Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 6 Nov 2013

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Matthew Haynes

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Matthew Haynes

  • Postcode verified

    GU8 5PB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+52Positivemore positive than 52% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectivehigh expectationsrigorousstrengthspreciselyimproving
Criticismweaknessesnot alwaysnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

Tim Burgess Headteacher The Chandler CofE Aided Junior School Middlemarch Roke Lane Godalming Surrey GU8 5PB

p.1

Aided Junior School

Following my visit to your school on 9 October 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Aided Junior School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in June 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Aided Junior School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Aided Junior School

 set targets for the proportions of pupils making and exceeding expected progress in reading, writing and mathematics  set specific targets to further reduce the gap between the achievement of pupils who are eligible for the pupil premium and all other pupils at the school  clarify who is going to evaluate which aspects of the school’s improvement, how and when. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, other leaders, four governors including the Chair of the Governing Body, and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated. I visited every class to see the pupils at work. I scrutinised a number of documents, including information about pupils’ achievement, records of lesson observations made by leaders, and examples of teachers’ planning. I looked closely at a sample of pupils’ books.

p.2

Context

Three teaching assistants have left the school since the inspection and one teacher has started.

p.2

Main findings

The headteacher has rightly set high expectations about the pace of improvement. As a result, leaders are acting urgently to make improvements. A programme of appropriate training for teachers and teaching assistants is in place. Consequently, teaching and pupils’ achievement are beginning to improve. Teachers are starting to plan lessons that are more precisely matched to pupils’ abilities so that all pupils, including the more able, are stretched. Teachers and teaching assistants are beginning to question pupils more effectively in order to promote pupils’ thinking. Teachers’ marking is improving, since pupils are now more aware of what they have done well and what they need to do to improve. Increasingly, pupils are given opportunities to act on teachers’ advice. Leaders, including middle leaders, regularly check on pupils’ achievement and the quality of teaching. The process for checking teachers’ performance has been revised and is now more rigorous.

p.2

Main findings

Governors continue to challenge and support school leaders effectively. They have a detailed understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the school. The Chair of the Governing Body played an important part in the development of the school improvement plan following the inspection. This plan addresses all of the areas for improvement effectively. However, whilst targets for improvements in pupils’ achievement have been set, these need to be sharpened to show the proportions of pupils that will make and exceed expected progress in reading, writing and mathematics. There also needs to be a sharper focus on reducing the gap between the achievement of pupils eligible for the pupil premium and other pupils. In addition, it is not always clear who will be evaluating improvements, how this will be done and when.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The headteacher is making good use of the effective support provided by the local authority. The leadership partner helped develop the action plan, and he visits the school regularly to give advice and to check the progress being made. He is also contributing to improvements in reading and writing. A consultant is working effectively with teachers, teaching assistants and leaders to improve pupils’ achievement in mathematics. The local authority challenges school leaders effectively through regular meetings to monitor and evaluate improvements.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Surrey and the Diocese of Guildford.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion