Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Matthew Haynes
- Postcode verified
GU8 5PB
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school should take further action to: p.1
- However, whilst targets for improvements in pupils’ achievement have been set, these need to be sharpened to show the proportions of pupils that will make and exceed expected progress in reading, writing and mathematics. p.2
- There also needs to be a sharper focus on reducing the gap between the achievement of pupils eligible for the pupil premium and other pupils. p.2
- Teachers’ marking is improving, since pupils are now more aware of what they have done well and what they need to do to improve. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment14
“The headteacher has rightly set high expectations about the pace of improvement.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 740
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Tim Burgess Headteacher The Chandler CofE Aided Junior School Middlemarch Roke Lane Godalming Surrey GU8 5PB
p.1
Aided Junior School
Following my visit to your school on 9 October 2013, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings of my visit. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Aided Junior School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in June 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Aided Junior School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
Aided Junior School
set targets for the proportions of pupils making and exceeding expected progress in reading, writing and mathematics set specific targets to further reduce the gap between the achievement of pupils who are eligible for the pupil premium and all other pupils at the school clarify who is going to evaluate which aspects of the school’s improvement, how and when. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you, other leaders, four governors including the Chair of the Governing Body, and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated. I visited every class to see the pupils at work. I scrutinised a number of documents, including information about pupils’ achievement, records of lesson observations made by leaders, and examples of teachers’ planning. I looked closely at a sample of pupils’ books.
p.2
Context
Three teaching assistants have left the school since the inspection and one teacher has started.
p.2
Main findings
The headteacher has rightly set high expectations about the pace of improvement. As a result, leaders are acting urgently to make improvements. A programme of appropriate training for teachers and teaching assistants is in place. Consequently, teaching and pupils’ achievement are beginning to improve. Teachers are starting to plan lessons that are more precisely matched to pupils’ abilities so that all pupils, including the more able, are stretched. Teachers and teaching assistants are beginning to question pupils more effectively in order to promote pupils’ thinking. Teachers’ marking is improving, since pupils are now more aware of what they have done well and what they need to do to improve. Increasingly, pupils are given opportunities to act on teachers’ advice. Leaders, including middle leaders, regularly check on pupils’ achievement and the quality of teaching. The process for checking teachers’ performance has been revised and is now more rigorous.
p.2
Main findings
Governors continue to challenge and support school leaders effectively. They have a detailed understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the school. The Chair of the Governing Body played an important part in the development of the school improvement plan following the inspection. This plan addresses all of the areas for improvement effectively. However, whilst targets for improvements in pupils’ achievement have been set, these need to be sharpened to show the proportions of pupils that will make and exceed expected progress in reading, writing and mathematics. There also needs to be a sharper focus on reducing the gap between the achievement of pupils eligible for the pupil premium and other pupils. In addition, it is not always clear who will be evaluating improvements, how this will be done and when.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The headteacher is making good use of the effective support provided by the local authority. The leadership partner helped develop the action plan, and he visits the school regularly to give advice and to check the progress being made. He is also contributing to improvements in reading and writing. A consultant is working effectively with teachers, teaching assistants and leaders to improve pupils’ achievement in mathematics. The local authority challenges school leaders effectively through regular meetings to monitor and evaluate improvements.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Surrey and the Diocese of Guildford.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion