Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Writtle Junior School

Inspected 11 Oct 2013 · published 6 Nov 2013 · URN 115047

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    11 Oct 2013

  • Inspectors verified

    Diana Songer-Hudgell, Ruth Brock

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    CM1 3HG

  • Name on report verified

    Writtle Junior School

  • URN verified

    115047

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2008.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+36Positivemore positive than 7% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingvery wellenjoyconsistentlymake good progressimprovedgood progresseffectively
Criticisminadequatenot alwaysrequires improvementnot yetfailseriousweaknessesnot outstanding

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1459w+42
  • Leadership715w+23
  • What needs to improve135w+67

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,235
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 48
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
1
typical 2
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 48%Leadership 24%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 24%

Full report text

Writtle Junior School Margaretting Road, Writtle, Chelmsford, CM1 3HG

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Pupils make good progress and standards are rising steadily. Previous gaps in learning between different groups of pupils have narrowed significantly because teaching has improved and is now consistently good.  In mathematics, where attainment had been weaker, the more-able now do particularly well. More than four times the national average achieved the highest Level 6 in this subject in 2012.  Teachers make learning interesting and provide good advice in their written marking to help pupils of all abilities make good gains in learning and to make good progress.  The headteacher, supported by well-informed governors, has a clear and determined vision for raising standards. Action taken has enabled sustained improvements in the quality of teaching and learning.  Behaviour is good; pupils respect each other and adults in the school and care well for each other. The provision for pupils’ spiritual, moral,

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

social and cultural development is good. This contributes to the vibrancy in the school where pupils develop confidence, self-esteem and a thirst for learning.  Pupils benefit from a wide range of opportunities for physical, social and creative development, such as school sport, becoming first aiders and specialist music lessons.  Parents are highly appreciative of the school and all it does. Almost all say that their children are happy, safe and well cared for and they would recommend this school to others.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 Teaching does not consistently enable pupils to take enough responsibility for their own learning, for instance, to move on to new tasks as soon as they are ready, or respond promptly to the teachers’ good written guidance.  Teachers with leadership responsibilities are not yet fully involved in the school’s self evaluation process and as a consequence there are missed opportunities to ensure they focus on areas requiring development.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed 14 lessons or parts of lessons. Some of these were observed with the head teacher to check how accurately he evaluated teaching.  Inspectors took account of the 40 responses to the online questionnaire (Parent View) and 21 staff questionnaire responses. A meeting was held with some pupils.  Inspectors held discussions with senior staff and subject leaders, a group of governors, a representative of the local authority and the school improvement consultant.  Inspectors observed the school’s work and looked at school documentation, including teachers’ planning, the school’s self-evaluation, school and subject development plans, assessment information, monitoring files, governing body minutes, safeguarding documentation and samples of pupils’ work.  Inspectors listened to pupils read and talked with them about their reading.

p.2

Inspection team

Ruth Brock, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Diana Songer-Hudgell Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 The school is smaller than most schools of this type but the number of pupils is growing.  Most pupils are White British with very few who speak English as an additional language.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs requiring school action is above the national average, as is the proportion requiring external support or with a statement of special educational needs.  The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium – additional government funding for looked after children and pupils known to be eligible for free school meals – is below the national average.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress.  There have been a number of significant changes to staffing since the previous inspection.  The head teacher, staff and governors work collaboratively with local schools and partnerships.

p.3

Information about this school

 There is a privately run before-and after-school club on site, which is inspected and reported upon separately.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Develop the skills of all teachers with leadership responsibilities so that they contribute more to the rigorous monitoring and school’s self evaluation by:  planning in time and opportunities for all leaders to work more collaboratively  using existing, good data to target priorities consistently across the school  making good use of the exemplars from within the school and from the local teaching school.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Raise attainment further and accelerate pupils’ progress by:  increasing the amount of outstanding teaching across all year groups  providing more opportunities for pupils to take responsibility for their own learning and for moving on when tasks have been completed  ensuring that there is regular, planned time for pupils to respond to teachers’ marking and feedback using the best practice in the school as a model.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Standards are broadly in line with the national average, in reading, writing and mathematics. They have risen each year since the previous inspection. In 2012 they were the best they have been for some years. This represents good progress for each individual from their varied starting points.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The significant number of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs settle into the school quickly because of the well-planned learning that meets their needs. This helps them to make at least as much progress as their classmates.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The gap in attainment in 2012 between pupils eligible for pupil premium funding and others was significant. In English, they were a year behind, and nearly two years behind, in mathematics. Funding has been effectively used to ensure that all pupils are supported in class by extra adults and by a school counsellor. As a consequence, their progress has accelerated rapidly and they are now attaining similar standards as other pupils.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The previous inspection pointed to attainment and progress in mathematics in Key Stage 2 as being an area for improvement. This has been accomplished through careful planning and as result, pupils’ needs are met very well and standards have risen, especially for the more-able pupils, who now achieve the highest levels.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The higher standards and rates of progress are not only due to good teaching, but are also the result of pupils consistently good attitudes to learning. Although they are sometimes reliant on the teacher to tell them to go on with the next task, they are keen and interested in learning, and concentrate well. This was supported by the quality of the work in the pupils’ books.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 School data show that the percentage of pupils doing as well as most pupils nationally has increased since 2012. Pupils in all year groups are making consistently good progress in reading, writing and mathematics with the percentage of pupils exceeding the nationally expected levels of progress rising steadily.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils enjoy reading. They happily pick up a book for pleasure and eloquently explain why they like a particular author or style of book becoming animated when discussing their choices. Pupils make their writing interesting for the reader by using imaginative words, in for example, the ‘jubilant journey’ that Wallace and Gromit made.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The school is using its allocated sports funding to employ an external, locally-organised programme of physical education and sport to build added depth to the already considerable participation in extra curricular sporting activities and to support less experienced staff. Pupils told us that the school is ‘very sporty’ and they are beginning to win many trophies.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils also achieve well in other creative areas. Inspectors observed a wonderful music lesson taken by the music specialist. Pupils proficiently played guitars, keyboards, xylophones and recorders and sang beautifully when recorded for a forthcoming celebration event.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching has improved since the previous inspection and has made a good impact on pupils’ achievement. Staffing changes have meant a new team has been developed, and this has invigorated the quality of teaching.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching is typically well organised and interesting. Pupils are asked to regularly assess their understanding either with a ‘thumbs up’ or by discussion with a fellow pupil. As a result, pupils enjoy their lessons and are eager to learn.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Marking is a notable strength of the school and teachers understand what they need to do to help pupils to improve. Some use questioning well to challenge pupils to think more independently and deepen their thinking. However, sometimes teachers interrupt pupils’ independent learning too readily, holding back their thinking.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers and learning support assistants work well together to ensure pupils, whatever their ability, make good progress. Pupils, especially those with disabilities and special educational needs, say they grow in confidence as they move through the school knowing who they can ask to help them. There is however, sometimes, a tendency for pupils in small groups to become too reliant on adults to direct and guide them. This hinders their independence.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers manage behaviour well ensuring pupils develop very positive attitudes to learning across the school. Expectations are high and pupils appreciate the way rewards and sanctions are applied fairly.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 A small amount of teaching requires improvement. This is because the work set was not always well matched to pupils’ needs, limiting the rate of progress pupils could make. Staff do not have enough opportunities to see, within the school and elsewhere, what outstanding teaching looks like.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Pupils are not always encouraged to take as much responsibility as possible for their own learning. As a result, they do not always take initiatives or challenge themselves further and this sometimes limits the progress they can make.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils enjoy coming to school reflected in the improvement to their attendance over the past year to above average and a significant reduction in the proportion of exclusions. Pupils say that the adults’ and other pupils’ friendliness are particular strengths of the school.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils behave very well in lessons and around the school and enjoy learning. They enjoy playing together and value the ‘very friendly and helpful midday assistants’. Pupils take care over their work, presenting it consistently well throughout the school.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils are very courteous towards adults and one another. Adults model well respect for each other, pupils and the school’s environment. They are proud of their school and remain so even after they have left. One pupil wrote to inspectors to say how his transition to secondary school went well because his time at the school had given him ‘a lot of confidence’.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils take responsibility well for the roles they have been given. For example, older pupils enjoy duties like noting celebrations of pupils’ achievements to put in the school’s newsletter or being members of the school council which they take very seriously.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils say they feel very safe in school. They are knowledgeable about different types of bullying from physical contact to ‘not being friendly’, and know to take care when using the internet. They commented that there was virtually no bullying and they were confident that staff would deal with any concerns.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Parents say that they know that their children are safe and happy in school. Virtually all say that they would recommend this school to other parents and two parents wrote to inspectors extolling the virtues of the school, its leaders and the care it offers their children.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Behaviour is not yet outstanding because, occasionally, when tasks do no motivate them, some pupils lose concentration and go ‘off task’, or fail to move on quickly enough when they have finished a task.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The headteacher, well supported by all staff and governors, has a clear ambition for the school to be as good as it possibly can be. This has resulted in a rise in the standards in all aspects of school life since the previous inspection through a steady improvement in the quality of teaching and learning.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Staff, pupils and governors have a very positive opinion of the headteacher’s leadership. There is effective practice and leadership in the majority of areas of the school that bodes well for further improvements.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Rigorous monitoring of teaching and pupils’ progress, combined with appropriate training and support matched to the school’s and individual’s needs resulting in high levels of morale among staff and pupils.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Leaders have a good awareness of the school’s strengths and areas of development, and their improvement plan is focused on the right priorities to improve achievement further. Teachers are becoming increasingly accountable for their performance.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Subject leaders monitor teachers’ planning and pupils’ progress by checking planning, assessment, lessons and work in pupils’ books. However, the regularity of this monitoring, and the use of existing good data, is not fully consistent in all subjects and does not always feed into subsequent planning. Opportunities to collaborate are developing.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Leaders are especially successful in promoting pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural awareness. This is promoted through a wide range of subjects and activities, notably through its work to develop understanding of European arts and culture.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Students and newly qualified teachers are recruited to the school so that senior leaders can effectively ‘grow their own’. As a consequence teaching has improved considerably in the last two years with staff being motivated and eager to remain at the school.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Links with other local schools and the teaching school are very strong and productive. This has a positive impact on school improvement, standards and staff’s professional development. However, not all opportunities are exploited for best practice to be shared.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The local authority has an increasingly appropriate, light touch approach to this good school. Leaders have worked tirelessly particularly in the last two years, to ensure that inadequate teaching is eradicated and they speak highly of the advice and guidance that the local authority has provided.  The governance of the school:  Governors have a clear understanding of the school’s strengths and areas for development based upon their monitoring usually conducted on ‘governor days’. Through good-quality training from the local authority and by attracting experienced governors, they have developed good skills to interpret data. As a consequence, they support and challenge the head teacher effectively about the quality of teaching and pupils’ achievement. Governors receive appropriate information about the management of teachers’ performance and see that teachers’ pay rises are appropriately linked to pupils’ achievements. They are fully aware of

p.6

The leadership and management are good

how the pupil premium and sports funding is spent, and the impact this has on the achievement of pupils. Governors ensure that the school meets current requirements for safeguarding children. Policies are regularly reviewed to ensure that children are kept safe and free from harm.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 115047 Local authority Essex Inspection number 425231

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Junior School category Community Age range of pupils 7–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 214 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Ralph Bray Headteacher Nicholas Taylor Date of previous school inspection 27 September 2011 Telephone number 01245 420592 Fax number 01245 422561 Email address admin@writtle-jun.essex.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion