in a process of phased closure.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.  The pre-school and after-school club that meet at the school are run by external providers and were not part of this inspection.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Increase the proportion of good and outstanding teaching by:  ensuring that all teachers have equally high expectations for what pupils of different abilities can achieve  making more effective use of teaching assistants, by being more specific about the support they are going to provide in lessons  using tracking data more effectively to identify and address the inconsistent progress of different groups of pupils, particularly those who may be disabled or have special educational needs and those supported by pupil premium funding.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve attainment and ensure all pupils make good progress by:  ensuring the impact of the targeted support is closely monitored and adapted so that it has a greater effect on pupils’ progress  accurately monitoring the impact of the recently introduced initiative in writing to ensure it is improving standards.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve the impact of leadership and management by:  accurately analysing and using assessment data so that underperformance of any pupils can be swiftly tackled.  An external review of governance should be undertaken in order to assess how this aspect of leadership and governance may be improved.

p.3

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Children enter the Early Years Foundation Stage at levels just below age-related expectations. They make better than expected progress due to good teaching. They leave with levels broadly in line with those expected for their age.  At the end of 2012, pupils left Key Stage 1 with standards broadly in line with national averages in reading and mathematics but well below in writing. The 2013 results show an improvement in reading and mathematics but a decline in writing.  In the phonics screening check, at the end of Year 1, the proportion of pupils who achieved the expected standard was in line with the national average. This is an improvement over the previous year due to the good phonics teaching, especially in Year 1.  In 2012, most groups of pupils left Year 6 with attainment well below the national average. This included those pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds, those who speak English as an

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

additional language and those who joined within the school year. The school’s data suggest that in 2013 attainment was greatly improved in reading and mathematics, due to more consistent methods of teaching and assessing pupils’ work.   Scrutiny of pupils’ books shows that too few pupils make good progress.  Older pupils enjoy reading and are appreciative of the variety of activities they do in the reading lessons they have every day. These have accelerated the progress pupils make in reading.  The proportion of pupils who make expected and above expected progress in Key Stage 2 is broadly in line with the national average, but is inconsistent through the year groups.  The progress of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs is weak, with the notable proportion not making expected progress. The provision for those pupils with moderate learning difficulties enables them to make expected progress.

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 In the 2012 national tests, the attainment of the pupils in Year 6 who received support funded by the pupil premium was 12 months behind other pupils in English and mathematics. In 2013, the pupils receiving this funding made slightly less progress than their peers; consequently the gap is not reducing.

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Pupils’ achievement in the lessons is not always as good as it could be because teachers’ expectations, especially for the higher attaining pupils, are not sufficiently high. The progress of different groups of pupils is not consistent, because the work set is not matched closely enough to the needs of the individual pupils. The work does not always challenge the more able pupils in the class and limits their progress.  Pupils are eager to learn and engage well in the wide variety of tasks teachers give them. During many lessons, pupils have opportunities to talk together to share their thoughts and ideas to help extend their thinking and learning. They listen to each other well and value other’s opinions and views. They respond eagerly to questions.  The use of teaching assistants is varied. In the better lessons the assistants follow the teachers plan and effectively lead the learning of a group of pupils during part of the lesson. Where less

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

well directed, their effectiveness on the pupils’ learning is limited.  In the best lessons teachers use questioning well to maintain the pupils’ engagement and guide their learning. However, teachers do not use questions sufficiently well to assess the pupils’ understanding and modify the lessons, to ensure more pupils gain a good understanding of the subject.  The school has identified areas of weaker teaching and has taken steps to improve these, which are starting to prove effective. The school continues to accurately monitor the quality of teaching.  Marking is regular and consistent across the school. There is little evidence of teachers clearly telling the pupils how to improve their work. Older pupils are developing skills in assessing each other’s work.

p.4

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils behave well and feel safe. They are polite, kind and enthusiastic learners. There is a calm, respectful atmosphere in school and pupils care for each other.  Pupils’ behaviour in lessons and around the school is good. They are polite and courteous, and willing to help each other. They have good relationships with their teachers and other adults.  Pupils’ attitudes to learning are good. They concentrate well and listen to staff and each other. They are swift to respond to instructions.  A clear policy of rewards and sanctions is consistently used by staff and well understood and valued by pupils. Pupils are clear about how good behaviour and work are rewarded, and the sanctions that are used if they misbehave.  Pupils have a good knowledge of e-safety. Most have a good understanding of the different forms of bullying, including cyber bullying, and say the teachers have dealt with any rare cases

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

effectively.  Staff, parents and carers have a very positive view of behaviour, and only a few concerns were expressed. School records show a reducing, low number of incidents and the actions taken were appropriate.  Attendance remains in line with the national average and the number of pupils who are persistently absent remains consistently low.

p.5

The leadership and management require improvement

 The headteacher, deputy headteacher and governors are committed to accelerating the rate of school improvement and building on their more recent successes. However, leaders’ work to improve writing has yet to have an impact on achievement. This includes the management of the enhanced resource facility. Rates of progress in reading and mathematics in particular have improved, demonstrating that the school has the capacity to improve further. The vast majority of staff are highly positive about the leadership and management of the school.  School assessment data are not consistent enough to provide a basis for accurate self- assessment, and so some underachievement has been slow to be tackled. Although this matter is being addressed by the new headteacher and robust systems are being introduced it is too soon for there to have been any impact.  There is a sound system for managing teachers’ performance. Targets for teachers have been

p.5

The leadership and management require improvement

linked to improving their teaching and the pupils’ learning. Appropriate training is used so teachers develop their teaching skills. There is evidence that underperformance has been tackled and this has resulted in an improvement in the quality of teaching. Leaders are aware of the need to link teachers’ performance to their salaries.  Good systems are in place to support newly qualified teachers. These ensure they quickly become familiar with the school’s policies and know how to improve their teaching so they quickly become effective teachers.  The curriculum is broad and balanced giving opportunities for academic, sporting and technical development. The wider curriculum provides opportunities for many aspects of pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development to be strongly promoted. The curriculum does not provide enough opportunities to deepen pupils’ understanding of cultural diversity in modern

p.5

The leadership and management require improvement

Britain.  The local authority has provided accurate monitoring and support to the schoo and correctly identified some of the key issues of concern.  The school has plans to spend the extra funding for sports and physical education, focusing on benefits for pupils in the long term. Money is to be spent on coaches working alongside teachers, to enhance staff skills.  The governance of the school:  Governors know some of the strengths and weaknesses of the school. They care about the pupils. In some areas they are beginning to hold teachers to account for pupils’ progress and have a system for performance management of the headteacher. Governors have an overview of the quality of teaching across the school and there is some awareness of how teachers’ performance must be linked to salary progression. They know how pupil premium money is spent but are not sufficiently aware of its impact on eligible pupils. They do not provide the

p.5

The leadership and management require improvement

school leaders with sufficient challenge and strategic direction. As a result, issues of underachievement have not been tackled quickly enough. They have ensured safeguarding standards are met and they closely monitor the school’s finances.

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.7

School details

Unique reference number 110381 Local authority Milton Keynes Inspection number 426429

p.8

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.8

School details

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 377 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Lisa Peel Headteacher Mrs Lynn Samwell-Smith Date of previous school inspection 19–20 September 2011 Telephone number 01908 617868 Fax number 01908 211423 Email address giffardparkc@milton-keynes.gov.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.8

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.9

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk , or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.9

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.9

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion