Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Steffi Penny
- Postcode verified
GL1 4JU
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school should seek earlier training and faster instigation of this action to ensure those pupils most vulnerable due to their circumstances are more speedily supported to reach their potential. p.2
- You are very clear about what needs to be done and how; having already started the journey to improvement. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance11
“You and your senior leaders are working well together to tackle the most important weaknesses.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 754
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Caroline Holcombe St James Church of England Junior School Upton Street Gloucester Gloucestershire GL1 4JU
p.1
Junior School
Following my visit to your school on 9 October 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Junior School
The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in June 2013.
p.1
Evidence
During this inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher and members of the school’s senior leadership team, the Chair of the Governing Body and a representative from the local authority. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s action plan were evaluated. The school’s single central record was seen.
p.1
Context
You started working at the school as the acting headteacher in April 2013. There have been several important changes to the school since the last inspection judged it to require special measures. These include changes to the senior leadership team and governing body. The governing body is in the process of reorganisation with an intended reduction in membership from 15 to nine. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com
p.1
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Upon your appointment as acting headteacher, you quickly spotted that urgent improvements needed to be made. You and your senior leaders are working well together to tackle the most important weaknesses. You have established clear expectations, along with inaugurating higher aspirations, and are beginning to hold teachers to account for pupils’ achievement. The roles and responsibilities of senior and subject leaders have been clarified. They are demonstrating their willingness to be fully involved in the monitoring and evaluation of their areas of responsibility, along with being held to account for them. The school can show that improvements have already been made, particularly in terms of the learning environment and non- negotiable aspects of teaching and learning. Subject leaders’ records show that pupils are being more accurately assessed, for example through greater consistency in marking with more personalised targets subsequently set.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school has plans to initiate a nurture group following training starting in January 2014. The school should seek earlier training and faster instigation of this action to ensure those pupils most vulnerable due to their circumstances are more speedily supported to reach their potential.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The review of governance, which was a key recommendation of the previous inspection, is being undertaken. While they are at the early stage in driving school improvement, members have already been involved in subject visits with subject leaders to better understand the school.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The local authority’s statement of action is appropriate. It shows that the local authority is working closely with the school by organising arrangements with a neighbouring school to strengthen the leadership and management. The support work of consultants, some of whom you proactively organised, are effectively targeted to respond to the particular needs of the school.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The draft raising achievement plan has challenging targets that are linked well with the local authority’s statement of action. Actions have been taken on time and show what has been done to improve teaching. You are very clear about what needs to be done and how; having already started the journey to improvement. However, despite many strong elements within the draft plan, the following improvements are required in order to provide a clear direction out of special measures for all those who will need to use it.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Succinctly demonstrate how well the individual success criteria have been met to enable others to check that the subsequent actions taken are timely and the most appropriate. Link the management of teachers’ performance more closely to the progress made by the pupils they teach. Clearly identify the individuals responsible for ensuring effective actions have been taken, particularly governors. Provide references, and make clear the links between the whole-school plan and subject leaders’ plans. Provide direct references to other school records, such as the more detailed monitoring accounts.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Following the monitoring inspection these judgements were made:
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The local authority statement of action is fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school’s improvement plan is not fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school may not appoint newly qualified teachers before the next monitoring inspection.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Gloucestershire and the Diocese of Gloucester. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion