Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 6 Nov 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Steffi Penny

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Steffi Penny

  • Postcode verified

    GL1 4JU

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+52Positivemore positive than 52% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseclearstrongeffectivelyeffectiveaccuratelytimelyclearly
Criticismweaknesses

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings219w0
  • Leadership540w+52

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
754
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 28%Leadership 69%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Caroline Holcombe St James Church of England Junior School Upton Street Gloucester Gloucestershire GL1 4JU

p.1

Junior School

Following my visit to your school on 9 October 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Junior School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in June 2013.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher and members of the school’s senior leadership team, the Chair of the Governing Body and a representative from the local authority. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s action plan were evaluated. The school’s single central record was seen.

p.1

Context

You started working at the school as the acting headteacher in April 2013. There have been several important changes to the school since the last inspection judged it to require special measures. These include changes to the senior leadership team and governing body. The governing body is in the process of reorganisation with an intended reduction in membership from 15 to nine. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Upon your appointment as acting headteacher, you quickly spotted that urgent improvements needed to be made. You and your senior leaders are working well together to tackle the most important weaknesses. You have established clear expectations, along with inaugurating higher aspirations, and are beginning to hold teachers to account for pupils’ achievement. The roles and responsibilities of senior and subject leaders have been clarified. They are demonstrating their willingness to be fully involved in the monitoring and evaluation of their areas of responsibility, along with being held to account for them. The school can show that improvements have already been made, particularly in terms of the learning environment and non- negotiable aspects of teaching and learning. Subject leaders’ records show that pupils are being more accurately assessed, for example through greater consistency in marking with more personalised targets subsequently set.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school has plans to initiate a nurture group following training starting in January 2014. The school should seek earlier training and faster instigation of this action to ensure those pupils most vulnerable due to their circumstances are more speedily supported to reach their potential.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The review of governance, which was a key recommendation of the previous inspection, is being undertaken. While they are at the early stage in driving school improvement, members have already been involved in subject visits with subject leaders to better understand the school.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority’s statement of action is appropriate. It shows that the local authority is working closely with the school by organising arrangements with a neighbouring school to strengthen the leadership and management. The support work of consultants, some of whom you proactively organised, are effectively targeted to respond to the particular needs of the school.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The draft raising achievement plan has challenging targets that are linked well with the local authority’s statement of action. Actions have been taken on time and show what has been done to improve teaching. You are very clear about what needs to be done and how; having already started the journey to improvement. However, despite many strong elements within the draft plan, the following improvements are required in order to provide a clear direction out of special measures for all those who will need to use it.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

 Succinctly demonstrate how well the individual success criteria have been met to enable others to check that the subsequent actions taken are timely and the most appropriate.  Link the management of teachers’ performance more closely to the progress made by the pupils they teach.  Clearly identify the individuals responsible for ensuring effective actions have been taken, particularly governors.  Provide references, and make clear the links between the whole-school plan and subject leaders’ plans.  Provide direct references to other school records, such as the more detailed monitoring accounts.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection these judgements were made:

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s improvement plan is not fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school may not appoint newly qualified teachers before the next monitoring inspection.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Gloucestershire and the Diocese of Gloucester. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion