Other · Ofsted report
Whitstone Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
9 Oct 2013
- Inspectors verified
Paul Sadler
- Postcode verified
EX22 6PH
- Name on report verified
Whitstone Community Primary School
- URN verified
111941
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.7
- Pupils’ achievement in reading is excellent. p.1
- authorised in exceptional circumstances. p.5
- sporting opportunities, educational visits and artistic experiences is exceptional, and is enhanced by the school’s membership of the Bude Community Schools Trust. p.5
- Teachers use questioning very well to develop the skills of all their pupils. p.1
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.7
- This is because they have too few opportunities to write about their own interests and there are weaknesses in the spelling and handwriting of a few pupils. p.1
- Teaching assistants have a range of skills and diverse experience, but are not always used to best effect when supporting learning in the whole class because they are not always sufficiently well briefed by the class teacher. p.5
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.7
- School leaders have identified correctly that the progress of a few of the small number of pupils who are disabled or who have special educational needs is slower than it should be, and that this is mainly due to the weaknesses in writing identified above. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Improve pupils’ writing by: widening opportunities for pupils to use their personal interests and experience in their work tackling the weaknesses exhibited by some pupils in their spelling and in the presentation of their work. p.3
- Improve attendance by: ensuring that parents are fully conversant with new local policies concerning the authorisation of leave for holidays and other social and personal events tackling persistent absence, including among pupils who qualify for the pupil premium. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Reading & phonics10
“Pupils’ achievement in reading is excellent.” p.1Curriculum6
“The curriculum is a notable strength.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 2,034
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Whitstone Community Primary School Oak Lane, Whitstone, Holsworthy, EX22 6PH
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a good school. Pupils’ achievement in reading is excellent. They read widely for their age and make very good progress. Their achievement in many other subjects including mathematics, science and physical education is also good. The achievement of pupils in receipt of the pupil premium is equal to that of other pupils, both in the school and nationally. Teaching is consistently good and motivates pupils to learn. Teachers use questioning very well to develop the skills of all their pupils. Assessment is used well to enable pupils to improve their work. Pupils behave very well in lessons and around the school. They say there is very little bullying and this is supported by the school’s records. The curriculum is a notable strength. It is very successful in promoting pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development because of the wide range of experiences it gives them. The school is well led by the headteacher and
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
governing body. There is a good analysis of the school’s strengths and weaknesses, for example, both aspects noted below have been identified and are being tackled. Governors are effective in monitoring both pupils’ achievement and teaching quality.
p.1
It is not yet an outstanding school because
While most pupils make at least the expected progress in writing, their achievement in this aspect is not as good as in reading. This is because they have too few opportunities to write about their own interests and there are weaknesses in the spelling and handwriting of a few pupils. Attendance is below average and persistent absence, including among pupils in receipt of the pupil premium, is too high.
p.1
Information about this inspection
The inspector observed eight lessons taught by four teachers. He made briefer observations of groups of pupils learning letters and their sounds (phonics). He reviewed documents, including those relating to pupils’ attainment and progress, behaviour and safeguarding. Meetings were held with staff, groups of pupils and with members of the governing body. Most inspection activities were conducted jointly with the headteacher. The views of 15 parents who submitted them on the Parent View website, and of staff who completed a questionnaire, were analysed and taken into account. A small number of written comments from parents were also considered.
p.2
Inspection team
Paul Sadler, Lead inspector Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
The school is much smaller than the average primary school and serves a rural part of north Cornwall. The number of pupils supported through school action is average, as is the proportion who are supported through school action plus or who have statements of special educational needs. Most of these students have moderate learning or behavioural difficulties. The proportion of students known to be eligible for the pupil premium is average. The pupil premium provides additional funding for children in local authority care, pupils known to be eligible for free school meals and children of families in the armed services. However, the number of such pupils in each year group is very small; for example, there was none in the Year 6 who left in 2013. The proportion of pupils who join or leave the school other than at the usual times is very high. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set the minimum
p.3
Information about this school
expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in English and mathematics. The school is a member of the Bude Community Schools Trust which comprises a secondary school and seven other local primary schools. The school shares its site with a privately run pre-school which was not inspected on this occasion.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve pupils’ writing by: widening opportunities for pupils to use their personal interests and experience in their work tackling the weaknesses exhibited by some pupils in their spelling and in the presentation of their work.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Improve attendance by: ensuring that parents are fully conversant with new local policies concerning the authorisation of leave for holidays and other social and personal events tackling persistent absence, including among pupils who qualify for the pupil premium.
p.3
The achievement of pupils is good
While data must be treated with caution due to the small number of pupils in each year, over time their attainment in national tests at the end of Year 6 in reading and mathematics is consistently above the national average. The proportions making or exceeding the progress expected of them is also above average. Pupils learn to read quickly. For example, after one month in Year 1, all pupils could read every one of the 44 sounds derived from letters or combinations of letters. By Year 6, they read widely. A discussion about their reading led to debate about the discovery of the Higgs boson, and as to whether the extinction of the dinosaurs arose from climate change or an asteroid collision. Pupils’ achievement in writing, while generally at least in line with national benchmarks, is less good than in reading. School leaders recognise this and have introduced new approaches to teaching writing in Reception to Year 3. In Years 4 to 6, pupils have insufficient opportunities to
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
write about their own interests and experiences. A minority of pupils have particular difficulties with spelling and with the presentation of work, including handwriting, that have yet to be addressed. Pupils achieve well in mathematics, where they learn to solve problems and identify patterns and sequences of numbers. In science, pupils in Years 4 to 6 can identify evidence that air is a substance with mass. The quality of work in art and design displayed around the school is high. Pupils talk with enthusiasm about their opportunities in physical education (PE) and sport. They succeed in dance and gymnastics and in team games such as football and netball. They also enjoy music, with opportunities to learn to play a wide range of instruments. There are too few pupils in receipt of the pupil premium to make statistical comparisons of their progress, but evidence shows that their achievement is at least in line with that of other pupils in
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
the school, and also compares favourably with national data. School leaders have identified correctly that the progress of a few of the small number of pupils who are disabled or who have special educational needs is slower than it should be, and that this is mainly due to the weaknesses in writing identified above. Children in the Reception year start school with skills below those found nationally, especially in their literacy and numeracy. They make good progress so that by the end of the year their achievement is in line with that found nationally. The high proportion of pupils who join the school after Reception achieve well during their time at the school. In spite of their isolated location, pupils have a good understanding of people of other faiths and cultures. They talk excitedly of visits made to places of worship of the Christian, Islamic and Sikh faiths in Exeter and Bristol. This is a good example of the pupils’ very good spiritual, moral,
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
social and cultural development and of the way the school fosters tolerance of others and tackles discrimination.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
In all three classes, there are consistent approaches to aspects such as the management of behaviour and the marking of work that help pupils to feel secure and confident when learning. Because teachers know their pupils well, they design tasks that meet their needs. Pupils get good opportunities to use and develop their skills of literacy, numeracy and of working independently and in groups. Teachers direct carefully planned questions at individuals that enable them to learn quickly and gain in confidence. Lessons are conducted at a good pace that generates great enthusiasm in pupils. This is especially true in Reception to Year 3 when learning the letters and their sounds, and in retelling stories as part of the new approach to the teaching of writing. Work is marked thoroughly and pupils value the high quality of feedback that helps them to improve their work. They are given appropriate targets for the next steps in their learning.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
However pupils, including those in Years 5 and 6, have little idea of how the quality of their work compares with that of others nationally. Teachers use resources effectively, especially when teaching reading. There is a wide range of books and other reading material in classrooms and the well-equipped library. They are also effective in using information and communication technology (ICT) in the classroom. However the ICT security system, while appropriately barring pupils from unsuitable websites, also limits teachers’ access to useful teaching resources. Teaching assistants have a range of skills and diverse experience, but are not always used to best effect when supporting learning in the whole class because they are not always sufficiently well briefed by the class teacher.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
Pupils behave very well. They are polite and considerate towards each other and to adults. They play well together and are punctual when returning to lessons. It is notable that even the youngest children play and learn well together. This demonstrates the school’s commitment to developing good relationships among its pupils. Pupils say there is very little bullying and that they feel safe in school. The school’s records show that there have been no serious incidents for a number of years. Pupils are taught about the dangers of different forms of bullying such as cyber-bullying and of how to avoid them. They are also taught how to be safe, for example, when cycling or playing near water. School leaders are aware that attendance has been below average for several years and have put in place a number of strategies to improve it. The Bude Community Schools Trust has recently adopted a policy where absence for activities such as family holidays will only be
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
authorised in exceptional circumstances. However, some parents are as yet unaware of the application of this policy. A small but significant number of pupils are persistently absent. This includes some pupils in receipt of the pupil premium and affects their potential to benefit from this funding. Reasons given for their absence are sometimes inappropriate, such as to attend local agricultural shows.
p.5
The leadership and management are good
School leaders, including governors, have a good understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses and have taken action to improve the latter. Recent action to improve the teaching of writing is an example of this, although the impact of this, and of actions taken to improve attendance, have yet to be seen. Pupils’ progress is tracked effectively and action is taken to remedy any slow progress. Staff are alert to pupils’ disabilities or special educational needs and the progress of those in receipt of the pupil premium is monitored with similar rigour. Teachers’ performance is managed effectively. The headteacher has an accurate view of the quality of teaching and all staff, including teaching assistants, receive necessary training. Staff morale is good and teachers are supportive of school leaders. The curriculum is a particular strength and excites pupils. For such a small school, the range of
p.5
The leadership and management are good
sporting opportunities, educational visits and artistic experiences is exceptional, and is enhanced by the school’s membership of the Bude Community Schools Trust. The breadth of the curriculum demonstrates the school’s commitment to the promotion of equality of opportunity. The very good variety of extra-curricular activities is a further strength valued by pupils. While the school has yet to receive the new funding to enhance sport in primary schools, appropriate and varied plans for its use are at an advanced stage. These include further collaboration with the other schools in the Trust, employment of coaches in a wider range of sports and work to teach pupils how to adopt a healthier lifestyle. Parents rightly have a positive view of the school and value the staff’s good knowledge of their children as individuals. A parent wrote with particular warmth of the support her children had received and of the approachability of the headteacher and other staff.
p.5
The leadership and management are good
In recent years, the local authority’s support for the school has been light, although support has been received from the education welfare service in order to improve attendance. Overall, the level of support for this good school is appropriate. The governance of the school: Governors monitor the school’s work effectively and are well informed by the headteacher about pupils’ achievement, including that of those in receipt of the pupil premium. They have an accurate view of the quality of teaching and of how this links to pupils’ progress and the responsibilities undertaken by staff for additional salary. They have a good understanding of the challenges that small schools are likely to face in the future and have appropriately undertaken research into different models of leadership and governance. Governors are aware of the plans for the use of additional sports funding and rightly intend to monitor its impact.
p.6
The leadership and management are good
Governors are well trained and make a good contribution to the school’s undoubted capacity to improve further. The governing body meets its statutory responsibilities, such as to ensure that children are safe.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 111941 Local authority Cornwall Inspection number 426801
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 4–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 68 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Clare Horn Headteacher Paul Woolner Date of previous school inspection 25 November 2008 Telephone number 01288 341241 Fax number 01288 341241 Email address secretary@whitstone.cornwall.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion